|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
NEF - Restricting immigration won’t pay for working people
BLOG POSTED BY: MARC STEARS AND OLIVIER VARDAKOULIAS
If we have learnt anything so far from party conference season, it is that free movement from the European Union has fewer and fewer supporters in mainstream politics.
When it comes to immigration, Brexit is becoming hard Brexit before our eyes.
Politicians of all sides appear to believe the communities that voted to Leave the EU have legitimate concerns about immigration’s impact on their living standards.
Immigration restrictions, it is suggested, will benefit working people, especially by significantly increasing their pay.
But this isn’t true.
An increase in immigration restrictions would, in fact, do very little to benefit workers in these communities.
If you look at data from the counties of the UK, you see that there is no correlation between increases in immigration and decreases in real wages of less skilled occupations. And there’s no correlation either between increases in immigration and local unemployment rates.
In fact, we might go even further. Restrictions on free movement may actually reduce wages and workers’ standards.
Because we know from history that immigration doesn’t stop when it becomes harder. Just look at Mexico and the United States. If more EU nationals enter the UK undocumented, they will be working outside official channels, labour laws and the official minimum wage.
And workers who are granted a visa by their employer (the current process for migrants from outside the EU) will be at the mercy of that employer.
Companies will have the power to hire and fire migrants and withdraw their working permit at will, leaving migrant workers with an even weaker bargaining power over their wages and working conditions.
So ending free movement may in reality put domestic workers in a more unfavourable situation than they are in now.
Restricting immigration from the EU is a false panacea for communities who have struggled over the last decades.
Politicians of all parties would do well to avoid selling this snake oil of a solution to the working people of Britain.
Latest News from
IFS - Use new Budget as a springboard for wider tax policy reform19/01/2017 11:35:00
To reduce taxpayer confusion, cut down costly errors and avoid embarrassing u-turns, the Government must change the way it makes tax and budget decisions, argues a new report. The current tax policy making process is not fit for purpose.
RUSI - New Initiative to Explore FinTech and Financial Crime19/01/2017 10:35:00
RUSI’s Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies will host the first meeting of the FinTech and Fincrime Exchange (FFE), a new initiative to promote an increased understanding of financial crime by the FinTech industry.
JRF - Response to ONS Inflation Figures19/01/2017 09:35:00
Helen Barnard, Head of Analysis at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, responded to the recent inflation figures from the ONS,
NIESR Researchers react to Theresa May’s Brexit speech18/01/2017 12:20:00
Senior members of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research offered their reactions following the PM’s speech on Brexit.