Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Brexit: negotiating priorities for justice system
The Government must address four priorities for the justice system in negotiating the UK's new relationship with the UK, says the Justice Committee.
- Read the report summary
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: Implications of Brexit for the justice system
The report recommends that the Government should:
- Continue co-operating on criminal justice as closely as possible
- Maintain access to the EU's valuable regulations in inter-state commercial law
- Enable cross-border legal practice rights and opportunities
- Retain efficient mechanisms to resolve family law cases involving EU Member States and the UK
Crime is ever more international. EU mechanisms to combat illegal activities across borders include:
- the European Arrest Warrant, accelerating the extradition of those suspected or convicted of offences elsewhere
- investigative resources in Europol and Eurojust, supporting police, prosecutors and judges
- information-sharing tools, giving rapid access to suspects’ criminal records and biometric information.
Committee Chair Bob Neill MP said:
"We welcome the Government’s signals that it intends to continue to cooperate with the EU on criminal justice. The seriousness of the matter and the degree of mutual interest give weight to the suggestion that this aspect of negotiations be separated firmly from others—it is too precious to be left vulnerable to tactical bargaining."
In civil justice, EU regulations establish procedures on choice of jurisdiction, and mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, for transnational disputes.
The report recommends that the Government should aim to replicate the provisions of Brussels I Recast as closely as possible, perhaps using the EU-Denmark agreement as a blueprint. As a minimum, it must endeavour to secure membership of Lugano II and the 2005 Hague Convention in its own right. Rome I and II should be brought into domestic law. The Government must also address the potential liabilities for non-performance of contractual duties that financial institutions may face as a consequence of Brexit.
The Committee recognises that Brussels IIa and the Maintenance Regulation are not without fault: races to issue resulting from Brussels IIa's divorce provisions are particularly undesirable. However, they are improvements over their default alternatives, and mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments in family cases is of demonstrable value in resolving cross-border instances of child abduction and non-payment of maintenance.
The report recommends that the Government should seek to maintain the closest possible cooperation with the EU on family justice matters, and in particular to retain a system for mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments.
The Court of Justice of the EU
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is the ultimate interpreter of EU law. The Government has in recent months repeatedly stated its intention to end its jurisdiction in the UK. However, the report concludes that it remains unclear how civil justice co-operation will work without the CJEU or another court playing a limited arbitral role.
Bob Neill MP said:
"Protecting the UK as a top-class commercial law centre should be a major priority given the clear impacts on the economy of failure to do so: the Government should look to replicate existing provisions as closely as possible.
Similar provisions in family law provide greater speed in child abduction cases, for example, and represent improvements over their default alternatives.
We believe that a role for the Court of Justice of the European Union in respect of these essentially procedural regulations is a price worth paying to maintain effective cross-border tools of justice."
Cross-border legal practice rights and opportunities
The Committee recognises that the legal services sector underpins many areas of UK economic activity; the report concludes that its ability to continue to facilitate these in the EU will diminish without protection of existing practising rights there for UK lawyers, and that there is also clear evidence of reciprocal benefit. The report recommends that the Government include achieving this protection in its Brexit negotiating strategy.
The Committee believes that overall the implications of Brexit for the legal services sector give cause for concern, but not hyperbole: most of the sector's strengths are unabated, and sensible discussions between the UK and EU ought to protect many of the advantages of their existing cooperation. However, the report recommends that the Government should consider and promote the legal services sector in the context of its expected post-Brexit trade recalibration and the pursuit of new deals; it should outline steps it will take to protect and provide opportunities for the sector.
Bob Neill MP said:
"The UK's legal services sector makes a £25.7 billion annual economic contribution. It relies on openness, and its lawyers' current rights to practice across EU Member States help small businesses and ordinary people as well as large firms and wealthy individuals.
We recommend that the Government protect these powers. It should also outline steps it will take to provide opportunities for the sector more broadly—with concerted efforts by EU law firms to use Brexit to win clients from UK competitors—though we have faith in UK legal services’ fundamental strengths."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government response to Business Committee Industrial Policy report published27/09/2021 13:43:00
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee recently (24 September 2021) published the Government’s response [include link] to the BEIS Committee’s Industrial Policy report (which was published on 28th June 2021).
Government must learn lessons from the use of criminal law in the covid-19 pandemic24/09/2021 15:33:00
The Justice Committee has called on the Government to learn lessons from its use of the criminal law in the covid-19 pandemic.
Treasury Committee publishes responses to Greensill report24/09/2021 13:33:00
The Treasury Committee today publishes the responses from the Government, FCA and Bank of England to its report on Lessons from Greensill Capital.
Government’s focus on Levelling Up must not turn back the clock on hard-won equal rights24/09/2021 11:38:00
In its new Report, Levelling Up and equality: a new framework for change, the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee continues to argue that the Government must create a new Cabinet level Secretary of State for Equalities and Levelling Up.
Senior parliamentarians criticise failures in government security planning20/09/2021 09:20:00
A Parliamentary committee concerned with national security strategy says there are serious weaknesses in the workings of UK Government structures that deal with national security, as exemplified by both the covid-19 pandemic and recent events in Afghanistan.
Reforms required if Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties is to be effective, report finds17/09/2021 13:15:00
The International Agreements Committee has today published a new report on Working Practices. It reflects on our experience of parliamentary treaty scrutiny and proposes further reforms to make scrutiny more effective.
Scottish renewables progress hampered by grid connection charges17/09/2021 11:05:00
The Scottish Affairs Committee calls for transmission charges and grid investment to be equally shared across the UK to help strengthen the Scottish renewables sector.
European Statutory Instruments Committee publishes fourth report16/09/2021 15:05:00
Following the Committee's meeting on Tuesday 14 September, its fourth report of Session 2021-22 has been published.