Asylum seekers plan draws ‘false distinction’ between groups and risks breaking international law, says IPPR
Think tank warns Home Office proposals risk putting more migrants at risk of exploitation and abuse, and calls for ‘humanitarian visa’ alternative
The Institute for Public Policy Research think tank has responded to the government's announcement of a new two-tier system of rights for asylum seekers, with their claims assessed based on how they arrive in the UK.
Marley Morris, associate director of IPPR who heads the think tank’s work on migration, said:
“These proposals draw a false distinction between people who make spontaneous asylum applications in the UK and those entering on to resettlement schemes.
“The home secretary has said she wants to learn the lessons of Windrush and deliver a compassionate immigration system that puts people first. Yet the reforms proposed risk marginalising the people most in need of protection.
“Often there is simply no way for people to become a refugee through regular means. To create a separate refugee route with fewer rights for people who enter the UK via Calais will simply force them into more vulnerable situations, undermine their opportunities for integration, and further complicate an already labyrinthine system.
“There is also a risk that the proposals break international law - in particular Article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention, which states that parties "shall not impose penalties" on refugees on account of their illegal entry or presence, provided they have good cause and present themselves to the authorities without delay.
“It is positive that the government plans to continue its resettlement programme. But we should be more ambitious and look towards alternative safe and legal routes for asylum, in order to stop the channel crossings and save lives.
“In particular, humanitarian visas could provide a safe way for people to enter the UK to claim asylum, reducing the need for people to make dangerous journeys across the Channel.”
Marley Morris, IPPR associate director and Amreen Qureshi, IPPR researcher are available for interview
- David Wastell, Head of News and Communications: 07921 403651 firstname.lastname@example.org
- Robin Harvey, Digital and Media Officer:07779 204798 email@example.com
NOTES TO EDITORS
- IPPR’s proposals for reforming the ‘hostile environment’ were published in February and can be read at: https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/beyond-the-hostile-environment
IPPR is the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence.www.ippr.org
Latest News from
JRF - Do leadership candidates’ plans match the scale of the coming emergency in the cost of living?09/08/2022 16:15:00
The latest analysis carried out by the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) shows families needing £2550 to meet extra costs from the current crisis.
IFS - Significant regional inequality in the effectiveness of cardiologists treating heart attack patients in England09/08/2022 13:25:00
New IFS research published today shows that there was considerable regional inequality in the effectiveness of doctors treating heart attack patients in different parts of England between 2005 and 2018. This suggests that people living in some parts of the country have access to lower quality NHS healthcare.
IFS - School spending per pupil in 2024 to remain 3% below 2010 levels in real-terms once you account for actual costs faced by schools02/08/2022 15:20:00
Between 2009-10 and 2019-20, we estimate that school spending per pupil in England fell by 9% in real-terms. In the 2019 and 2021 Spending Review, the government allocated extra funding to schools and explicitly stated that this would restore spending per pupil to 2010 levels in real-terms by the end of the parliament in 2024-25. Unexpectedly high cost pressures on schools mean that the government is no longer on track to deliver on this objective.
“Junk science”: IEA expert rubbishes claim TfL ‘junk food’ ad ban prevented almost 100,000 obesity cases02/08/2022 14:20:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responds to a study published in the International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity claiming that Transport for London’s ban on ‘junk food’ advertising may have prevented 100,000 cases of obesity
IEA - Raise interest rates to 1.75 per cent immediately, votes Shadow Monetary Policy Committee02/08/2022 13:20:00
During the July 2022 Shadow MPC meeting, the key area of debate concerned the scale of the rise in Bank rate.
IFS - 110,000 workers missing from work as a result of long COVID at a cost of £1.5 billion a year in lost earnings27/07/2022 13:25:00
The number of people with long COVID (defined as reporting symptoms more than four weeks after infection) has been on the rise – with the latest ONS figures showing that there were almost 2 million people with the condition as of May 2022, around double the number a year before.
IPPR - Over £3 billion in unspent apprenticeship levy lost to Treasury ‘black hole’ new data reveal27/07/2022 12:25:00
Apprenticeships experts warn that the Treasury must be more transparent on how it spends the billions returned to its coffers
IEA - Save families £9,000 a year by cutting red tape in housing, childcare, and energy27/07/2022 11:25:00
The next Prime Minister should focus on radical supply-side reform over handouts to dramatically reduce the cost of living.