National Ombudsmen
Printable version

City council censured for complaints response

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has heavily criticised Bristol City Council for failing to provide evidence it had completed recommendations in two separate complaints.

Investigations into the complaints, which involved missed bin collections and noise nuisances, were completed in early 2020. In both cases the council accepted the Ombudsman’s decision and its recommendations to put things right for the men who had complained, and to improve its services for other people in the city.

Owing to the COVID-19 crisis, the Ombudsman suspended chasing the council for evidence it had complied with the recommendations during the first lockdown in Spring 2020.

Once it resumed its casework, in both cases the Ombudsman contacted the council, including the Chief Executive, numerous times for a response. But it was not until the Ombudsman registered fresh complaints in November 2020 that the council provided the evidence needed to comply.

The council has explained to the Ombudsman it recognises it had an issue with “case handling resource problems”. It carried out an independent internal investigation resulting in recommendations for improvements being made to the Chief Executive. The council says actions have been implemented in most of its cases from October 2020.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

“Good complaints handling should be at the heart of any local authority’s corporate governance arrangements and oversight, but it is clear from these two cases there were significant issues in the city.

“I am pleased the council has acknowledged and identified there have been problems with its complaint handling. However, it should not have taken our intervention - including months of chasing, and our decision to register new complaints - to trigger this.

“This report demonstrates the efforts to which we go, to ensure councils follow-through on their commitments to put things right, and how we will hold them to account if they don’t. I hope councils across the country will take lessons from it and ensure their own complaints arrangements meet the standards both we, and the people they serve, expect.”

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has agreed to apologise to both men for not carrying out the actions previously agreed. It will also pay them £100 to recognise the frustration and uncertainty caused.

The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council has agreed to review its revised arrangements for monitoring complaints and ensuring compliance with any future recommendations made. It will also ensure waste collection monitoring arrangements are robust so it can provide evidence of monitoring in future cases.

In addition, the council still needs to satisfy the Ombudsman on an outstanding original recommendation made in the waste collection case which was to update and provide a copy of its written missed collections policy.

Downloads:  REPORT 20 007 914 and 20 007 915 Bristol City

Original article link: https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2021/may/city-council-censured-for-complaints-response

Share this article

Latest News from
National Ombudsmen

400 DAYS LATER: ITs Path out of Covid