Minimum pricing will be heard in Europe

30 Apr 2014 04:44 PM

Court delivers opinion on “precedent-setting” case

The case to implement a minimum unit price of alcohol in Scotland is to be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union, it was announced yesterday.

The Inner House of the Court of Session delivered its opinion to both parties.

Health Secretary Alex Neil welcomed the referral from the courts and stressed that it was right this “precedent-setting case” was considered by the European Court of Justice, the highest authority on EU law.

He said: “The Scottish Government has always believed that minimum unit pricing is the right thing to do and will save lives. Scotland has a difficult relationship with alcohol and we need to urgently take action to tackle this problem that puts a huge burden on our society.

“The evidence shows that minimum unit pricing is an effective way to tackle alcohol-related harm. This is because it targets heavy drinkers in particular as they tend to drink the cheap, high strength alcohol that will be most affected by the policy.

“That is why I welcome the referral to European Court of Justice. Scotland is leading the way in Europe. We are confident of our case and look forward to presenting it in the European Court of Justice.

“While it is regrettable that this means we will not be able to implement minimum unit pricing sooner, we will continue our on-going and productive dialogue with EU officials. In fact, I am in Brussels today to discuss the increasing interest among other European Union members, including Ireland and Estonia, in bringing forward a minimum unit pricing policy.”

Note To Editors

Background

Following the Outer House hearing in the Court of Session last January, Lord Doherty’s judgement in May 2013 provided overwhelming support to the Scottish Government policy of minimum unit pricing.

Lord Doherty held that none of the petitioners’ challenges to the minimum unit pricing measures were well founded and that there was no proper basis for the petitioners being granted any of the remedies which they sought.

The Scotch Whisky Association’s grounds of appeal to the Inner House of the Court of Session were that Lord Doherty erred in several aspects. The appeal hearing focused on what the aim of minimum unit pricing is, whether this aim could be achieved using alcohol excise duties which would be less distortive to the free movement of goods (article 34 of TFEU) and whether the policy was proportionate to protect public health and therefore justifiable under article 36 of TFEU.

It is likely to take over a year to receive a judgement from the Court of Justice of the European Union. In 2012 the average length of preliminary reference proceedings from the date of the reference to the date of the judgement was 15.7 months.

Irish Health Minister Alex White TD, on introducing minimum pricing in the Irish Public Health (Alcohol) Bill, October 2013 - “The Government has recognised the severe consequences of the misuse of alcohol – including deaths, injuries and social and financial problems – and has determined to take action to address this problem. The package of measures…will include provision for minimum unit pricing for alcohol products and the regulation of advertising and marketing of alcohol.” (Health Department Press Release, 24 October 2013)

Mr. Taavi Rõivas, previously Minister of Social Affairs and now Prime Minister of the Republic of Estonia said: “Estonia shares Scotland’s concern over the negative impact of alcohol on health and we have similar problems in this field…We will continue to monitor the international evidence for minimum pricing and analyse the possibilities and the impacts of establishing minimum pricing in Estonia. It is essential for member countries to use the most effective measures possible to solve important public health problems.” (28 October 2013)

Key Statistics