Bexley council failed to learn from previous school transport complaints
London Borough of Bexley has been heavily criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after it failed to make agreed improvements to the way it decides school transport applications for children with disabilities.
While the council implemented some of the changes, the Ombudsman still has concerns about the council’s understanding of the statutory guidance and its role and duties in deciding transport applications.
The Ombudsman has now issued a public report detailing the problems it has found which impacted the three families of children with disabilities.
Its report finds the council failed to consider not just whether the children could physically walk, but whether their autism, sensory issues, behaviour and fatigue meant they could walk the distance safely. It also continued to put the onus on parents to provide supporting evidence their children could not walk, rather than taking responsibility for collecting the professional evidence needed to reach a view.
The Ombudsman also found the council failed to understand the legal test needed to assess whether a child could walk to school, and instead made the decision based on whether the children could travel by car or public transport or enjoy community activities.
The Ombudsman also found the council at fault for only allowing the families to provide evidence at the appeal stage, rather than first consideration, and for how it calculated the financial remedy for the families.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“When a council agrees to our recommendations it should make every effort to comply. It is not acceptable for councils to agree to our recommendations just to close down a complaint.
“Not only has the council not been completely transparent with my office, it has also left three families frustrated and uncertain that their complaint and appeal was dealt with properly. This can only have eroded their trust in the authority’s capacity to get things right.
“I am pleased the council has now agreed to my further recommendations and, as with all investigations, we will keep in close contact with the council to get assurances these improvements are carried out.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has agreed to apologise to all three families for failing to follow our recommendations.
It has agreed to reconsider the applications of the families as new applications, where it has not already reversed its previous decision on appeal, and to obtain professional advice or carry out a face-to-face assessment, if required to decide an application.
It will also pay the families £250 each for the time and trouble of an additional unnecessary appeal and complaint, and for the time sourcing additional evidence which the council had agreed it would get.
It will refund the families’ out-of-pocket expenses for the period they were without transport and pay each family £10 for each school day they were without transport to acknowledge the time spent transporting their children, the stress and inconvenience, and the lost opportunity to work or undertake other activities.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council has agreed to review its training, policy and advice to officers and panel members. It will again review the staffing levels within the relevant department.
It will also provide training to all relevant staff on how the Ombudsman works, and the importance of complying with agreed recommendations. It has also agreed to consider whether officers and panel members would benefit from training on autism and other ‘hidden disabilities’.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Ombudsman issues Armed Forces Covenant guidance to councils on Remembrance Day11/11/2019 16:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has issued new guidance for councils providing services for current and former armed forces personnel.
Somerset council took too long assessing disabled woman’s care needs01/11/2019 11:15:00
Somerset County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after taking too long to assess a vulnerable woman’s care needs.
Trust failed to inform man his cancer was terminal, Ombudsman finds30/10/2019 09:15:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has found serious failings at Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (the Trust) following the death of a man whose cancer was misdiagnosed, and who was not informed that his condition was terminal.
Blue badge applications to be reviewed in Sheffield25/10/2019 11:15:00
Sheffield City Council incorrectly assessed people for disabled blue badges, says an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Ombudsman welcomes Education Committee recommendations on Special Educational Needs23/10/2019 12:25:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has welcomed the Education Committee’s findings from its 18-month inquiry into reforms of the SEND system. These include a recommendation to extend the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction to give SEND families a single place to complain about the SEND system.
Ombudsman announces new Expert Advisory Panel22/10/2019 15:42:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman is pleased to announce the members of a newly formed Expert Advisory Panel.
Haringey and Islington councils criticised for how they recovered business rate debts17/10/2019 13:20:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised two London councils for the way they tried to recover historic business rate debts.