Information Commissioner's Office
Blog: Reflecting on the first year of the ‘Explaining decisions made with AI’ guidance
Abigail Hackston, ICO Senior Policy Officer – Innovation looks back on the ICO’s work with organisations who use personal data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support, or to make decisions about individuals.
It is estimated that AI has the potential to help UK GDP grow by between 10 and 22 per cent by 2030. But with AI so often relying on people’s personal data to fuel innovation, those benefits are only possible where people trust their information will be used fairly.
To help organisations achieve this, the ICO worked with The Alan Turing Institute to produce our ‘Explaining decisions made with AI’ guidance, published in May 2020. This aimed to “develop a framework for explaining processes, services and decisions delivered by AI, to improve transparency and accountability.”
The guidance was produced as a best practice document to help organisations of various sizes from different sectors.
We were clear from the outset that we wanted to make this guidance as practical and useful as possible. This reflects a key ICO aim to enable innovation and economic growth in the AI sector. We can only do this if the guidance we produce is practically applicable to real life situations.
To understand the impact that the guidance has had, during the last year, we consulted with 56 organisations who make decisions about their customers using personal data and AI. This group included SMEs, public sector organisations and established technology organisations.
We asked these groups to tell us what worked well, what could be improved, and whether they had any further comments on the guidance.
The feedback was positive, and we are pleased that participants found the guidance useful and of high quality. We heard that the guidance provides a good foundation for improving awareness and understanding of the need for explanations relating to AI systems, and how to construct those explanations.
Respondents also said the guidance clearly defined the key elements needed to build explainable AI systems and when further detail was needed this was also easy to understand.
Areas the consultation identified to improve on included the length of the guidance. To address this point and ensure the key parts of the guidance are quickly accessible, we have added the “at a glance” sections separately alongside the guidance as a summary document. This pulls the fundamental elements of the guidance into one place and makes it easier to find them quickly.
There were concerns raised that some parts of the guidance were not particularly useful for SMEs. It was felt that the level of detail given was more suited to larger organisations, and some additional support may be needed for organisations that do not have the technical capabilities to build and support an AI system in-house. If you run an SME that processes personal data using AI, remember that you can get additional support from the ICO’s SME web hub.
We will add some case studies to the guidance, so that organisations can reference some practical examples of good practice in action. Our consultees indicated that this would be a valuable addition. If you feel you have an example of a good case study we might use, we would love to hear from you. Please get in contact with us via AI@ico.org.uk.
We are pleased that the feedback we received indicates that the guidance is having a material impact among the organisations who participated in this consultation. These comments give the ICO confidence that the guidance will be an effective tool for those who choose to use it.
The ICO will take the research findings into account in our future work on AI and in our production of further guidance on this and other related topics.
Abigail Hackston is a Senior Policy Officer for Innovation at the ICO.
Latest News from
Information Commissioner's Office
ICO fines facial recognition database company Clearview AI Inc more than £7.5m and orders UK data to be deleted24/05/2022 09:10:00
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has fined Clearview AI Inc £7,552,800 for using images of people in the UK, and elsewhere, that were collected from the web and social media to create a global online database that could be used for facial recognition.
Director’s Update: Doing more with less – working with the FOI community to improve future FOI regulation23/05/2022 12:25:00
This is the second in a series of updates from Warren Seddon, Director of FOI and Transparency.
Blog: What does equality of access really mean when developing a career with a visual impairment?19/05/2022 12:25:00
On Global Accessibility Awareness Day, Paul Arnold, ICO Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer shares his story.
Blog: A day in the life of the ICO’s information management team13/05/2022 12:25:00
“It’s important to remember the people behind the information.”
ICO response to Channel 4 ‘Inside the Metaverse’ documentary29/04/2022 12:25:00
A recent C4 Dispatches – Inside the Metaverse looked at the metaverse and how the platforms enforce against users that act inappropriately.
Conclusion of ICO investigation into unauthorised disclosure of CCTV footage from DHSC – 19 April 202220/04/2022 12:25:00
The ICO found insufficient evidence to prosecute two people suspected of unlawfully obtaining and disclosing CCTV footage from the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC).
Statement following conclusion of ICO investigation into unauthorised disclosure of CCTV footage from DHSC13/04/2022 16:20:00
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has found insufficient evidence to prosecute two people suspected of unlawfully obtaining and disclosing CCTV footage from the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC).
Children's privacy and international collaboration12/04/2022 15:20:00
John Edwards, UK Information Commissioner, is in Washington DC this week to meet with regulators, civil society, lawmakers and tech companies, as well as present the work of the ICO at the IAPP Global Privacy Summit.