Civitas - Muslims targeted for supporting counter-extremism initiatives – new report
Liberal Muslims working on counter-terrorism and counter-extremism are routinely subjected to abuse and intimidation, a new Civitas study shows.
Some have been forced to move home and install CCTV, such is the scale of harassment they have received for supporting initiatives designed to weed out extremists and bring communities together.
In one case, the Iranian state became involved in subjecting a community mosque to extreme pressure and intimidation. In another, a small community nursery was forced to return a valuable stream of government funding after coming under pressure for engaging with counter-extremism initiatives.
The report features case studies and testimony from counter-extremism practitioners who describe how the abuse has affected their social circles after they have been accused of spying on their community or accepting money from the security services for their views on extremism.
The findings illustrate how efforts to tackle extremism and terrorism are being undermined by severe peer pressure on those prepared to help.
Tactics include online campaigns of abuse and shunning, led by Islamist extremists and often amplified by far-left activists. Muslims working on initiatives such as Prevent are frequently labelled with abusive terms such as ‘Uncle Tom’ or ‘native informant’ or are accused of ‘betraying the Muslim community’.
In some cases, they had been forced to abandon lifelong friendships and seen romantic relationships suffer as a result.
The report is authored by Civitas research fellow Liam Duffy, who interviewed a wide range of figures in Muslim communities who have faced harassment and intimidation. He called for more support to be offered those who cooperate with initiatives:
‘The support of Muslims is essential to the success of counter-extremism initiatives. But those who cooperate are too often made to pay a price for doing so, facing online campaigns of abuse, reputational smears and sometimes even the threat of physical harm.
‘The psychological impact of this abuse is clear. We need to do a better job of protecting and supporting Muslims and Muslim community groups working on this sensitive agenda. If we don’t, then fewer and fewer people will come forward to support this important work.’
Fiyaz Mughal, Founder and Director of Faith Matters, commented in the report:
‘These groups pose a serious threat not only to public discourse, but to the peaceful and law-abiding Muslims they try to intimidate into silence.’
Former Labour Councillor and founder of the Social Action and Research Foundation (SARF), Amina Lone, said:
‘The tactics used to silence anyone who dares to question, critique or reject political Islam include harassment, stalking on social media and highlighting your views to undermine or “expose” you to audiences, online bullying, personal threats, abuse of loved ones, pressure applied to older men within your circles including husbands, fathers and brothers.’
The report’s recommendations include:-
- Strengthening support for community groups from local councillors and MPs;
- Introducing a ‘Distress Call’ mechanism for those coming under attack, allowing likeminded groups or individuals who are willing to publicly defend allies;
- Social media and media training to help groups and individuals to fend off attacks in the press and online;
- Better awareness among policymakers and authorities of the diversity within the UK’s Muslim population;
- Better engagement of the private sector in Prevent and counter-extremism initiatives.
Liam Duffy said:
‘There is a deliberate attempt to undermine the standing and credibility of certain individuals in the eyes of British Muslims, which in turn undermines counter-terrorism, counter-extremism and integration efforts. The framing of those Muslims working on these issues as somehow betraying their communities
haemorrhages support for vital government programmes.
‘Efforts to counter extremism and terrorism will be ultimately unsuccessful without the support and engagement of Muslim communities. It is therefore essential that there is greater awareness of the social, and sometimes physical, price that Muslims working on these agendas are being forced to pay by Islamists and their political allies and enablers.
‘At its heart, the campaign against Muslims participating in initiatives designed to curb extremism and radicalisation are symptomatic of a broader struggle over control of the narrative of Islam and being Muslim in Western democracies.’
The 'No True Muslim' Fallacy
Latest News from
IEA: Labour Party is “wrong to focus purely on social housing”21/11/2019 15:35:00
Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to Labour’s manifesto announcement, calling for the biggest council and social house building programme for decades
IEA - Merging taxes not “tinkering with NI thresholds” would better help low-paid21/11/2019 14:35:00
Editorial and Research Fellow Professor Len Shackleton responded to the Conservative Party’s announcement to raise the National Insurance threshold for workers
The King’s Fund responds to the Liberal Democrat manifesto21/11/2019 13:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King's Fund, commented on the Liberal Democrat manifesto
IEA responds to Liberal Democrats’ manifesto21/11/2019 12:35:00
Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs Mark Littlewood commented on the Liberal Democrats’ manifesto
Liberal Democrats Manifesto: A jump to the left on economics, says ASI21/11/2019 11:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to the Liberal Democrats Manifesto announcement.
Demos - Create a National Minimum Wage for the self-employed, says think tank21/11/2019 10:35:00
A new report from Demos looking at financial security for the modern, liquid workforce is calling for the next government to introduce a Self-Employed National Minimum Wage, as a crucial step towards improving financial security for lower paid self-employed workers.
IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults21/11/2019 09:35:00
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council