Government needs an intervention template before projecting military force again
28 Apr 2014 11:38 AM
The Government must
describe the circumstances in which the UK would intervene militarily in the
future, says the Defence Committee in its report, ‘Intervention:
Why, When and How?’ The public needs to know that the UK will deploy
forces only as part of a considered national
strategy.
Intervention
A strategic and well-articulated
vision of the UK’s position in the world and the level of influence it is
able to exert would lead to more rational decisions on whether or not to
intervene as well as a better public understanding of the rationale for any
such future decision. It would also assist in identifying the strategic
objective of such operations, contributing to a more coherent UK foreign,
defence and security policy.
Chair's
comments
Chair of the Committee, Rt Hon
James Arbuthnot MP, said:
“The British people are
suspicious of the motivation for deploying troops to certain situations but not
others. We need to see, in the next Defence and Security Review, a definition
of the circumstances in which the UK might intervene in future and the legal
basis for such interventions in order to ensure a successful outcome and full
public support. The Government also needs to be more forthright in stating the
consequences of non-intervention when it decides to
intervene”.
Adaptable
posture
The Committee supports the
Government’s adoption of an “adaptable posture” in the 2010
Strategic Defence and Security Review. The threats to UK national security
remain uncertain and unpredictable and it is important that the Government and
UK Armed Forces retain the flexibility to deal with them. The 2010 National
Security Strategy said that the national security apparatus had focused on
non-state actors and that the current main national security threat was from
international terrorism. These threats remain, but the Committee calls on the
Government to ensure that the next National Security Strategy gives due weight
to the likelihood of a return to an increased threat of state versus state
conflict and that decisions on the force structure, manpower, equipment and
capability in the next Defence and Security Review ensure that UK Armed Forces
are able to meet these threats. The NATO Summit in September 2014 provides an
opportunity for consideration of the future role of NATO in providing
collective security against these
threats.
Parliament's
role
The role of Parliament in
deciding to deploy UK Armed Forces into conflict situations has been
effectively changed by the vote against military action in Syria. The
Government needs to resolve the balance between Parliament’s essential
role as a strategic inquisitor on military deployments and the use of the Royal
Prerogative in conflict decisions. The Government should intensify its efforts
to resolve this matter. But the Government must not wait until the next
possible military deployment to do this. The Government should commit to
ensuring that a summary of the legal justification on military action is
available to Parliament in advance of any such debate.
Exit
strategies
Interventions bring with them
responsibilities in respect of defining exit strategies and desired outcomes
which will invariably take longer than anticipated to achieve. Securing the
peace is as important an objective as winning the war. The Government should
set out in the next National Security Strategy and the next Defence and
Security Review how it intends to define and assess successful exit strategies
and end states.