Wired-GOV Newswire (news from other organisations)
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
MPs publish report on reducing errors in the benefits system
The Commons Public Accounts Committee conclude that the cost of errors in the benefits system is considerable in a report published today.
The Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Chair of the Committee of Public Accounts, today said:
"The cost of errors in the benefits system is considerable and hasn't improved for years. Staff and customer mistakes resulted in more than £2 billion of benefits being overpaid and £1.3 billion being underpaid to claimants in 2009-10. People aren’t getting the money they’re entitled to and the taxpayer is losing out on money paid when it should not have been.
The DWP must improve its performance if it is to meet its target of reducing the total cost of fraud and error by 25 per cent by 2015. We know the Government intends to simplify the benefits system but the changes won't start before 2013, so the Department must act now to deal with these problems. What concerns us is that the Department still lacks a clear plan of action, including a way of measuring progress.
The Department's focus is entirely on its own losses due to fraud and error and not underpayments to poor people who depend on the benefits to which they’re entitled. There is no target for reducing underpayments but it is essential that the Department does not neglect this problem.
What is clear is that the Department must get better at learning the lessons from what works.
The Department's accounts have been qualified for 22 years because of the amount of money involved in fraud and error. It must work to get its house in order."
Margaret Hodge was speaking as the Committee published its 25th Report of this Session.
The benefits system is large and complex. There are around 30 different types of benefits and pensions, and £148 billion was paid out to 20 million people in 2009-10. The Department for Work and Pensions estimates that £2.2 billion of overpayments and £1.3 billion of underpayments were made in 2009-10 as a result of administrative errors by its staff and mistakes by customers.
Whilst the value of these errors as a proportion of total benefit expenditure is low, the amounts involved are still very significant sums of public money and have contributed to the Department's accounts being qualified for 22 consecutive years.
The Committee took evidence from the Comptroller and Auditor General looking at administrative and customer error in the benefits system. The Committee found that efforts to tackle error have had little success: despite the Department introducing a strategy to reduce errors in 2007, levels of error have remained constant since then.
The Committee recognise the difficulty of reducing error, given the complexity of the benefits system and the volume of payments being processed. The publication of a joint HM Revenue and Customs and Department for Work and Pensions fraud and error strategy in October 2010, along with additional funding of £425 million over four years, is an opportunity to inject a new impetus.
The joint target of a 25% reduction in the cost of overpayments from fraud and error by 2015 is challenging, and whilst the Committee acknowledge the efforts being made by the Department, there is still concern that there is not yet a clear plan of action to achieve it which sets out specific interventions and milestones to monitor progress.
Importantly, the Department has not addressed underpayments, despite the hardship that benefit underpayments can create for people in need, and it is critical the Department does not neglect this.
The Department must ensure that interventions to reduce error are targeted where they are most likely to get the greatest return. The Department has undertaken some work to understand the cost and impact of its measures to reduce error, but this has been neither comprehensive nor complete. In order for the Department to manage its programme of interventions cost-effectively, it must develop a rigorous approach to costing its interventions and assessing how each will contribute to the target.
Progress on reducing error requires a better understanding of where and why errors arise, and a greater focus on preventing errors occurring in the first place. The Department is not making use of all available sources of information, such as calls to advice lines or feedback from quality checking teams, to identify the reasons why staff make mistakes and where guidance and training efforts should be directed as a result.
Greater use of risk profiling would help identify which customers are most likely to make mistakes on their benefit claims, allowing interventions to be targeted more effectively.
Wider welfare reforms have the potential to reduce errors in the long term by simplifying benefits administration, but waiting for the implementation of the Universal Credit is not an option. The reforms will not be implemented in time to contribute much towards the 2015 target, and it is therefore essential that the Department maintain its current focus on getting error levels down now.
Latest News from
Wired-GOV Newswire (news from other organisations)
The UK must prioritise a single hub airport with spare capacity to support trade - CBI01/09/2014 12:25:43
Decision must support UK’s emerging market air links. Having a single UK hub with spare capacity to add new routes is critical to the UK’s long-term sustainable growth, according to a new CBI report.
Copeland in the Lake District is last place left in England with ‘easily affordable’ housing01/09/2014 10:15:20
Copeland in the Lake District is the last local authority area left in England where the average house price is less than three times the average annual salary, according to new analysis published today (Monday) by the TUC.
The economic case for independence hasn't been made - CBI President Sir Mike Rake29/08/2014 10:20:00
Just three weeks out from the Scottish Referendum, Sir Mike Rake told an audience of business leaders that the CBI has a right and a duty to raise questions about issues of legitimate interest for businesses, workers and citizens across the UK. The question is not whether an independent Scotland would survive outside the UK but whether it would prosper, he said.