An Increasingly Volatile International Environment Opens New Fronts for European Navies
From the Strait of Hormuz to the eastern Mediterranean, maritime tensions are pushing European states to expand their use of naval power.
With some exceptions, European responses to security crises are often just wishful thinking from risk-averse actors. But is there something changing in the mindset of the Europeans, at a time when the EU is starting to enable the development of some autonomous military capabilities? The maritime domain could well become the first operational arena where more European states will address their strategic security interests by using hard power.
In the past few weeks, there have seen significant developments in the augmentation of Europe’s naval abilities. Two decisions in particular highlight the maritime dimension as a growing field for Europe’s strategic priorities and an opportune area for internal solidarity.
First, a group of eight countries recently agreed to launch a European-led naval surveillance operation (EMASOH) in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil transit route. Four of them – France, the Netherlands, Greece, and Denmark – have already committed to deploying naval assets, with a command and control organisation which includes a force headquarters located in the UAE.
The second decision – France’s announcement that it will deploy warships to the eastern Mediterranean to help Greece ensure its sovereign rights in its standoff with Turkey – another NATO member – is of a totally different nature. However, it is another visible signal that the maritime domain is becoming a key area for the balance of power between European states and those who challenge their security interests.
These two decisions are inserting European navies into theaters, where the possibility of confrontations with states of significant military capabilities – Iran and Turkey, respectively – cannot be totally excluded.
There is an acceptance of risks significantly higher than those encountered in the EU’s naval operations to date, operations ATALANTA (combating Somali pirates) and SOPHIA (EUNAVFORMED). Although France has solid experience in high-end naval operations (e.g. the 2011 Libya campaign or the naval precision strikes against the chemical installations of the Syrian regime in April 2018 in an Anti-Access/Area Denial environment), the same cannot be said for many European countries. For most of the participating countries, these new missions are a significant step up from the current European naval operations mandated to combat illegal immigration, trafficking, and piracy.
Variable European Arrangements
If these new naval operations in higher-risk environments are a bellwether of a new collective will across Europe to step up and deploy hard-power, they also highlight issues. The fact that the European Maritime Surveillance Mission in the Straits of Hormuz and the French-Greek naval cooperation in the Mediterranean are not under the auspices of the European Union is noteworthy.
These patterns of cooperation are closer to the spirit of the European Intervention Initiative (EI2) proposed by Emmanuel Macron to his European partners in 2017. It is noticeable that one of the most committed European countries in the EMASOH is Denmark, which has an opt-out clause in the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy, but is fully part of the EI2.
It will now remain to be seen how this could be an incentive for more European countries to increase their involvement in the tougher side of the maritime security, and possibly for the EU as a whole to practice this kind of operations as a component of its 2014 maritime security strategy.
What Place For The Uk?
The decisions have laid bare the question of what role the UK – a signatory nation of the EI2 – could or should play in European naval operations post-Brexit. It would be unfortunate if at exactly the time when European navies are taking on more serious crisis management missions, the Royal Navy, with its capabilities well-formated to deal with high-intensity conflicts, would begin working in parallel rather than in concert with European missions. In the Strait of Hormuz European and British forces will be operating separately in the same area and we undoubtedly lose resources efficiency as a result.
But with or without Britain, we can bet that, for the Europeans, whose prosperity relies on sea lines of communications, especially from Suez to beyond the straits of Malacca, the maritime domain will become a laboratory for their defence and security initiatives. The issue is that this domain offers the most serious risk of physical confrontation and escalation due to the proximity of maneuvering naval assets.
It remains to be seen if the Europeans are finally becoming more strategically assertive, or if this is simply another case of naval saber-rattling.
The views expressed in this Commentary are the author’s, and do not represent those of RUSI or any other institution.
Latest News from
Challenges to Gender Equality in the Security Sector10/04/2020 09:15:00
Recognition of International Women’s Day has been growing in recent years, with more using the day to highlight obstacles remaining to gender equality.
Diversion, Diagnoses and Delays: Why Russia Seeks to Control the Coronavirus Narrative09/04/2020 14:25:00
For Russia, control of the coronavirus narrative is designed to ensure President Vladimir Putin continues to be cast as the guarantor of security, as well as to prevent mass panic that could lead to political destabilisation.
Britain Beyond the Pandemic: A Resilient Legal Framework08/04/2020 13:05:00
The legal framework empowering the British government in fighting the current pandemic needs to be made more predictable and robust.
Defence Sector Corruption, an Underestimated Foe in Times of Crisis07/04/2020 15:05:00
The NRLA has six template letters exclusive for members to download and send to tenants during the coronavirus pandemic.
Europe and the Coronavirus Pandemic in the Middle East07/04/2020 13:20:00
The pandemic preoccupies Europe. But the continent should not lose sight of potential new crises in the Middle East.
Red Lines and Red Tape – How the UK Should Deal with Russia06/04/2020 14:48:00
Relations with Russia are one of the thorniest challenges for the UK’s Integrated Review. Here are a few ideas on how the UK should approach its troubled relationship with Moscow.
As NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announces the appointment of a group of experts to support his work in further strengthening the Alliance’s political dimension, this Commentary identifies six primary challenges.
Data-Driven Responses to the Coronavirus Pandemic and the Privacy Implications03/04/2020 14:25:00
Many states are using data in innovative ways to tackle the spread of the coronavirus.