Eric Pickles takes action to defend the independent free press
17 Apr 2014 01:07 PM
Five councils have a fortnight to explain
Publicity Code breaches before the Secretary of State issues legal
directions.
Five councils have been given a fortnight to explain why
steps should not be taken to stop their “propaganda on the rates”,
Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles announced today (17 April
2014).
Formal
letters have been sent to 5 London boroughs triggering the first legal
steps the Secretary of State can now take to require compliance with thePublicity Code for local authorities, under the new Local Audit
and Accountability Act.
The
code sets a range of provisions in relation to local authority publicity
including the frequency, content and appearance of taxpayer-funded news-sheets.
This includes limiting publication to prevent competition with local
newspapers, obliging councils to be cost effective and objective in any
publicity material they publish.
Parliament passed the new Act after ongoing concerns
that a small number of local authorities were breaching the publicity code,
originally introduced under Margaret Thatcher’s government. Strengthening
these provisions was in the Coalition
Agreement published in 2010, reflecting policy commitments made by
both coalition parties before the general election.
The
action is been taken against the municipal newspapers of Greenwich Time,
Hackney Today, the Newham mag, Waltham Forest News and (Tower Hamlets’)
East End Life. The councils now have a fortnight to show why a direction is not
necessary. Any council that does not follow the legal direction could end up
facing a court order requiring compliance.
This is part of a series of measures to protect local
democracy and enhance local scrutiny. The new provisions of the Local Audit and
Accountability Act 2014 have been used to initiate an investigation into the probity of the controversial mayoral
administration in Tower Hamlets. New powers will also shortly enhance
the rights of the press and public to report council meetings using digital and
social media, following cases where members of the public have been threatened
with arrest for reporting council meetings.
These measures build on the Localism Act
2011 which protected councillors’ free speech by changing the
law on ‘predetermination’ which was being used to prevent
councillors from campaigning on local issues and by scrapping a quango that was
being used to bully councillors who blew the whistle on waste and corruption.
The new rules today do not affect party political campaigning using private
funds.
Mr
Pickles said:
It
is scandalous that bloggers have been handcuffed for tweeting from council
meetings, while propaganda on the rates drives the free press out of business.
Only Putin would be proud of a record like that.
Localism needs robust and independent scrutiny by the
press and public, and municipal state-produced newspapers suppress that.
‘Town Hall Pravdas’ not only waste taxpayers’ money
unnecessarily, they undermine free speech.
I
have given written notice to councils most clearly breaching the Publicity
Code, noting that Parliament has passed new laws to tackle this abuse. We are
prepared to take further action against any council that undermines local
democracy - whatever the political colour.
We
have changed the law to protect the free speech of councillors. If councillors
and political parties want to campaign and put out political literature, they
are very welcome to do so, and it’s an important part of our democratic
process. But they should be using their own money, rather than
taxpayers.
Further information
The recommended code of practice on local authority
publicity applies to all decisions by local authorities relating to
taxpayer-funded paid advertising and leaflet campaigns, publication of free
newspapers and news-sheets and maintenance of websites – including the
hosting of material which is created by third parties. It states that publicity
by local authorities should:
- be
lawful
- be
cost effective
- be
objective
- be
even-handed
- be
appropriate
- have regard to equality and diversity
- be
issued with care during periods of heightened sensitivity
It
does not inhibit publicity produced by political parties or councillors at
their own expense.
The Local Audit
and Accountability Act 2014 gives the Secretary of State the power to
direct a local authority to comply with some, or all, of the provisions of the
recommended code of practice on local authority publicity. This code applies to
all local authorities in England. The process for issuing a direction is for
the Secretary of State to first give notice in writing to the authority of the
proposed direction so the authorities can make any relevant representations.
After that 14 day period has elapsed, the Secretary of State may then issue the
direction. If the direction is not complied with, a person having appropriate
interest (such as a council taxpayer, elector, or a councillor of the authority
concerned, or the Secretary of State), may seek a court order requiring
compliance with the direction. Non-compliance with a court order may be
contempt of court.
Having regard to the information available to him the
Secretary of State intends to direct the councils written to today to comply by
no later than 1 May 2014 with the specified provisions of the recommended code
of practice on local authority publicity issued under section 4 of the Local
Government Act 1986 on 31 March 2011 which was approved by a
resolution of each House of Parliament.
On
objectivity the code states that:
Local authorities should ensure that publicity relating
to policies and proposals from central government is balanced and factually
accurate. Such publicity may set out the local authority’s views and
reasons for holding those views, but should avoid anything likely to be
perceived by readers as constituting a political statement, or being a
commentary on contentious areas of public policy.
On
even-handedness the code states that:
Where local authority publicity addresses matters of
political controversy it should seek to present the different positions in
relation to the issue in question in a fair manner.
On
appropriate publicity the code states that:
Local authorities should not publish or incur
expenditure in commissioning in hard copy or on any website, newsletters,
newssheets or similar communications which seek to emulate commercial
newspapers in style or content. Where local authorities do commission or
publish newsletters, news-sheets or similar communications, they should not
issue them more frequently than quarterly, apart from parish councils which
should not issue them more frequently than monthly. Such communications should
not include material other than information for the public about the business,
services and amenities of the council or other local service
providers.
The
following table set out which councils have been written to and for what
reason:
Local authority |
Required compliance |
Alleged form of non-compliance |
The
Royal Borough of Greenwich |
Comply with all provisions in the Code by 1
May |
Not
objective, not even-handed, ‘Greenwich Time’ is published 50 times
a year |
The
London Borough of Hackney |
Comply with the Code’s provisions on frequency of
publication by 1 May |
‘Hackney Today’ is published
fortnightly |
The
London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council |
Comply with all provisions in the Code by 1
May |
Not
objective, not even-handed, ‘East End life’ is published
weekly |
Newham Council |
Comply with all provisions in the Code by 1
May |
Not
even–handed, ‘the Newham mag’ is published
fortnightly |
The
London Borough of Waltham Forest |
Comply with all provisions in the Code by 1
May |
Not
even-handed, ‘Waltham Forest News’ is published
fortnightly |