Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Billion pound fund lacks political leadership and accountability
The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy publishes Stability and Security Fund report.
- Report: Conflict, Stability and Security Fund
- Report: Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (PDF)
- Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Objective, operation and achievements of Fund ‘opaque’.
The annual budget for the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund is worth more than £1 billion of taxpayers’ money. Launched in April 2015, it offers a more ambitious cross-government approach to tackling the causes and effects of conflict and instability in countries of strategic importance to the United Kingdom.
However, the Report says the objectives, operation and achievements of the Fund are 'opaque'.
The Committee hoped to examine the rationale, working and results of the Fund, which can be accessed by Government departments and agencies to commission projects intended to prevent conflict, stabilise countries or regions, and respond to international crises.
But Government failed to provide the Committee with sufficient evidence to judge whether the Fund was reaching its potential.
Without access to the National Security Council strategies for the Fund, information about the programmes and projects it has funded and a breakdown of expenditure, the Committee cannot provide parliamentary accountability for taxpayers’ money spent via the CSSF.
More transparency of fund needed
Chair of the Committee, Dame Margaret Beckett, commented:
"There is some evidence that the CSSF is doing a better job than its predecessor, the Conflict Pool. With multi-year programming, it is a flexible way of delivering support to fragile countries of strategic importance to the UK.
However, it is impossible for us to tell whether the Fund is meeting the Government’s goals or having the intended impact on the ground. This is because Government failed to provide sufficient evidence for the Committee to carry out any evaluation.
There is no central source of information to explain how the Fund works. There are no published criteria on which programmes and projects are funded. There are no published measures of the impact of CSSF-derived activity. And who has responsibility for the Fund’s management? No single minister is responsible – or accountable. The jury is still out.
This Fund has great potential. At the very least, Government must appoint a Cabinet Office minister to take responsibility for this £1 billion fund. If not, a lack of collective responsibility risks degenerating into no responsibility at all.
While we appreciate the need to maintain security, Government must bring forward plans to make the Fund more transparent. The publication of a detailed Annual Report for this financial year would begin to answer some of our questions."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Levelling up policy will fail without long-term substantive funding for councils, say MPs26/05/2023 15:20:00
The laudable aim to level up the country risks failure unless the Government can provide the long-term substantive funding necessary to help local councils to deliver economic growth for their communities, says the cross-party Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (LUHC) Committee in a report published today (Friday).
Implementation of Children’s social care strategy unambitious and slow, says Lord’s Committee25/05/2023 14:25:00
The Public Services Committee has published its new report, responding to the Government’s Strategy to reform children’s social care, 'Stable homes built on love: implementation strategy and consultation: Children’s Social Care Reform 2023'.
Applications open for schools to take part in the next youth engagement programme22/05/2023 15:25:00
The Environment and Climate Change Committee is offering secondary schools, sixth form colleges, and further education colleges the opportunity to work with the Committee by applying for its youth engagement programme for 14-18 year olds.
MPs express deep concern about gaps in rural mental health care18/05/2023 12:05:00
MPs express deep concern about how isolation, poor public transport and a relative lack of digital connectivity have contributed to poor mental health outcomes for all categories of people across rural communities in England, but especially among farm workers and vets.
Consumer cryptocurrency trading should be regulated as gambling, Treasury Committee says in new report17/05/2023 14:20:00
The Treasury Committee today calls for consumer trading in unbacked crypto to be regulated as gambling.
Sustainability of local journalism: CMS Committee publishes Government response17/05/2023 13:10:00
The Culture, Media and Sport Committee has today published the Government response to its report on the sustainability of local journalism.
MPs call for research sector reforms to address concerns with reproducibility of science10/05/2023 13:15:00
A new report by the Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Select Committee highlights concerns over the reproducibility of scientific research.
Government ambition on nuclear energy must be translated into action by pushing ahead with Wylfa nuclear power station, MPs argue03/05/2023 14:20:00
Concrete commitment by ministers on the future of nuclear energy, and in particular at Wylfa in North Wales, is lacking despite positive policy signals, the Welsh Affairs Committee argues today.