|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
CSJ - School selection can help our poorest now.
If you want to know how well a child will do at school, look at their parents' bank statement.
It's a brutal, cynical way to view the world but in this country, in 2017, it is the surest indicator of attainment.
The factors at play are of course far more complicated than money alone. But by almost any measure, the more disadvantaged your background, the worse the school you will attend, and the worse your outcomes will be.
This cannot be left to stand.
The political answer to this that has received most attention is grammar schools. They are by no means a silver bullet - they are a small part of a much bigger system - but the CSJ is pleased to see some action being taken to re-energise social mobility through education.
We have spoken out in favour of this policy even though it is not widely popular.
We accept the criticism that grammar schools have not historically served the most disadvantaged but that is why some schools now set quotas, a measure we would like to see spread, and one the Government is encouraging.
We also accept that what's right for Kent is not right for Carlisle. It is why we have advocated locally based solutions and why we're pleased to see the Government is touting opportunity areas and increasing local control.
But one thing we do not accept is the blanket refusal of so many to think innovatively in this area of policy.
The CSJ's education unit is considering long term, large scale reform around pupil referral units, early years, technical education, and life skills. These are hugely important for the future of our system.
But in the meantime, some basic changes to the ideas around selection could turn around thousands of young lives now, this year.
Our point is a simple one. Far too much airtime is being given in political circles to how much money everyone should get, be it schools, hospitals, job centres, or anything else.
What our poorest need is not 1% here or a bung there but genuinely innovative and brave thinking, so that the next generation of children will not be able to predict their GCSE results from a glance at their parents' bank account.
Well implemented selective policies can play their part in that.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - Unionising Deliveroo riders will hurt them and the wider economy25/05/2017 11:35:00
Sam Bowman, Executive Director of the Adam Smith Institute, responded to the International Workers Union of Great Britain's attempt to force Deliveroo to accept it as a union for its riders
Adam Smith Inst - Undermining encryption will make us less safe and do nothing to stop ISIS25/05/2017 09:35:00
Sam Dumitriu, Research Economist of the Adam Smith Institute, esponded following The Sun’s report that ministers are planning to force tech companies like Facebook and Apple to introduce backdoors for encrypted messaging services
Kings Fund - Adoption charity named overall winner of the 2017 GSK IMPACT Awards23/05/2017 16:35:00
A charity supporting children and families affected by adoption has been named overall winner of the 2017 GSK IMPACT Awards.
Demos’ response to digital prosperity and security pledges in the Conservative Party Manifesto23/05/2017 15:35:00
The Conservative manifesto contains a whole section on digital prosperity and security – an interesting proposal, with ideas ranging from the much-needed to the ominously vague. As ever, the key here will be how these thoughts are translated into regulation.