Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Government should be open about 'outsourced emissions' according to Committee.
The Government should be straightforward about the impact that UK consumption is having on the world's climate, according to a report from the Energy and Climate Change Committee.
The MPs warn that:
- UK's record on cutting greenhouse gases is not as good as DECC figures suggest
- Carbon dioxide emissions from imported goods consumed in the UK are going up faster than Government is cutting CO2 at home
- Government figures on consumption-based emissions - from imported goods - show that carbon dioxide emissions in 2009 were 20% higher than in 1990.
Tim Yeo MP, Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, said:
"Successive governments have claimed to be cutting climate-changing emissions, but in fact a lot of pollution has simply been outsourced overseas.
The Department for Energy and Climate Change likes to argue that the UK is only responsible for 2% of the world's CO2 emissions, but the Government’s own research shows this not to be the case.
We get through more consumer goods than ever before in the UK and this is pushing up emissions in manufacturing countries like China."
The Department for Energy and Climate Change's (DECC) official CO2 figures - that count territorial emissions from power stations and transport, etc, within UK borders - show nearly 20% reduction between 1990–2009. But research commissioned by the Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) reveals that CO2 emissions were 20% higher in 2009 if consumption based emissions - from imported goods - are included.
The fall in territorial emissions was not mainly the consequence of the Government's climate policy, according to the report. Rather it was the result of the shift in manufacturing industries away from the UK and the switch from coal to gas-fired electricity generation that began in the early 1990s. Since 1990 carbon dioxide emissions from imports have almost doubled (from 166 million tonnes (Mt) CO2 to 331 Mt CO2 in 2009).
If the UK wishes to encourage emissions reductions in countries that manufacture and export goods to the UK, the MPs say the Government should recognise the growth in the UK's consumption-based emissions. Acknowledging that UK consumption is driving up territorial emissions in other countries could increase the UK's leverage over those emissions and help to secure a binding global agreement on carbon cuts.
Tim Yeo MP added:
"The UK can scarcely lecture countries like China for failing to sign up to binding emissions cuts when much of their pollution is produced making products for us and other high-consumption economies.
We are not saying that consumption emissions should form the basis of a new global climate treaty, but a more honest approach about our contribution to rising CO2 levels could help to break the stalemate."
The report concludes that the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) should no longer rely exclusively on territorial emissions as its primary policy driver. There is sufficiently robust data available to develop new policy options and identify carbon-intensive behaviours that are overlooked by concentrating on territorial emissions alone. Ministers should explore the options for incorporating consumption-based emissions data in to the policy making process and setting emissions targets on a consumption-basis at the national level.
Tim Yeo MP said:
"Without a complete picture of the UK’s impact on the global climate, DECC runs the risk of designing energy and climate change policies that produce perverse unintended consequences.
The Government should commission the Committee on Climate Change to examine how the UK could incorporate consumption emissions accounting into our climate change policy.
Better information on the emissions embedded in products could also encourage individuals and businesses to reduce their own carbon footprint."
DECC has claimed that it would be too difficult to count consumption - based emissions. However, the MPs argue that the Government should not use the uncertainties inherent to consumption-based emissions data as an excuse for inaction. The MPs point out that several local authorities are already using consumption data to inform policy making and researchers for DEFRA have calculated the UK's consumption impact with only small margin of uncertainty. The independent Committee on Climate Change - set up to advise the Government on its carbon budgets - has told the MPs that it would welcome the opportunity to explore the implications that consumption-based emissions accounting might have for the UK's carbon budgets, and that it could undertake such work after it publishes its fourth progress report on the carbon budget in June 2012.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
UK should appoint an Ambassador for the Arctic02/03/2015 00:00:00
The UK – the northernmost country below the Arctic Circle – needs to up its game or risk being ‘outmanoeuvred’ in the region by other states, says the House of Lords Arctic Committee in a report published recently. The Committee concludes that the UK should follow the example of nations including France, Singapore and Japan in appointing an Ambassador for the Arctic.
Protect FCO's budget or reduce Britain's global diplomacy01/03/2015 08:05:00
The Government must protect FCO budgets from further cuts before capacity is damaged any further, says the Foreign Affairs Committee in its report on the performance and finances of the FCO, published recently.
Committee publish Future of the BBC report27/02/2015 09:15:00
The Culture, Media and Sport Committee see no long-term future in the licence fee and set out advantages of a broadcasting levy. BBC still a valued and important feature of national life but in need of stronger governance and more challenging, independent oversight if it is to be held accountable.
EU regulation on GM Organisms not 'fit for purpose'26/02/2015 15:15:00
EU regulations that prevent genetically modified crops from being grown in the UK—even after they have passed rigorous safety testing procedures—are not fit for purpose and should be replaced with a trait-based system for regulating new crop breeding technologies, the Science and Technology Committee argues in a new report.