Adam Smith Inst - Let councils replace business rates with a tax on land values
Sam Bowman, Deputy Director of the Adam Smith Institute, commented on the devolution of business rates to local councils.
“What few people, including the Chancellor, seem to realise is that often, it isn’t businesses who bear the cost of business rates, but landowners. Over time, most of any cut in business rates will be offset by a proportionate rise in rents – meaning that it’s predominantly the landlords who benefit from cuts and lose out from rises, not businesses.
eg http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2658/ and http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/mirrleesreview/design/ch16.pdf. Most of the debate around yesterday’s announcement will ignore this crucial fact.
“Business rates discourage investment, because they tax the value of property, and not just the land it is built on. A better idea would be to merge the council tax and business rates systems into a simple tax on land values. This would prevent distortion between whether land is used for residential or commercial purposes, and ensure that business investment is not discouraged. Revaluations can, and should, be done on a regular basis – council tax is in particular need of a revaluation, having never been reviewed since it was first set up in 1993.
“Business rates are far from the ideal. The government would be wise to reform and simplify the current system, to address discrimination between commercial and residential land use.”
For further comments or to arrange an interview, contact Kate Andrews at email@example.com / 07584 778 207
Notes to editors:
The Adam Smith Institute is a free market, libertarian think tank based in London. It advocates classically liberal public policies to create a richer, freer world.
Latest News from
Scrap energy price cap to prevent further bailouts, says IEA Analyst26/11/2021 10:35:00
Andy Mayer, Environment, Energy and Infrastructure Analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the £1.7bn taxpayer bailout of Bulb Energy
The King’s Fund responds to the Health and Care Bill workforce vote24/11/2021 16:25:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, commented on MPs voting against a plan to require the publication of health and care workforce projections
IFS - English universities ranked on their contributions to social mobility – and the least selective post-1992 universities come out on top24/11/2021 12:10:00
Universities are seen as crucial engines of social mobility, and perhaps with good reason. Individuals eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) in year 11 who attended university are almost four times more likely to be amongst the highest 20% of earners at age 30 than those who did not, and around ten times more likely if they attended one of the four most selective universities in the country.
Government spending on social care is “unsustainable”, says IEA economist24/11/2021 11:10:00
Professor Philip Booth, Senior Academic Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Health and Care Bill vote
IPPR - NHS migrant charging system ‘unfit for purpose’ as report reveals discrimination and risks to public health24/11/2021 10:10:00
An investigation by the IPPR think tank, into the operation and impacts of the NHS England system of charging people for healthcare who are not ‘ordinarily resident’ in the UK, has revealed that the system is ‘unfit for purpose’. Interviews with NHS staff have exposed a highly complex, costly system which incentivises racial profiling.
The King's Fund responds to the social care cap change vote This content relates to the following topics:24/11/2021 09:10:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, commented on MPs voting through a change to the social care cap
Prime Minister should take note of Lord Frost’s recommendations, says IEA Director General23/11/2021 16:20:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on Lord Frost’s speech