|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Adam Smith Inst - Stuck in the middle with EU - Why it’s time we cut out the middle man and become global citizens
EU membership rendered redundant by global governance,
Global regulators revealed as the real law ‘manufacturers’, whilst the EU is often only the ‘wholesaler’,
Key regulation affecting the UK deliberated at global level and leaving the EU would not diminish British influence,
UK should leave the EU and focus on its position at the global top table,
EU membership has been made redundant by global regulators, according to a new paper from the Adam Smith Institute released today. Published independently of both the major campaigns, the report reveals that the UK often has little say over EU regulation, as in reality so much of it originates at the global level.
Rather than the expected ‘bonfire of regulations’ upon exit, or a situation where the UK is at the mercy of Single Market regulations without having any influence on them, the free-market think tank has highlighted that 80% of Single Market legislation falls within the ambit of existing international organisations and is consequently open to global regulation. The EU itself originates very few market standards and rules, the study shows, despite its sprawling size, and it frequently outsources and copies global agreements verbatim.
The new paper Global Regulators: Stuck in the middle with EU, written by European Union expert and ASI fellow Roland Smith, lays out how the UK’s ability to influence global legislation would change for the better following an exit from the EU.
The author notes that whilst we are told EU membership is necessary so that we “have a say” in the rules affecting our industries, the fact is that everything from fishing to food packaging and car standards to disability rights are now driven by a myriad of global organisations – even the infamous rule on straight cucumbers is now in the hands of a global body.
Contrary to popular belief, the adoption of standards by the EU from bodies such as Codex is not voluntary, and is enforceable by the World Trade Organisation’s Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement. The TBT Agreement makes global bodies the ‘manufacturers’ of the law, whilst the EU is often merely the ‘wholesaler’.
The paper goes on to argue that rather than stay in the EU, the UK should focus on formalising and democratising the UK’s global governance involvement, bringing the UK’s full voice to it as an open, global trading nation. In the context of Brexit, ‘isolation’ is near impossible in the globalised world, in which Britain could operate at the new global top table as opposed to the EU’s shrinking one.
Author of the report Roland Smith said:
“The rhetoric about the UK being isolated is out of place when you consider the global landscape. If the EU didn’t exist, we wouldn’t be in a rush to invent it. The global single market is overtaking the EU, and since we are not in the Euro and have no need for political integration, it is time to leave and take our place as a truly global citizen.”
Sam Bowman, Executive Director of the Adam Smith Institute said:
“This report shows that the strongest argument for staying in the EU is actually rather weak. The EU is increasingly best understood as a regulatory intermediary, codifying for member states rules that have been agreed at an international level. If so, it is not clear at all that the UK would have less influence on global regulation if it left the EU – indeed, paradoxically, Britain may have a louder voice at the top tables if it was outside the EU rather than in.”
Notes to editors:
To download Global Regulators: Stuck in the middle with EU, click here.
For further comments or to arrange an interview, contact Head of Communications Flora Laven-Morris at firstname.lastname@example.org / 07584 778207.
The Adam Smith Institute is a free market, libertarian think tank based in London. It advocates classically liberal public policies to create a richer, freer world.
Latest News from
NIESR: Forcing working mothers from jobs costs business £280m each year28/10/2016 14:25:00
British businesses are losing nearly £280 million each year as a result of women being forced out of their jobs by pregnancy and maternity discrimination, according to new research carried out by NIESR for the Equality and Human Rights Commission and published yesterday.
Kings Fund - Lack of investment in new services puts NHS plan at risk27/10/2016 10:40:00
The absence of ring-fenced funding for investing in new services could jeopardise plans to improve patient care outlined in the NHS five year forward view (Forward View), according to a new report from The King's Fund.
IFS - Council funding reform may mean big winners and losers27/10/2016 09:35:00
Council funding reform may mean big winners and losers
IEA - The Government should not put all its eggs in one basket on airport expansion25/10/2016 16:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Government giving the green light to Heathrow expansion