Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Churn and political interference hampering major project delivery, says PACAC report
Political pressures and staff turnover can significantly impact the Government’s ability to successfully deliver major infrastructure projects, finds an interim report published
Effective project design and delivery is vital for taxpayer returns
Government annual spending on high-profile construction and defence infrastructure projects runs into the billions of pounds, and although these are often projected to provide considerable taxpayer returns in the future, effective project design and delivery is vital if these forecasts are to be realised.
In an interim report published ahead of the dissolution of Parliament, PACAC outlines key themes raised so far during its inquiry and recommends that a successor Committee continues investigating these issues in the future.
Chair of the Committee, Sir Bernard Jenkin MP said:
“The purpose of major infrastructure projects should be to deliver benefits to the public, and our Civil Service is rightly charged with ensuring these are delivered as originally advertised. However, our inquiry to date has raised familiar concerns: capability, churn, conflicts of interest, and perhaps most concerningly, individual political imperatives overriding proper scrutiny of business cases.
“With Government’s Major Projects Portfolio currently overseeing 133 projects with a value of £423 billion, addressing these issues to the benefit of all taxpayers should be high on the list of priorities for any future Government.”
Central Government oversight
The report highlights a trend of increasing oversight from the centre of Government, although individual departments remain responsible for major project delivery. It recommends further examination of the relationship between the Infrastructure Projects Authority and individual departments, and how it can best develop capability through its leadership of the cross-government Project Leadership Function.
Civil Service capability and skills
This has been an issue long highlighted by PACAC inquiries, and the report welcomes investment in developing the skills base necessary for the delivery of major projects. It also highlights the need for long-term assessment of whether this investment has yielded better delivery.
Churn and conflicts of interest
Alongside capability, the impact of ‘churn’ has been similarly highlighted as posing considerable challenges across the Civil Service. The Committee’s report acknowledges that while the lengthy nature of many major projects makes a certain level of staff turnover inevitable, and sometimes desirable as projects unfold, there are undeniably negative consequences that can only be partially mitigated against; such as the potential for conflicts of interest. It recommends that a successor Committee focus on potential solutions to this acute challenge.
Political pressure in planning
The report argues that a poorly planned project often never recovers, and pre-approval scrutiny of business cases must therefore be robust and unvarnished in its ultimate assessment of project viability. Whilst it is entirely appropriate for Ministers to initiate projects, political pressure must not undermine in this scrutiny process.
Evaluating project benefits
The report fully accepts the difficulties inherent in forecasting the benefits of major projects, and subsequently evaluating whether they have been delivered as planned. However, it underlines that major projects should not be viewed as an end in themselves but rather as a way of delivering public policy goals. The linkage between projects and the needs they are supposed to address, and proper evaluation of whether they have done so, cannot be overlooked when considering how best to deliver them in the future.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Chair comments on Premier League announcement on player salaries06/04/2020 15:33:00
DCMS Committee Chair Julian Knight MP has commented on Premier League announcement on player salaries.
Chairs call for Government to support people with no recourse to public funds06/04/2020 11:33:00
Rt Hon Stephen Timms, Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee has called on the Government to ensure workers who have no recourse to public funds because of their immigration status are properly supported during the coronavirus outbreak.
Chair calls on administrators to ensure vulnerable customers are protected02/04/2020 15:33:00
Rachel Reeves, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee has written to Grant Thornton, administrators of Caversham Finance Ltd in relation to the collapse of ‘rent-to-own’ business BrightHouse, to ensure that vulnerable BrightHouse customers are protected.
Coronavirus Business Interruption Loans – Chair writes to Chancellor01/04/2020 15:33:00
Rachel Reeves, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee has written to Rishi Sunak, outlining a series of concerns regarding the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS).
Close UK-EU cooperation needed in financial services after Brexit30/03/2020 15:33:00
The House of Lords EU Financial Affairs Sub-Committee has written to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rt Hon.
Committee presses for clear answer on benefit sanctions30/03/2020 12:43:00
The Work and Pensions Committee recently (26 March 2020) published the latest correspondence with the Department for Work and Pensions on the implications of the coronavirus outbreak.
European Statutory Instruments Committee publishes third report of Session 2019-2127/03/2020 11:15:00
Following the Committee’s meeting on Tuesday 24 March, its third report of Session 2019-21 has been published.
The impact of COVID-19 on education and children’s services26/03/2020 15:33:00
The implications of the coronavirus pandemic for the education sector and the impact on children and young people will be examined in a wide-ranging inquiry by the Education Committee.
Coronavirus – workers need clear guidance, Chair says25/03/2020 13:33:00
Rachel Reeves, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee, has written to Alok Sharma, Secretary of State for BEIS to call for clearer Government coronavirus guidance for workers to help address concerns that workers are being forced to go to work or that their employer is not offering enough support.