CJEU clarifies the scope of consumer protection in the case of a charge on the family home
The Court clarifies the scope of consumer protection in the case of a charge on the family home
Since the right to accommodation is a fundamental right, it must be taken into consideration by the
national court when implementing the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive
The purpose of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive is to approximate the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to unfair terms in contracts concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer. 1
In 2009, Mrs Kušionová concluded a consumer credit agreement with SMART Capital for an amount of €10 000. The loan was secured by a charge on the family home. Subsequently, Mrs Kušionová brought an action for annulment of the credit agreement and the charge agreement against SMART Capital, claiming that the contractual terms binding her to that undertaking were unfair.
In that context, the Krajský súd v Prešove (Regional Court, Prešov, Slovakia), before which an appeal was brought, referred a question to the Court of Justice. The referring court seeks to establish whether the contractual term relating to extrajudicial enforcement of the charge on immovable property is unfair. In addition,the national court states that that term enables the creditor to enforce the charge without any review being carried out by a court.
First of all, the Court notes that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides that EU policies must ensure a high level of consumer protection. The Charter also enshrines the right to an effective judicial remedy. Those mandatory requirements are applicable to the implementation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive.
With regard to the enforcement of guarantees attached to loan agreements concluded by consumers, the Court notes that the Directive is silent as to enforcement of charges. However, it points out the importance of determining, in a situation such as that at issue, to what extent it would be impossible in practice or excessively difficult to apply the protection conferred by that directive.
In this case, it is clear from the documents before the Court that the Slovak legislation at issue provides, first, that a sale by auction may be contested within 30 days of the notice of enforcement of the charge and, secondly, that the person who contests the conditions under which that sale took place has a period of three months following the public auction to take steps.
The Court also notes that, in order to protect the rights conferred on consumers by the Directive, the Member States are bound to adopt protective measures in order prevent the continued application of terms which are deemed unfair. For that purpose, the national courts andadministrative authorities must have at their disposal adequate and effective means. In particular,while the choice of penalties applicable to infringements of EU law remains within their discretion, Member States must ensure in particular that they are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
With regard to the requirement that the penalty should be effective and dissuasive, it is evident that, during a procedure for the extrajudicial enforcement of a charge, the national court with jurisdiction may adopt any interim measure to prevent such a sale from going ahead.
With regard to the proportionality of the penalty, the Court notes that it is necessary to give particular attention to the fact that the property subject to the charge is immovable property forming the consumer’s family home. Under EU law, the right to accommodation is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights which the national court must take into consideration when implementing the Directive.
In the present case, the Court holds that the fact that it is possible for the competent national court to adopt any interim measure would suggest that adequate and effective means exist to prevent the continued use of unfair terms, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.
NOTE: A reference for a preliminary ruling allows the courts and tribunals of the Member States, in disputes which have been brought before them, to refer questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union act. The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. It is for the national court or tribunal to dispose of the case in accordance with the Court’s decision, which is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised.
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).www.curia.europa.eu
Latest News from
ESMA Publishes Annual Peer Review of EU CCP Supervision09/04/2021 11:10:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, yesterday published its annual peer review report on the supervision of EU Central Counterparties (CCPs) by National Competent Authorities (NCAs).
ESMA Report Highlights Liquidity Concerns For Alternative Investment Funds08/04/2021 15:20:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU securities regulator, today publishes its third annual statistical report on the Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) sector.
ESMA Publishes Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Changes to CCPS’ Activities And Models08/04/2021 13:25:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority, the EU’s securities markets regulator, today published its Final Report containing draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) relating to changes to central counterparty (CCP) services and activities, as well as models and parameters under the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).
Joint Statement by Commissioner Reynders and Yoon Jong In, Chairperson of the Personal Information Protection Commission of the Republic of Korea30/03/2021 15:25:00
In their call today, Commissioner for Justice Didier Reynders and Chairperson of the Personal Information Protection Commission Yoon Jong In welcomed the successful conclusion of the adequacy talks between the European Union and the Republic of Korea.
Speech by President von der Leyen at the High-level meeting on the international debt architecture and liquidity30/03/2021 13:25:00
Speech given yesterday by President von der Leyen at the High-level meeting on the international debt architecture and liquidity.
EU values explained in one minute30/03/2021 10:38:00
What are the six core values the European Union is based upon and how do they translate into our daily lives?
COVID-19: EU helps to deliver vaccines to Moldova and medical items to Montenegro and North Macedonia30/03/2021 09:25:00
The EU is supporting Romania in delivering 50,400 doses of vaccines to Moldova in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Speech by Commissioner Reynders at American Chamber of Commerce on the Digital Transatlantic Economy29/03/2021 16:33:00
Speech given recently (26 March 2021) by Commissioner Reynders at American Chamber of Commerce on the Digital Transatlantic Economy.