Criminal Cases Review Commission
Commission refers the sexual offences conviction of Neil Secker to the Court of Appeal
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the sexual offences conviction of Neil Secker to the Court of Appeal.
Mr Secker appeared at Norfolk Crown Court in September 2016 charged with five counts of sexual assault against the same person. He pleaded not guilty to all. The jury acquitted him of the first two counts but convicted him of the remaining three. He was sentenced to four and a half years’ imprisonment.
Mr Secker tried to appeal against his conviction but his application for leave to appeal was dismissed in February 2017. In June 2017 he applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for a review of his conviction.
Having reviewed the case in detail, the Commission has decided to refer Mr Secker’s conviction to the Court of Appeal because it considers there is a real possibility that the Court will quash Mr Secker’s convictions on the basis of post-trial information which is capable of significantly undermining the credibility and reliability of the complainant.
Mr Secker was represented in his application to the CCRC by Norton Peskett Solicitors.
This press release was issued by Justin Hawkins, Head of Communication, Criminal Cases Review Commission, on 0121 232 0906 or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Notes for editors
- The Commission is an independent body set up under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995. It is responsible for independently reviewing suspected and alleged miscarriages of criminal justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It is based in Birmingham and is funded by the Ministry of Justice.
- There are currently 12 Commissioners who bring to the Commission considerable experience from a wide variety of backgrounds. Commissioners are appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the Prime Minister in accordance with the Office for the Commissioner for Public Appointments’ Code of Practice.
- The Commission usually receives around 1,500 applications for reviews (convictions and/or sentences) each year. Typically, around 3.5%, or one in 29, of all applications are referred to the appeal courts.
- The Commission considers whether, as a result of new evidence or argument, there is a real possibility that the conviction would not be upheld were a reference to be made. New evidence or argument is argument or evidence which has not been raised during the trial or on appeal. Applicants should usually have appealed first. A case can be referred in the absence of new evidence or argument or an earlier appeal only if there are “exceptional circumstances”.
- If a case is referred, it is then for the appeal court to decide whether the conviction is unsafe or the sentence unfair.
Latest News from
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Commission refers the terrorism related case of Michael Devine to the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal.12/04/2019 13:20:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the case of Michael Devine to the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal.
Commission refers the case of Ms E to the Crown Court28/03/2019 16:42:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the case of SE to the Crown Court.
Commission refers the terrorism related case of Nicholas Roddis to the Court of Appeal27/03/2019 13:10:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the case of Nicholas Roddis to the Court of Appeal.
Commission refers the human trafficking related case of GB to the Court of Appeal04/03/2019 10:10:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred to the Court of Appeal the false passport conviction of GB.
CCRC disclosure review update15/02/2019 12:20:00
The second phase of the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s internal review of disclosure is now well underway with more than twenty detailed reviews completed.
Commission refers drink driving conviction of William Smith to the County Court of Northern Ireland12/02/2019 16:15:00
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the drink driving conviction of William Smith to the County Court in Northern Ireland.
CCRC Chairman Helen Pitcher welcomes independent scrutiny of Commission from publication of Government’s Tailored Review and new academic research08/02/2019 15:20:00
It is a stroke of good fortune for me that within a few months of my starting as Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission there should be two separate and independent accounts scrutinizing how the organisation does its job.
Commission refers the terrorism related conviction of Ismail Abdurahman to the Court of Appeal07/02/2019 13:43:00
Ismail Abdurahman was convicted in February 2008 of assisting an offender and failing to disclose information about acts of terrorism.