Competition & Markets Authority
CMA clears PayPal / iZettle deal
The CMA has cleared PayPal’s completed takeover of rival mobile payments company iZettle after an in-depth, Phase 2, investigation.
Both companies provide mobile point of sale (mPOS) devices that enable businesses to take ‘offline’ payments through a card reader connected to a smartphone or tablet. The 2 companies are also active in the emerging market for ‘omni-channel’ payment services, through which businesses can take ‘offline’ and ‘online’ payments through a single provider.
An initial, Phase 1, investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) had raised concerns that PayPal’s purchase of its rival might reduce competition in the supply of mPOS devices in the UK. This led to the deal being referred for a comprehensive, Phase 2, probe. The CMA then announced in April that it had provisionally found the deal should be cleared. Having consulted on this provisional finding, the CMA has now confirmed the merger has been cleared.
The payments services sector is dynamic and evolving. The CMA’s investigation, led by an independent group of panel members, considered in detail how competition between the merging businesses would have been likely to develop in future. It reviewed extensive evidence relating to PayPal’s rationale for the merger and what the commercial strategies of PayPal and iZettle would have been if the merger had not taken place. It also considered how customers choose between the more novel mPOS devices, and ‘traditional’ point of sale devices.
This revealed that, while iZettle and PayPal are 2 of the largest suppliers of mPOS devices, their customers are also willing to switch to ‘traditional’ POS devices. The 2 largest suppliers of payment services to smaller merchants, Worldpay and Barclaycard, account for almost 60% of the market at present and will continue to constrain the merged company.
The merged company will also face significant competition from other mPOS-only players, such as Square and SumUp, which have both grown significantly in recent years.
In omni-channel services, the CMA found that iZettle would only have been able to develop its offering slowly and would have remained a marginal player for the foreseeable future. The CMA also found that other significant competitors would be more important constraints on PayPal.
Further details, including the full text of the Final Report, are available on the PayPal/iZettle case page.
Latest News from
Competition & Markets Authority
Facebook and eBay pledge to combat trading in fake reviews09/01/2020 09:20:00
Following action from the CMA, Facebook and eBay have committed to combatting the trade of fake and misleading reviews on their sites.
Illumina/PacBio abandon merger03/01/2020 10:20:00
Illumina has abandoned its anticipated $1.2 billion takeover of PacBio after an in-depth CMA merger probe highlighted serious competition concerns.
LN-Gaiety’s purchase of MCD cleared by CMA20/12/2019 12:20:00
An in-depth CMA investigation has found that Live Nation-Gaiety’s proposed purchase of MCD does not raise competition concerns.
CMA lifts the lid on digital giants18/12/2019 13:20:00
The CMA has published an update in its examination of online platforms and digital advertising, uncovering new detail about how the sector’s biggest names operate.
Estate agents fined over half a million pounds for price fixing18/12/2019 09:10:00
3 Berkshire estate agents have been fined more than £600,000 for illegally fixing the minimum commission rates they charged their customers.
Pharmaceutical merger cleared by CMA16/12/2019 11:25:00
The CMA has cleared the anticipated purchase of gene therapy company Spark Therapeutics by pharmaceutical company Roche Holdings.
Amazon’s Deliveroo investment raises competition concerns12/12/2019 11:20:00
Amazon’s investment in Deliveroo raises serious competition concerns for UK customers that may require an in-depth investigation by the CMA.
CMA Statement on design, construction and fit-out services director disqualification11/12/2019 12:20:00
Individual directors should be held accountable if their company breaks competition law.