CIVITAS - Trade advantages of the EU are "imaginary"
6 May 2014 10:27 AM
• The Single Market has failed to benefit
UK trade, new analysis shows
• British exports to EU members have grown
slower than those of many non-EU countries
• UK trade with European
nations outside the EU has increased
dramatically
Britain's membership of the European Union is shown
to have had no positive impact on trade with other members in a detailed
analysis of UK exports published yesterday by the cross-party think tank
Civitas.
A
painstaking study of British export figures since 1960 exposes the "empty
rhetoric" behind oft-repeated claims that the EU gives the UK an essential
trade advantage.
Britain's trade with other EU nations accounts for
no more of its trade with all leading economies than it did on joining the
European Economic Community in 1973, the report shows. Meanwhile, exports to
non-EU nations Iceland, Norway and Switzerland have increased enormously over
the same period.
"While the share of UK exports to fellow EU members
has been virtually stable, the share going to non-members in Europe has risen
steadily, leading one to suspect that both insider advantages and outsider
disadvantages are imaginary," the report's author, Michael Burrage,
writes.
"Thus far, the Single Market has not enabled UK
exports of goods or services to other members to grow at a faster rate than
those of non-member exporters, nor at a faster rate than UK exports to
non-member markets. It has been an era of decline for UK exporters, relative to
both non-members in the same market, and to UK exports to other
markets."
Burrage has held academic positions at the London School
of Economics and Harvard, has conducted research for Ernst & Young and NTT
and is now a director of Cimigo, which conducts market and corporate strategy
research in China, India and throughout South-East Asia.
In
yesterday's report - 'Where's The Insider Advantage? A comparative
study of UK exports to EU and non-EU nations between 1960 and 2012' - he
conducts a meticulous examination of OECD figures which demonstrates
how:
• UK goods exports to the other 14 pre-2004 EU
nations have not increased as a proportion of its trade with OECD nations since
Britain joined the European Economic Community in 1973 (Finding 1,
p.66);
• UK services exports have also not improved as a
share of trade with OECD nations since 1999, which is as far back as
comparisons can go (Finding 2, p.66);
• The proportion of UK goods exported to non-EU
Iceland, Norway and Switzerland has doubled from 5.1% in 1973 to 10.7% in 2012.
Services exports to these nations trebled from 6.1% to 20.2% over the same
period (Finding 3, p.66);
• The UK ranks only 28th in a list of the
world's 35 fastest-growing exporters to the other 11 founding members of
the Single Market (Finding 4, p.66);
• UK exports to the other 11 Single Market founders
grew at a markedly faster rate prior to the Single Market - by 192% during the
20 Common Market years compared with 80% in the 19 subsequent years (Finding 7,
p.67);
• UK goods exports to non-EU countries have grown
at a much faster pace than those to other founder members of the Single Market
(Finding 11, p.68);
• There is no evidence that the 'clout' of
the EU has helped secure more free trade agreements (FTAs): there were 25 EU
FTAs in force in 2012 while the Swiss had independently negotiated 26, 14 of
which came into force before those of the EU, and three in the same year
(Finding 13, p.68);
• Neither are the EU's FTAs better than those
of Switzerland: 20 of the Swiss FTAs include services, compared with only seven
of the EU's FTAs - the Swiss FTAs appear to be far more effective at
increasing Swiss exports (Finding 14, p.68).
Burrage says the evidence contradicts those claiming
Britain has enjoyed an insider advantage from its EU
membership.
"The growth of UK exports to other founder members
of the Single Market was low when compared with UK exports prior to its launch,
when compared with the exports of goods of 27 non-members to the other founder
members of the Single Market, and when compared with the exports of services of
21 non-members to the other founder members. It was also low when compared to
UK exports to non-member countries.
"To accept the idea that, despite the absence of
prima facie evidence of insider advantages, the UK exporters have nonetheless
benefited from them obliges one to accept some scarcely credible,
counter-factual propositions."
The
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has claimed that the UK and
other EU countries trade twice as much with each other as they would do in the
absence of the Single Market.
But
Burrage says: "To present it as a success, in the manner of the UK
Department of Business, Innovation & Skills' recent portrayal of the
doubling of exports to new member countries, or to claim it is a prized
achievement, or a 'privilege', or 'a vital national interest'
that must be defended at all costs, only sounds vaguely plausible if UK
exporters are never compared with those of other member or non-member
countries, and if their performance in the Single Market is never compared with
their performance before it existed, or with their performance in other
markets.
"Once such comparisons begin to be made, these
claims are seen to be empty rhetoric, and those who repeat them may be seen to
have been misleading themselves and others about the merits of the Single
Market. Unfortunately, constant repetition of them over recent years has
already done immense harm, since they have discouraged close investigation,
measurement and analysis of the UK experience within the Single Market. We
have, therefore, still not begun to understand what has gone wrong and how it
might be fixed."
Notes
'Where's The Insider Advantage? A comparative
study of UK exports to EU and non-EU nations between 1960 and 2012' can be
accessed here.
Michael Burrage is a sociologist by training, was a
Fulbright scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, and lectured at the London
School of Economics for many years, specialising in cross-national analysis of
industrial enterprise and professional institutions. He has spells as a
research fellow at Harvard, at the Swedish Collegium of Advanced Study,
Uppsala, at the Free University of Berlin and at the Center for Higher
Education Studies and the Institute of Government of the University of
California Berkeley. He has been British Council lecturer at the University of
Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, and also a visiting professor at Kyoto, Hokkaido,
Kansai and Hosei universities in Japan.
He
has written articles in a number of American, European and Japanese
sociological journals, conducted a comparative study of telephone usage in
Tokyo, Manhattan, Paris and London for NTT, and a study of British
entrepreneurs for Ernst & Young. His recent publications
include Revolution and the Making of the Contemporary Legal
Profession: England, France and the United States (OUP) 2006
and Class Formation, Civil Society and the State: A comparative
analysis of Russia, France,the United States and England(Palgrave
Macmillan) 2008.
For
further information and interview bids contact:
Daniel Bentley
T:
0207 799 6677
M:
07715 770352
E:
daniel.bentley@civitas.org.uk
Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil
Society is an independent, cross-party think tank that facilitates informed
public debate on important issues of the day. It is not affiliated to any
political party and receives no state funding
Visit our homepage, read our blog, follow us on Twitter