Criminal Cases Review Commission
CCRC Chairman Helen Pitcher’s letter to The Times re: “Ministers bullied justice watchdog” article
This letter was submitted to The Times on July 30 in relation to an article that appeared the day before. It was not published so we have made it available here.
I take issue with your article “Ministers bullied justice watchdog, lawyers claim” (Times 29 July). The CCRC has never had any problem standing up for itself with the Ministry of Justice or with anyone else for that matter.
We are a public body spending taxpayers’ money and it must be right that the way we spend that money is subject to scrutiny on behalf of the public. To perceive that as bullying and muddle it with the independence of our casework decision making is misguided at best.
As a responsible public body we must be careful not to pre-empt the ongoing judicial review of the Ministry of Justice mentioned in your article and where the claimant essentially says the CCRC is not sufficiently independent to decide his case because of recent Ministry input in relation to the pay and conditions of our Commissioners.
In spite of that, I think we can safely point out that the CCRC independence that really matters is the independence of our casework decisions. That is not a function of the terms and conditions of our contracts of employment, but of the attitude of the organisation as a whole and of the individual Commissioners who make those decisions. Their excellent credentials are there for all to see on the About Us section of the CCRC website. They and we absolutely reject any suggestions that CCRC decisions are driven by anything but the merit of individual cases. To say otherwise is to be wrong.
Helen Pitcher OBE, Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, St Philip’s Place, Birmingham, B3 2PW.
Latest News from
Criminal Cases Review Commission
CCRC to refer 39 Post Office cases on abuse of process argument26/03/2020 11:20:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has so far decided to refer for appeal the convictions of 39 Post Office applicants.
Commission refers the convictions of eight members of the Shrewsbury 2405/03/2020 15:38:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred for appeal the convictions of eight members of the Shrewsbury 24.
Commission refers the conviction of E to the Crown Court20/02/2020 14:38:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the conviction of E to the Crown Court.
Commission refers the case of D for appeal14/02/2020 14:15:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the case of D for appeal.
Commission refers the life sentence in the attempted murder of case of C, a minor29/01/2020 16:38:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred for appeal the life sentence for attempted murder imposed on Mr C when he was 16 years old.
Commission refers the public order conviction of James Robson29/01/2020 09:10:00
The CCRC has referred for appeal the 2017 public order conviction of James Robson.
Commission refers the conviction of human trafficking victim T to the appeal court27/01/2020 10:15:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred for appeal the cannabis production conviction of a Vietnamese woman who was trafficked into the UK and twice trafficked within it.
The CCRC refers for appeal the conviction of the fourth and final member of the Oval Four14/01/2020 08:10:00
The CCRC has referred the 1972 theft and police assault conviction of Omar Boucher to the Court of Appeal on the basis of police misconduct.
Commission refers the human trafficking case of Ms A to the Crown Court10/12/2019 13:10:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the conviction of Ms A to the Crown Court in light of a change in law and fresh evidence that she is a victim of human trafficking both into and within the UK, and that it was not in the public interest to prosecute her.