Cebr: Latest Scottish Government Deficit Assessment
Independent Scottish Government would start with a deficit of at least 6.4%
It is conventional wisdom that if Scotland is independent there will be a need for fiscal austerity, claimed by the CBI, the IFS and various City analysts including most recently Societé Generale.. But new figures recently available make it clear that the problem is even worse than had been thought.
First, Scotland’s share of UK public spending now appears to have been 9.6% in 2012/13 according to new data released by the ONS at the end of July in Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses, whereas its share of the UK’s on-shore economy was only 8.0%. Assuming taxes roughly proportional to shares of GVA, this would imply a non oil deficit of 1.6% of UK GVA, which may not seem much but amounts to 20.6% of Scottish on shore GVA.
Second, although this deficit has traditionally been partly covered by oil revenues, these revenues have collapsed. Scotland’s share of oil revenues in 2008 amounted to nearly 8% of Scottish on shore GVA which would have left the overall deficit for Scotland as a share of GDP much in line with the rest of the UK. But UK oil revenues fell from £12.42 billion in 2008 to £4.7 billion in 2013. They should rise slightly over the coming years to £6.4 billion in 2016/17 but are unlikely to rise dramatically unless the sterling price of oil jumps sharply. So the oil revenues in the future will do rather less to close the gap than has occurred previously.
We now estimate using the new data that for 2013/14 the total Scottish deficit as a % of GDP (we have constructed a new series for Scottish GDP that includes off shore activity and scales up the GVA data) was 9.9% compared with a UK deficit of 5.7%.
Looking out to 2016/17 which would be the first full year in which Scotland might be independent, austerity measures already in place and some rise in oil revenues should bring down this deficit to 6.4% of Scotland’s GDP (with the UK deficit at 2.2%). This compares with the IFS estimate in June of 5.5% of GDP for Scotland for the same year, which was close to the 5.8% which we estimated before the new data became available.
All this of course assumes that the Scottish tax base is sustained in the independence scenario. But with uncertainty hindering investment, Scotland has been growing more slowly than England in recent years. And it is clear that part of the financial service sector would have to leave Scotland if it were independent. And of course there are also startup costs for an independent country which Cebr estimates at a total bill of £2.4 billion though this would be phased over a number of years. So the probability is that the fiscal pressures on the new government of an independent Scotland would be substantial. Our maths suggest that the new government would have to issue around £9 billion of new bonds which would certainly have to be sold at a substantial interest rate premium by the new government if indeed they could be sold at all, which could be problematic given the negativity towards independence in financial markets.
It is deeply ironic that Scotland might even start its independence already in the hands of the IMF!
And yet these calculations could cut both ways in the independence debate. Devo-max and fiscal independence, which is the most likely consequence of a No vote, would mean that these fiscal issues would still have to be addressed, though without the complication of reduced financial service revenues and probably over a longer timescale. Arguably achieving popular consent to austerity measures would be easier if Scotland were independent than it might be if there was uncertainty about the extent to which the problems could be blamed on the English and the London government.
Either way, the next 5 years at least look set to be some of the toughest years economically that Scotland has faced since between the wars.
Latest News from
Civitas - Anti-racism industry creating a dependency upon race experts in which ‘racial divisions are becoming ever more firmly entrenched’, says think-tank report08/04/2021 10:35:00
The anti-racism industry ‘creates a dependency’ upon a race discourse that sows division, finds a new Civitas report. ‘The tragic consequence’, the report finds, ‘is that racial divisions are becoming ever more firmly entrenched’.
The King’s Fund response to The Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities report02/04/2021 09:10:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, commented on the report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities
UK economy will likely bounce back “more strongly than many expect,” says IEA expert01/04/2021 14:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the latest GDP data from the Office for National Statistics
Civitas - ‘Nurturing Britain’s high-tech capabilities’ and ‘safeguarding critical industries’ should be central to managing potential risks of economic dependence on China, think-tank report finds01/04/2021 13:35:00
‘British policymakers should think carefully about the degree of economic reliance on China that it is wise to tolerate where critical infrastructure is concerned’, a new think-tank paper suggests.
Commit to new deal for healthcare workers or risk ‘deadly exodus’, IPPR warns government01/04/2021 12:35:00
As many as one in four healthcare workers – equivalent to 330,000 staff - say they are more likely to leave the NHS due to a year of unprecedented pressure, according to new polling by IPPR/YouGov. The figure - which includes the equivalent of 100,000 nurses and 8,000 midwives – adds pressure to a workforce that was experiencing a crisis of unfilled vacancies even before the pandemic.
UK right to call for WTO reform, says IEA expert01/04/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that Britain it to use its G7 presidency to press for reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
IFS - Scottish Government funding per person is over 30% higher than equivalent English funding. But it has still chosen to use temporary COVID funding to pay for some new permanent spending commitments.01/04/2021 10:35:00
Real-terms funding for the Scottish Government’s day-to-day (or resource) spending in 2021-22 is still set to be 2% lower per person than in 2010-11, after excluding temporary COVID-19 related funding, and adjusting for new responsibilities.
Financial Ombudsman Service needs “major reform,” says new research01/04/2021 09:35:00
A new report from the Institute of Economic Affairs, written by IEA Head of Regulatory Affairs Victoria Hewson, draws attention to the shortcomings of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).