Civitas - The Single Market has benefited non-members more than Britain and other founding signatories
Export growth to the EU has been strongest among non-EU countries since the foundation of the Single Market.
UK exports to the EU have grown more slowly than those of the rest of the Single Market’s founding members.
Britain’s export growth to the rest of the Single Market has slowed by about a fifth compared with its performance during the Common Market.
UK exports to other EU nations have grown more slowly since the start of the Single Market than those of the rest of its founding members – and have been especially outstripped by exports from non-EU nations.
A new Civitas analysis lays bare the paradox of the European Single Market in that it has boosted the exports of countries outside the trade bloc more than its members, particularly Britain’s.
The UK’s exports have benefited least of all from the Single Market created in 1992, declining from the rate of growth they had been on already as part of the Common Market (since 1973).
The intra-EU exports of all 12 founding members was 14.6% lower, while the exports of non-member OECD countries to the EU were just 2.05% lower.
‘In terms of the growth of exports of goods, non-member countries have been its main beneficiaries,’ Burrage writes in Myth and Paradox of the Single Market: How the trade benefits of EU membership have been mis-sold.
‘The 20 years of the Single Market do not seem to have been particularly successful in terms of the growth of member countries’ exports to each other. Far from there being a detectable surge after the inauguration, or a faster rate of growth, they have failed to keep pace with growth over the Common Market years.’
In his analysis of official trade statistics, Burrage shows how the growth of exports between member states over the Common Market years was 4.7% and then fell during the Single Market years to 3.0%.
Over the same period the UK’s export growth to other single market members showed an even more marked fall from 5.38 per cent to 3.09 per cent.
‘While the Single Market cannot be counted a success in export terms for the EU as a whole, for the UK it must be counted at the very least a massive disappointment, and not far short of a disaster. There has been no discernible benefit for UK exports to fellow members from the Single Market programme.’
Burrage provides a unique comparison of exports growth between the Common Market and Single Market years by extending the exponential trendlines from the years 1973-1992 through the years 1993-2012. When these exponential trendlines are compared with the real rate of the growth of exports over these same two decades of the Single Market, they show that:
- UK exports growth during the Single Market years was 22.3% lower than it would have been had it continued at its rate during the Common Market;
- The exports of all 12 founder members of the Single Market to each other have been 14.6 per cent lower than if they had continued to grow as they had done under the Common Market;
- Exports of non-member OECD countries to the EU were just 2.05% lower.
Burrage writes that: ‘Supposedly disadvantaged non-members have, in other words, come closer to keeping pace with their export performance under the Common Market than the members of the Single Market exporting to each other, and very much closer than the UK, despite not having been sitting round the table and helping to make the rules.
‘This is counter-intuitive, and profoundly paradoxical. It flies in the face of the claims about the advantages of the Single Market for UK trade that have been made over many years by Britain’s political leaders.
‘Overall, as they stand, these figures offer little support to the argument that membership of the Single Market is essential if the UK is to maintain or increase the rate of growth of its exports to the Single Market.’
Michael Burrage is a sociologist by training, was a Fulbright scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, and lectured at the London School of Economics for many years, specialising in cross-national analysis of industrial enterprise and professional institutions. He has spent spells as a research fellow at Harvard, at the Swedish Collegium of Advanced Study, Uppsala, at the Free University of Berlin and at the Center for Higher Education Studies and the Institute of Government of the University of California Berkeley. He has been British Council lecturer at the University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, and also a visiting professor at Kyoto, Hokkaido, Kansai and Hosei universities in Japan.
His previous Civitas publications include Where’s the Insider Advantage? A review of the evidence that withdrawal from the EU would not harm the UK’s exports or foreign investment in the UK (2014).
The Myth and Paradox of the Single Market: How the trade benefits of EU membership have been mis-sold
Latest News from
CSJ - Unsafe Children: Child Sexual Abuse And Exploitation13/04/2021 10:35:00
Child sexual abuse (CSA) in this country is nothing short of an epidemic. The Crime Survey of England and Wales estimates that 3.1 million adults were victims/survivors of child sexual abuse before they turned 16 which is likely to be a highly conservative estimate.
IEA experts comment on roadmap’s second stage13/04/2021 09:35:00
Government’s refusal to depart from “outdated” plan is “costing billions”.
Civitas - Anti-racism industry creating a dependency upon race experts in which ‘racial divisions are becoming ever more firmly entrenched’, says think-tank report08/04/2021 10:35:00
The anti-racism industry ‘creates a dependency’ upon a race discourse that sows division, finds a new Civitas report. ‘The tragic consequence’, the report finds, ‘is that racial divisions are becoming ever more firmly entrenched’.
The King’s Fund response to The Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities report02/04/2021 09:10:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, commented on the report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities
UK economy will likely bounce back “more strongly than many expect,” says IEA expert01/04/2021 14:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the latest GDP data from the Office for National Statistics
Civitas - ‘Nurturing Britain’s high-tech capabilities’ and ‘safeguarding critical industries’ should be central to managing potential risks of economic dependence on China, think-tank report finds01/04/2021 13:35:00
‘British policymakers should think carefully about the degree of economic reliance on China that it is wise to tolerate where critical infrastructure is concerned’, a new think-tank paper suggests.
Commit to new deal for healthcare workers or risk ‘deadly exodus’, IPPR warns government01/04/2021 12:35:00
As many as one in four healthcare workers – equivalent to 330,000 staff - say they are more likely to leave the NHS due to a year of unprecedented pressure, according to new polling by IPPR/YouGov. The figure - which includes the equivalent of 100,000 nurses and 8,000 midwives – adds pressure to a workforce that was experiencing a crisis of unfilled vacancies even before the pandemic.
UK right to call for WTO reform, says IEA expert01/04/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that Britain it to use its G7 presidency to press for reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
IFS - Scottish Government funding per person is over 30% higher than equivalent English funding. But it has still chosen to use temporary COVID funding to pay for some new permanent spending commitments.01/04/2021 10:35:00
Real-terms funding for the Scottish Government’s day-to-day (or resource) spending in 2021-22 is still set to be 2% lower per person than in 2010-11, after excluding temporary COVID-19 related funding, and adjusting for new responsibilities.