Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committee calls for evidence on the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
The Joint Committee on Human Rights yesterday launched a call for evidence into the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill that was introduced into the House of Commons on 24 September 2020.
- Inquiry: Legislative Scrutiny: Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
- Joint Committee on Human Rights
The Bill introduces “a statutory power for the security and intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies and a limited number of other public authorities to authorise Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) to participate in criminal conduct where it is necessary and proportionate to do so for a limited set of specified purposes.”
The Committee are concerned about the human rights implications of the Bill, particularly as it has no express limit on what criminal conduct can be authorised. Not only this, but the Bill covers the authorisation of criminal conduct by a wide range of public authorities, from the intelligence services and the police to the Gambling Commission and the Food Standards Agency.
Call for evidence
As such, the Committee have released a call for evidence on this issue and are interested in submissions from the public that address the following:
- Is a statutory power to authorise criminal conduct by CHIS justified?
- Is the Bill sufficiently clear as to who can be authorised to carry out criminal conduct and in what circumstances? Has the Bill struck the right balance in this regard?
- Is the threshold test for making criminal conduct authorisations adequate to prevent human rights violations?
- Does the Bill contain sufficient protections for human rights?
- Are there types of offences that should never be authorised? Should there be a statutory limit on the types of offences that can be authorised under a criminal conduct authorisation?
- Is the range of public authorities who will be able to make criminal conduct authorisations appropriate?
- Particularly in light of the secret nature of criminal conduct authorisations, is oversight by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner an adequate safeguard against abuse? What other safeguards might be appropriate?
- Should the Bill also provide for compensation for the victims of authorised criminal conduct and cover how they will be treated by the state?
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government rejects MPs’ calls to legally define honour-based abuse19/09/2023 11:25:00
The Government has rejected calls by MPs to introduce a statutory definition of so-called honour-based abuse, despite warnings that it risks remaining a hidden crime without improved understanding of its complexities among frontline agencies and better victim support.
Government must better guide and support Whitehall to reset failing projects18/09/2023 15:05:00
The resetting of failing major programmes by Whitehall is made more difficult by a lack of guidance and structure from Government.
The Committee on Standards has released a report on the conduct of Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP18/09/2023 12:05:00
This report arises from an investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards into whether Mr Sunak had breached paragraph 13 of the 2023 Code of Conduct for Members, relating to the confidentiality of the Commissioner's investigations.
Legislation needed to continue great British success story of self-driving vehicles15/09/2023 15:15:00
The Transport Committee publishes its report on the future of self-driving vehicles (SDVs) and how the Government should approach their introduction to the UK’s roads.
More should be done to promote Scotland globally ‘beyond the tartan’ but positive signs of collaboration between governments, MPs find13/09/2023 16:15:00
MPs on the Scottish Affairs Committee found evidence the UK and Scottish Governments often collaborate well when promoting Scotland’s interests abroad but more work is needed to highlight modern Scottish successes in sectors such as Science and Space.
Office for Students underperforming amid looming crisis in higher education13/09/2023 15:10:00
The Committee’s report on the Office for Students (OfS) finds that the regulator has poor relations with providers and students, a controlling and arbitrary approach to regulation, and lacks independence from the Government.
Government rejects calls to improve accountability of Whitehall’s non-executive directors12/09/2023 16:25:00
The Government has rejected calls by MPs to strengthen the accountability and transparency measures governing Whitehall’s non-executive directors (NEDs), a role designed to provide independent scrutiny and oversee the work of Government departments.
Government rejects action to boost NHS specialist digital workforce06/09/2023 15:15:00
Ministers have rejected a call by the Committee to pay higher salaries to boost the NHS’s digital workforce to allow it to compete with the private sector.