Financial Services Authority
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
FSA publishes guidance consultation to help firms provide redress to victims of PPI mis-selling
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) today published proposed guidance for firms that sold payment protection insurance (PPI) and are beginning to contact customers who may have been mis-sold a policy but have yet to complain.
The guidance outlines steps firms should take when writing to these customers. It stresses the importance of these communications explaining clearly why the customer may have been mis-sold and could be entitled to redress, what the customer should do to respond to the firm, the time limits involved and the need to act promptly.
The letters are part of a process being undertaken by PPI firms to establish what caused the large number of complaints; this is called ‘root cause analysis’. When an FSA authorised firm identifies recurring or systemic problems in its sales processes it is required to correct them. The firm should consider what action it may need to take to treat fairly affected customers that have not complained – including contacting them and giving them the opportunity to claim redress.
The proposed guidance sets out the FSA’s expectations that the letters should be clear, fair and not misleading, and include a clear explanation of the following:
that the letter contains important information and should be read carefully;
that the customer may have been mis-sold;
the specific failings that led the firm to believe the customer may have been mis-sold;
that the customer may have suffered a financial loss and could be entitled to redress; and
that the letter requires careful and immediate consideration and there is a time limit for making a complaint.
The FSA is also asking firms to ensure these letters are free from financial jargon or marketing material. The guidance consultation stresses the importance of keeping records of any response from the customer and the subsequent actions taken by the firm.
As well as providing guidance on the content of the customer contact letters, the FSA is also clarifying when and how firms might decide that a complaint is ‘time barred’.
Normally, customers have six years from a sale to complain or, if later, three years from when they became aware (or ought to have become aware) that they had cause for complaint. When a complaint is made outside this limit, the firm is no longer obliged to consider it and can reject it; the Financial Ombudsman Service may also dismiss a complaint made outside these time limits.
With firms beginning to send letters to customers, the FSA is acting now to ensure these letters are easy to understand, contain clear notice of a potential mis-sale, and the time limits involved.
Martin Wheatley, FSA managing director, commented:
“This is important guidance and marks a key moment in the story of PPI. So far the majority of payouts have been for complaints received before, or put on hold during, the judicial review. However, we are now beginning to see firms considering how to treat customers who were mis-sold but have not complained.
“We think that the redress due from this process may well exceed what has been paid so far, and that is why we are acting now to clarify our expectations. By ensuring that firms are clear about the problems they have identified and the potential redress due, we are aiming to prevent people running out of time if they choose to complain.
“Historically, response rates for these types of exercises are low - sometimes as low as one in ten. Therefore, if you receive a letter, it’s important to consider your PPI purchase carefully and if you feel you have been a victim of poor practice - please do respond to the firm.
"The British Bankers' Association and Association of Finance Brokers have both indicated their strong support for the guidance, and - along with consumer group, Which? - have also been in discussions with the FSA to try and reach agreement on how best firms can communicate with affected customers, both in the context of these contact exercises and PPI more generally. These are encouraging moves."
Notes for editors
Further information on PPI sales, complaints and redress paid:
Redress paid in 2011 - £1.9 billion (source: FSA monthly statistics on PPI redress)
Estimated total number of policies sold since 2005 (not including regular premium PPI on first charge mortgages) - 16.1m (source: FSA Consultation Paper 10/6)
Estimated total value of PPI policies sold since 2005 - approximately £17bn (not including regular premium PPI on first charge mortgages) (source: FSA Consultation Paper 10/6)
Estimated total value of PPI policies sold 2001-2004 – £16.9bn (source: Competition Commission, ‘Market investigation into payment protection insurance’, January 2009)
The FSA regulates the financial services industry and has four objectives under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: maintaining market confidence; securing the appropriate degree of protection for consumers; fighting financial crime; and contributing to the protection and enhancement of the stability of the UK financial system.
Latest News from
Financial Services Authority
The FCA has yesterday published Decision Notices in respect of three former members of Keydata’s senior management: Stewart Ford, Mark Owen and Peter Johnson27/05/2015 09:20:00
The FCA has yesterday published Decision Notices in respect of three former members of Keydata’s senior management: Stewart Ford (former chief executive), Mark Owen (former sales director) and Peter Johnson (former compliance officer).
FCA publishes terms of reference for its investment and corporate banking market study25/05/2015 10:15:00
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has set out the issues it will focus on as part of its market study into competition in investment and corporate banking.
FCA review highlights gap between insurance claims service and SMEs’ expectations24/05/2015 09:10:00
A Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) review of insurance claims handling for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has found the claims service is not consistently working in the interests of many businesses, resulting in a poor claims experience.
The Financial Conduct Authority warns clients of three debt management firms to review their debts23/05/2015 09:10:00
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is warning customers of three debt management firms to check their debt situation with their creditors and find out exactly what they owe. The debt management firms are Sterling Financial Security Limited (Sterling), Haydon Associates Debt Management Consultants Limited (Haydon) and Clear View Finance Limited (Clear View). All three firms are based in Lichfield.