|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Parliament advocates a centralised EU asylum system and legal ways to migrate
A centralised asylum system would allow the EU to better manage flows of migrants and asylum seekers, said the European Parliament on Tuesday. It also asked for safe and legal ways to be found for third country nationals to enter the Union without resorting to human smugglers at the risk of their lives.
In a non-binding resolution, MEPs acknowledge the failure of the EU asylum system to cope with ever-rising numbers of migrant arrivals and call for a radical overhaul of the so-called Dublin rules. They propose establishing a central system for collecting and allocating asylum applications. The scheme, which could include a quota for each EU member state, would work on the basis of “hotspots” from which refugees would be distributed.
The European Commission is currently considering a revision of the Dublin III Regulation (which determines which member state is responsible for processing which asylum application) and has pledged to present a legislative proposal before the summer.
“There is no quick fix for migration, no magic silver bullet. We do not need more emergency solutions, we need a sustainable approach for the future”, said Ms Metsola during the plenary debate.
"Migration should not be combatted, it should be managed”, added Ms Kyenge, insisting that the European approach should be based on solidarity and responsibility sharing.
Parliament underlines that the current asylum system does not take proper account of the particular migratory pressures faced by member states with EU external borders. MEPs demand changes to ensure fairness and shared responsibility, solidarity and swift processing of applications.
Relocation and resettlement
The text calls on member states to fulfil their obligations with regard to urgent relocation measures, stressing that so far, only a minimal part of the 106,000 asylum seekers awaiting reassignment from Italy and Greece to other EU countries had actually been relocated. On resettlement, MEPs insist that the EU needs a “binding and mandatory legislative approach”.
MEPs demand new EU-wide “readmission” (return) agreements which they say should take precedence over bilateral ones between member states and third countries. They insist that migrants should be returned only if the country to which they are being returned to is safe for them.
Latest News from
How certain are you? Help us to better explain scientific uncertainty25/02/2017 08:10:00
Can you help us? We are running a survey to help us improve how EFSA communicates and explains the scientific uncertainties related to its assessments. The survey is being jointly run with our partners in eight EU Member States: Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Romania, Spain and the UK.
Only a strong economy can allow Europe to weather the storm24/02/2017 16:10:00
EESC proposes fostering economic growth and "beyond-GDP" indicators.
EU must take lead in linking trade in agriculture with the SDGs24/02/2017 14:05:00
Time to breathe new life into the WTO process. Trade in agriculture and in agricultural products has never been so important – or so controversial.
Local leaders urge concerted international action to stabilise Mediterranean24/02/2017 12:20:00
Local and regional leaders from across the Mediterranean and the European Union have urged national governments and the international community to work more closely with mayors and governors to help stabilise North Africa and the Middle East.