Bedford couple’s support withdrawal highlights special guardianship concerns
Special guardians deserve the right advice and support from councils before taking on the role, says the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
The findings come from an Ombudsman report in which Bedford Borough Council unfairly cut the financial support to a couple, after asking them to become special guardians to the children they were fostering.
The report echoes the calls the Ombudsman made earlier this year for councils to learn from the seven out of ten complaints it upholds about Special Guardianship Orders (SGO), to ensure children and their guardians are properly supported.
In this case, the council applied for an SGO for the couple without fully involving them in the process and not properly explaining it would review their financial support. This was despite the couple saying they didn’t want to accept the arrangements if it meant a reduction in their income as professional foster carers.
During the Ombudsman’s investigation, the council agreed to restore the support to the level the couple received as foster carers, and to backdate payments they had missed out on.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman yesterday said:
“Special guardians do a vital job in providing stability and security for some of our most vulnerable children who cannot live with their birth parents. While taking this on willingly, in return they deserve to have all the facts to understand the implications for their lives.
“In this case, Bedford Borough Council simply didn’t follow best practice in advising, involving and consulting with the couple. However, I welcome its acceptance of our findings and its offer to restore the family’s support.
“In addition, I have used our powers to recommend how the council should improve its procedures in the hope that other potential special guardians will not be placed in the same position.”
The couple who complained to the Ombudsman yesterday said:
“Having to go through this stress was a traumatic ordeal. So our hope is that other councils hear this story and learn from it.
“We feel without the Ombudsman’s help, we wouldn’t have got to where we are now, with the council accepting they got things wrong. We’re thankful we have got our issue resolved, and other special guardians should know that the Ombudsman is there if they have been treated in a similar way to us.”
The couple had fostered two young siblings for around 18 months before the council approached them to be special guardians, when it became apparent the children could not return to their mother. The couple made it clear the arrangement needed to be financially viable for them.
As part of the care proceedings, the council filed a support plan with the SGO, but it hadn’t been shared with the couple in advance so they could not agree to it.
The support plan said the couple would be expected to claim welfare benefits, and the value would be deducted from their current allowance rate. However, it did not say their overall allowance rate may be reduced in future or subject to a wider means test.
After the special guardian court order was agreed, the council reviewed the couple’s level of financial support. Eventually, after paying the allowance at the same level for over two years, the council reduced their payments by up to half for both children.
The couple told the council they were happy to be looking after the children and were pleased with how they were thriving. But they felt bullied into taking the SGO and were now struggling financially. They said they were led to believe they would continue to receive the same level of support they had as foster carers.
The Ombudsman’s investigation found the council at fault for a number of things including:
- not explaining the financial implications of changing status from foster carers to special guardians
- not consulting on versions of the support plan
- reducing allowances contrary to the support plan
- poorly explaining its decisions and keeping records
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has already offered to restore the financial support to foster carer allowance levels until the children reach 18, and repay missed support.
It has agreed to double the £250 it originally offered to recognise the couple’s distress and time and trouble complaining. It will also report back to the Ombudsman on how it will brief its staff on the correct procedures and legal requirements of special guardianship, particularly around making SGO support plans clear on the matter of financial support.
Special guardians are people who look after children who are not their own, following a court order. The Special Guardianship Order gives children more permanence than a regular fostering arrangement, and gives their guardians more rights to make decisions on their behalf. In practice, they are often a less costly option for councils than residential or foster care.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Ombudsman issues Armed Forces Covenant guidance to councils on Remembrance Day11/11/2019 16:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has issued new guidance for councils providing services for current and former armed forces personnel.
Somerset council took too long assessing disabled woman’s care needs01/11/2019 11:15:00
Somerset County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after taking too long to assess a vulnerable woman’s care needs.
Trust failed to inform man his cancer was terminal, Ombudsman finds30/10/2019 09:15:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has found serious failings at Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (the Trust) following the death of a man whose cancer was misdiagnosed, and who was not informed that his condition was terminal.
Blue badge applications to be reviewed in Sheffield25/10/2019 11:15:00
Sheffield City Council incorrectly assessed people for disabled blue badges, says an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Ombudsman welcomes Education Committee recommendations on Special Educational Needs23/10/2019 12:25:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has welcomed the Education Committee’s findings from its 18-month inquiry into reforms of the SEND system. These include a recommendation to extend the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction to give SEND families a single place to complain about the SEND system.
Ombudsman announces new Expert Advisory Panel22/10/2019 15:42:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman is pleased to announce the members of a newly formed Expert Advisory Panel.
Haringey and Islington councils criticised for how they recovered business rate debts17/10/2019 13:20:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised two London councils for the way they tried to recover historic business rate debts.
Bexley council failed to learn from previous school transport complaints11/10/2019 11:15:00
London Borough of Bexley has been heavily criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after it failed to make agreed improvements to the way it decides school transport applications for children with disabilities.