Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committee recommends amendments to Judicial Review and Courts Bill
The Joint Committee on Human Rights has called on the Government to amend proposals in the Judicial Review and Courts Bill which have the potential to deny effective judicial remedies and remove a safeguard against flawed asylum decisions.
- Read the full report (HTML)
- Read the full report (PDF)
- Read the report summary
- Read the report's conclusions and recommendations
- Find all publications related to this inquiry, including oral and written evidence
Judicial review is a crucial component of the rule of law, holding public authorities to account by checking that their decisions and actions comply with the law and enabling those affected to enforce their rights. The Judicial Review and Courts Bill makes changes to how judicial review operates and the Joint Committee on Human Rights has undertaken legislative scrutiny to examine the impact of these changes on human rights.
The Bill proposes changes to the courts’ power to make ‘quashing orders’ – i.e. orders that nullify or invalidate decisions or measures made by public authorities. It would introduce a power to delay a quashing order coming into effect (a ‘suspended quashing order’) and a power to prevent a quashing order affecting the lawfulness of things that have already happened (a ‘prospective-only quashing order’). Use of this latter power could result in people who have already been affected by an unlawful measure, including the person bringing the judicial review claim, getting no remedy or relief.
Concerningly, the Bill would not merely allow the use of these powers, but actually require them to be used in certain circumstances. The Joint Committee calls on the Government to remove this requirement as it would place an unnecessary limit on the courts’ freedom to decide on the appropriate remedy to unlawful government decisions. It further calls for the legislation to be amended so that when courts consider whether to make a suspended or prospective-only quashing order they must have regard for the human rights, including the right to an effective remedy guaranteed by Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, of any individual affected.
The Bill proposes to make changes to so-called ‘Cart’ judicial reviews that would effectively prevent claimants from using judicial review to challenge Upper Tribunal decisions to refuse permission to appeal. The Government argues that these judicial review claims are expensive and have a low success rate, however the report finds that they can provide an important protection against legal error. Given that ‘Cart’ judicial reviews predominantly concern immigration and asylum claims, the Joint Committee finds that their removal could result in people being wrongfully removed from the UK, putting them at risk of grave human rights violations in their country of origin. It calls on the Government to attempt procedural reform, for example extending time limits for cases to be brought, before removing a potentially crucial safeguard against tribunal errors.
The proposal to remove ‘Cart’ judicial reviews amounts to an ‘ouster clause’, that would remove an area of decision making from review by the courts. The Joint Committee is additionally concerned by suggestions from the Government that they would use a similar approach in other areas of legislation in the future. The Joint Committee finds that this could significantly undermine judicial review of public bodies and weaken a crucial mechanism for enforcing rights. It warns the Government to exercise great caution in the use of ouster clauses to ensure that accountability is maintained and human rights protected.
Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Harriet Harman MP said:
“Human rights are meaningless unless people can enforce them and those who breach rights are held to account. Judicial review is of fundamental importance in allowing someone who claims their rights have been breached by Government action to take the Government to court.
“Governments should welcome that accountability not seek to dilute it. This bill dilutes the power of the courts to order redress and should be amended. The plan to carve out further areas from judicial review scrutiny should be resisted.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
European Statutory Instruments Committee publishes Ninth report14/01/2022 15:33:00
Following the Committee's meeting on Tuesday 11 January, its ninth report of Session 2021-22 has been published.
Public funding for cricket must depend on progress to tackle racism14/01/2022 11:38:00
The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s Report into racism in cricket urges the Government to limit public funding for the game unless there is demonstrable progress on ridding racist behaviour from clubs and among spectators.
Committee on Standards releases a report on the conduct of Daniel Kawczynski MP14/01/2022 10:15:00
This report arises from an investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards into Mr Kawczynski’s conduct, following a complaint from the Chair of the Independent Expert Panel (IEP).
Central bank digital currencies: a solution in search of a problem? Report published13/01/2022 16:20:00
The Economic Affairs Committee has published its report, ‘Central bank digital currencies: a solution in search of a problem?’
‘Chemical cocktail’ of sewage, slurry and plastic polluting English rivers puts public health and nature at risk13/01/2022 13:33:00
Poor water quality in English rivers is a result of chronic underinvestment and multiple failures in monitoring, governance and enforcement, the Environmental Audit Committee warns.
DEFRA’s plan for post-EU land and farming subsidies based on “blind optimism”11/01/2022 11:25:00
Plans for the scheme to replace the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy depend on changes in land use that bring both increased farm productivity and environmental benefits, but in a report published yesterday the Public Accounts Committee says Defra itself concedes “its confidence in the scheme looks like blind optimism”.
Housing crisis needs action on planning, SMEs and housing for elderly, says Lords report10/01/2022 14:20:00
The Built Environment Committee has published its report, ‘Meeting housing demand’, which concludes that the Government must address barriers to building much needed new homes.
MPs to examine how culture can engineer the levelling up agenda07/01/2022 14:25:00
The role that culture might play in delivering a Government commitment to level up the country is the focus of a new inquiry launched today, Reimagining where we live: cultural placemaking and the levelling up agenda.
Work and Pensions Committee publishes Government response to report20/12/2021 12:20:00
The Work and Pensions Committee recently (18 December 2021) published the DWP’s response to its report on the Government’s approach to ensuring pension funds consider the risks posed by climate change and the role schemes can play in meeting emission reduction targets.