£164 billion stimulus needed to stave off permanently shrunken UK economy, IPPR warns Chancellor
The UK economy needs an ambitious cash injection of £164 billion in the year 2021-22, according to new analysis by IPPR, to restart it fully after the Covid crisis and set it on course for a fair, strong and green recovery.
In a far-reaching review of the economic prospect as the Chancellor prepares for this week’s spending review, IPPR warns that this is no time to be timid. There has never been a better moment to invest in the UK economy and welfare state, the think tank argues in a paper published yesterday.
Borrowing more to set the economy moving faster will actually mean lower debt as a share of GDP than the more cautious approach being urged by some, according to IPPR analysis.
The £164 billion fiscal stimulus will be needed to tackle the health crisis and stabilise the economy; deliver all the climate investments needed to reach the UK’s net zero emissions target; and restore public services to their pre-austerity level by the end of the parliament, the think tank calculates.
Failure by the Chancellor to take action to boost the economy further would risk leaving the UK on average seven percentage points behind its potential next year, the report finds – locking in what IPPR calls a “93 per cent economy”.
That would mean:
- A further 1 million people unemployed in April 2022, due to an unnecessarily slow recovery and lack of job support measures
- Failure to achieve the government’s own priorities on levelling up and meeting the UK’s net zero emissions target
- Diminishing the prospect for stronger long-term and sustainable growth of the UK economy
- A higher long-term burden of UK debt as a share of GDP - as borrowing more now for a greater fiscal stimulus would actually decrease government debt as a proportion of GDP, through faster economic growth
The report, The Chancellor's Challenge: delivering a stimulus for post-pandemic recovery, argues that this week’s spending review should consider two stages of recovery from the Covid crisis.
It says the Chancellor should provide continued fiscal support during the “rescue phase”, which IPPR says will extend through the first six months of next year – aimed at supporting incomes and preventing otherwise viable businesses from closing, as the hoped-for vaccine roll-out gets under way.
Then, during the “reopening phase” in the second half of next year, he should promise support for overall demand and economic activity.
The recovery must have economic, environmental and social justice at its heart, and include “future-proofing” the welfare state so it can better withstand future shocks.
The stimulus would mean billions of pounds extra each year for the devolved administrations in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales through additional consequential funding.
Overall, IPPR says, the government should acknowledge three broad spending priorities:
- Public investment for a greener, stronger economy – beginning by committing to invest all the additional £33bn a year which IPPR previously calculated was needed to deliver the UK’s net-zero emissions target and restore nature. Combined with a much-needed expansion of social care, this could create 1.6 million jobs over the next decade. It would put the UK on a more certain path to net-zero than the relatively modest increases announced by the government over recent months - including in the Prime Minister’s new 10-point plan.
- Strengthen the welfare state and rebuild its resilience, to better support individuals, families and the economy. That means continuing emergency measures to tackle Covid-19; boosting financial support for families as part of a “family stimulus” alongside other improvements to universal credit; investing in “catch-up” funding for health, public health and social care; and restoring spending in all other areas including grants to local government to pre-2010 trends, to reverse effects of “austerity”.
- Support businesses and workers for a stronger, fairer economy - through support for work sharing and retraining as the economy begins to reopen, and protection of businesses through financial support that is conditional on a financial, social or environmental return to the taxpayer and broader society.
Carys Roberts, IPPR Executive Director, said:
“The pandemic has had dire consequences for people’s lives – not just in health terms, but economically. Almost a million people have lost their jobs and the number of families with children using foodbanks has doubled.
“This tide of hardship will only swell without adequate support for the economy, including through ‘scarring effects’ that will make it harder for businesses and people to survive and thrive. Decisions taken today will determine whether businesses can recover, and the state and shape of the economy for years to come.
“But there is no ‘going back’ to the pre-pandemic economy, as if its course had merely been paused. Instead we should use government intervention now to build back the kinds of economic activity we really value, instead of pursuing only GDP.
“We should focus on growing the jobs and industries that will enable us to reach net-zero, fix the long-standing weaknesses in our economic model, and build a resilient welfare state to serve every family well and withstand crises of the future.”
Carsten Jung, IPPR Senior Economist, said:
“We face the extraordinary challenge of an economy permanently damaged by the pandemic – the Chancellor’s response must be commensurate with its scale. Our proposed approach will stabilise GDP, and bring back demand, jobs and dynamism into the UK economy. At the same time, it will bring about a permanent structural shift in the economy, towards sustainable production, green jobs and better work.
“Our call for a £164 billion stimulus may sound large but, in fact, it is economically the right thing to do. It’s about 40 per cent less than the government will have spent on the coronavirus crisis in the current fiscal year. And with interest rates at an historic low, our analysis shows it will actually result in a lower national debt, relative to the UK’s output, compared to a more cautious approach. We can't scrimp and save our way to paying for Covid, we can only grow our way to do so.
“In other words, as we emerge from this crisis, fiscal stimulus has become fiscal responsibility. Now is not the time to be timid.”
Carys Roberts and Carsten Jung, the paper’s co-authors, are available for interview
- David Wastell, Head of News and Communications: 07921 403651 firstname.lastname@example.org
- Robin Harvey, Digital and Media Officer: 07779 204798 email@example.com
NOTES TO EDITORS
The IPPR paper, The Chancellor's Challenge: delivering a stimulus for post-pandemic recovery by Carys Roberts and Carsten Jung, is available for download at: http://www.ippr.org/research/publications/chancellors-challenge
Modelling assumptions and full methodology are set out in an annex to the report. Figures provided are UK-wide. Implementation in some policy areas would be devolved.
Recent IPPR reports on the policy response to the coronavirus crisis can be found at https://www.ippr.org/coronavirus-response. They include:
- A Family Stimulus: Supporting children, families and the economy through the pandemic http://www.ippr.org/research/publications/a-family-stimulus
- Better than before: A Scotland built on social, economic, and climate justice https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/better-than-before-Scotland
- Transforming the economy after Covid-19: a clean, fair and resilient recovery https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/transforming-the-economy-after-covid19
- Rescue and recovery: Covid-19, jobs and income security https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/rescue-and-recovery
IPPR is the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence. www.ippr.org
Latest News from
Hiking corporation tax would be ‘illogical and counterproductive”, says IEA expert19/01/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to reports that the Chancellor Rishi Sunak is considering raising corporation tax
IPPR - UK risks EU retaliation if workers’ rights are rolled back19/01/2021 10:35:00
IPPR trade and EU relations expert says leaked proposal to cut working time protections would also be damaging and deeply unpopular
Any extension of the Universal Credit uplift should not be made permanent, says IEA expert19/01/2021 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to calls to extend the £20 a week Universal Credit uplift
King's Fund - Boost for local health partnerships as six areas secure place on £3 million grant-funding programme14/01/2021 12:35:00
Six areas in England have been chosen to join the first phase of a major grant-funding and development programme designed to improve the health and wellbeing of communities and tackle health inequalities.
IEA - JRF proposals constitute a “costly and unrealistic wish list”14/01/2021 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s report on poverty
The King’s Fund responds to Office for National Statistics deaths data for 202014/01/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund responded to the latest Office for National Statistics data on deaths in England and Wales in 2020
JRF - After a decade of deprivation, we need policies that prioritise recovery for families in poverty14/01/2021 09:35:00
In yesterday’s state of the nation report, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warns that ministers must make tackling poverty an economic priority in 2021 or they risk being defined by a record of worsening hardship.
IEA responds to Chancellor’s economic update12/01/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s economic statement