National Audit Office Press Releases
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Investigation into the acceptance of gifts and hospitality
The NAO has published the findings from its investigation into the acceptance of gifts and hospitality by government officials.
“Public officials are sometimes offered gifts and hospitality by external stakeholders which it is reasonable for them to accept. This can, however, present a risk of actual or perceived conflicts of interest, and undermine value for money or affect government’s reputation. While most, but not all, cases declared by officials appear on the face of it to be justifiable in the normal course of business, we found some weaknesses in the oversight and control of gifts and hospitality. This needs to be addressed by the Cabinet Office and departments.”
Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 9 February 2016
The National Audit Office has yesterday published the findings from its investigation into the acceptance of gifts and hospitality. The report examines the rules and guidance for central government officials and published transparency data on the gifts and hospitality received by departmental board members, directors-general and senior military officers between April 2012 and March 2015.
The NAO also reviewed the gift and hospitality guidance and the gift and hospitality registers in three case study departments: the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS), HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and Defence, Equipment and Support (DE&S), a bespoke trading entity within the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
The key findings of this investigation are:
- Accepting modest hospitality is sometimes justified. Officials often need to engage with a range of external contacts in order in order to carry out their work efficiently and effectively.
- The Cabinet Office has a principles-based approach to guiding officials on whether they can accept gifts and hospitality. The three principles are: purpose (in the interests of government); proportionality (not over-frequent, over-generous or disproportionate); and avoidance of conflict of interest.
- Rules and processes on gifts and hospitality could be more stringent. The NAO found that policies and practices fell short of good practice in some respects.
- There are some weaknesses in controls over gifts and hospitality. Departments should use a risk-based and proportionate approach, but the NAO found weaknesses in some areas, for example locating gift and hospitality registers and management oversight of trends and local practices across departmental groups.
- The publication of hospitality record of senior officials helps to promote public accountability. Reporting started in 2009 and has become part of the transparency agenda.
- Some departments are not meeting the transparency requirements. The Cabinet Office requires departments to report the hospitality accepted by board members and directors-generals and above (‘senior officials’) each quarter. Twelve out of 17 departments, including BIS and HMRC, have published this information for every quarter from April 2012 to March 2015.
- The NAO estimates that senior officials in 17 departments accepted some £29,000 of gifts and hospitality in 2014-15. Senior officials accepted gifts and hospitality 3,413 times between 2012-13 and 2014-15. The total number of reported cases of senior officials accepting gifts and hospitality ranged from 718 times in BIS to 20 times in DFID. Levels of hospitality are likely to reflect different rules and reporting requirements as well the different roles of departments.
- The NAO estimates that officials in the 3 case study departments accepted a total of over £150,000 of gifts and hospitality in 2014-15. Although the total value of hospitality accepted may not be high, the reputational risks around accepting it can be substantial.
- Officials accept hospitality from many organisations and individuals. Senior officials in the 17 departments reported accepting hospitality (most often dinner) from some 1,495 different organisations (or individuals) between 2012-13 and 2014 15. Frequent acceptance of hospitality from particular organisations is not necessarily wrong, but it does need to be in the proportion to the business relationship.
- While most cases of gifts and hospitality appear to be reasonable, the NAO found some examples where acceptance may not have been consistent with the Cabinet Office principles. Most of the hospitality and many of the gifts accepted seem reasonable and consistent with the principles. However, in its review of the registers and transparency data, the NAO identified some concerns. These included: tickets to professional sports and cultural events, sometimes accompanied by a spouse and/or children; bottles of champagne; and iPads.
Latest News from
National Audit Office Press Releases
NAO work on transition grant and rural services delivery grant17/02/2017 14:14:00
In response to correspondence from Helen Goodman MP on behalf of 11 other MPs the NAO conducted an investigation into the Department for Communities and Local Government’s approach to the allocation of transition grant and rural service delivery grant (rural grant) for 2016-17.
Investigation into the Department’s approach to tackling fraud09/02/2017 15:15:15
The NAO has conducted an investigation into DFID’s approach to tackling fraud, following an increase in the potential risks after the government committed to spend 0.7% of GDP on foreign aid.
Health and social care integration08/02/2017 11:20:00
The National Audit Office warns that progress with integration of health and social care has, to date, been slower and less successful than envisaged and has not delivered all of the expected benefits for patients, the NHS or local authorities. As a result, the government’s plan for integrated health and social care services across England by 2020 is at significant risk.
Departmental Overview 2015-16: Home Office02/02/2017 09:15:00
This Departmental Overview looks at the Home Office and summarises its performance during the year ended March 2016, together with our recent reports on it.
Investigation into Police and Firefighters’ Pension Scheme Commutation factors01/02/2017 16:15:00
This looks at the chain of events which led to the government paying £711m in compensation to 34,000 pensioners who retired from the Police and Firefighters’ Pension Schemes between 2001 and 2006 without receiving their full pension entitlement. Due to the extent of the legal process in the case, some police and firefighters were retired for over 15 years before they received their full pension entitlement from government.