CJEU rules on UK appeal against draft plans for FTT
The Court has dismissed the action brought by the United Kingdom against the decision authorising eleven Member States to establish enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax.
arguments relied on by the United Kingdom are directed at the elements of a
future tax and not at the authorisation to establish enhanced
cooperation In this case, the United Kingdom has asked the Court of
Justice to annul a Council decision1
authorising eleven Member States2 to use the enhanced cooperation procedure to set up a financial transaction tax (‘FTT’).
That decision was adopted when, after three Council meetings in June and July 2012 where a Commission 2011 proposal for a directive was discussed, it became obvious that an FTT could not obtain unanimous support within the Council in the foreseeable future.
In February 2013, after the adoption of the decision authorising enhanced cooperation, the Commission adopted a further proposal for a directive.
The United Kingdom considers that the contested decision authorises the adoption of an FTT which produces extraterritorial effects. It further maintains that, read together with other directives3 on mutual assistance and administrative cooperation in the area of tax, the FTT will impose costs on non-participating Member States. The United Kingdom accepts that its action might be regarded as premature and that, rather than challenging the authorisation decision, it should contest, at the appropriate time, the implementing measure which will ultimately be adopted by the participating States. Nonetheless, it decided to bring, as a precaution, an action for the annulment of the authorisation decision in order to preserve its right to challenge such an implementing measure.
By its judgment , the Court dismisses the United Kingdom’s action.
The Court states that, in the context of an action for the annulment of a decision which authorises enhanced cooperation, the Court’s review is related to the issue of whether the granting of such authorisation is valid. That review must not be confused with the review which may be undertaken, in the context of a subsequent action for annulment, of a measure adopted for the purposes of the implementation of the authorised enhanced cooperation.
In this case, the Court finds that the contested decision does no more than authorise the establishment of enhanced cooperation, but does not contain any substantive element on the FTT itself. The elements of a future FTT challenged by the United Kingdom are in no way constituent elements of the contested decision. They are solely contained, at this stage, in the Commission’s proposals of 2011 and 2013.
Council Decision 2013/52/EU of 22 January 2013 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (OJ 2013 L 22, p. 11).
Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia.
Council Directive 2010/24/EU of 16 March 2010 concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures (OJ 2010 L 84, p. 1) and Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC
(OJ 2011 L 64, p. 1). www.curia.europa.eu
Likewise, the contested decision contains no provision on the issue of expenditure linked to the implementation of enhanced cooperation. That issue can therefore not be examined before the introduction of the FTT.
That being the case, the Court considers that the two
arguments put forward by the United Kingdom are directed at elements of a
potential FTT and not at the authorisation to establish enhanced
cooperation, and consequently those arguments must be rejected and the action
must fttbe dismissed.
NOTE: An action for annulment seeks the annulment of acts of the institutions of the European Union that are contrary to European Union law. The Member States, the European institutions and individuals may, under certain conditions, bring an action for annulment before the Court of Justice or the General Court. If the action is well founded, the act is annulled. The institution concerned must fill any legal vacuum created by the annulment of the act.
Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the Court of Justice.
The full text of the judgment is published on the CURIA website on the day of delivery.
Press contact: Christopher Fretwell (+352) 4303 3355
Pictures of the delivery of the judgment are available from "Europe by Satellite" (+32) 2 2964106
Latest News from
Genocide and war crimes cases rise by 1/3 in the EU in 3 years24/05/2019 11:25:00
EU Member States are giving more priority to investigating genocide and war crimes. The number of new cases rose by a third over the last three years, with 1,430 new investigations launched in 2018.
Technical standards on the reporting of intra-group transactions & risk concentration for Financial Conglomerates24/05/2019 10:33:00
The 3 European Supervisory Authorities, the EBA, the ESMA and the EIOPA have launched a consultation on draft Implementing Technical Standards (ITSs) on the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration for Financial Conglomerates.
General Data Protection Regulation: one year on23/05/2019 16:37:00
On 25 May 2019, the General Data Protection Regulation will celebrate its first year of entry into application. To mark the occasion, Andrus Ansip, Vice-President for the Digital Single Market and Věra Jourová, Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, issued a statement.
Fairness in the food supply chain: EC proposes to increase price transparency23/05/2019 15:25:00
Having banned unfair trading practices and improved producer cooperation, the EC is presenting the third element to improve fairness in the food supply chain by introducing greater transparency in the way prices are reported throughout the chain.
How to measure the condition of Europe's ecosystems?23/05/2019 14:37:00
The European Environment Agency’s (EEA) new analysis looks at how to measure the condition of Europe’s natural capital and provides a first overview of the state & trends of Europe’s ecosystems. The report also highlights the need for better data on the condition of ecosystems in Europe.
Young people and the future of work: Council conclusions23/05/2019 13:25:00
The Council has adopted conclusions on young people and the future of work. The conclusions highlight insecurity, the lack of social protection and precarious working conditions as the main problems facing young people in the current and future labour environment.
Roll-out date for safer, more aerodynamic lorry cabs confirmed by Council23/05/2019 12:37:00
Lorries with rounder cabin noses are set to make their way onto European roads from 1 September 2020, as the Council today signed off on the earlier introduction of the safer and greener design.
Council adopts remaining files on electricity market & Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators23/05/2019 12:07:00
The EU has completed the overhaul of its energy policy framework, which provides the regulatory preconditions for the transition to clean energy and sets the EU on the path towards achieving its Paris Agreement commitments.
EC welcomes Council final adoption of new rules on single-use plastics to reduce marine plastic litter22/05/2019 16:37:00
The Council of the EU has adopted the ambitious measures proposed by the EC to tackle marine litter coming from the 10 single-use plastic products most often found on European beaches, as well as abandoned fishing gear and oxo-degradable plastics.