Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committees publish Bill to end exploitation in the gig economy
The Work and Pensions and Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committees publish a joint report and draft Bill to close the loopholes that allow companies to use bogus "self-employment" status as a route to cheap labour and tax avoidance, saying the law must not allow willingness to exploit workers to be a competitive advantage.
- Read the report summary
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: A framework for modern employment
Put good business on a level playing field
Rt Hon Frank Field MP, Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, said:
"The two Committees are today presenting the Prime Minister with an opportunity to fulfil the promise she made on the steps of Downing Street on her first day in office, with a draft Bill that would end the mass exploitation of ordinary, hard-working people in the gig economy.
The Bill would put good business on a level playing field, not being undercut by bad business.
It is time to close the loopholes that allow irresponsible companies to underpay workers, avoid taxes and free ride on our welfare system."
New laws and tougher enforcement needed to protect workers
Rachel Reeves MP, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, said:
"Uber, Deliveroo and others like to bang the drum for the benefits of flexibility for their workforce but currently all the burden of this flexibility is picked up by taxpayers and workers. This must change.
We say that companies should pay higher wages when they are asking people to work extra hours or on zero-hours contracts.
Recent cases demonstrate a need for greater clarity in the law to protect workers. Responsible businesses deserve a level-playing field to compete, not a system which rewards unscrupulous businesses.
We need new laws but also much tougher enforcement, to weed out those businesses seeking to exploit complex labour laws, and workers, for their competitive advantage."
- The current situation puts an unacceptable burden on workers to address poor practice through an expensive and risky court case while the companies themselves operate with relative impunity.
- Clarified legislation to protect the legitimately self-employed and a new presumption of "worker by default" would require companies to provide basic safety net standards of rights and benefits to their workers—or prove that their working practices are genuinely reflecting of self-employment.
- An obligation on employment tribunals to consider the increased use of higher, punitive fines and costs orders if an employer has already lost a similar case, and enabling use of class actions in disputes over wages, status and working time, would reduce the chance and opportunity for employers to simply "wait and see" whether individuals are willing to risk pursuing their rights.
- A flexible labour force can benefit workers, consumers and businesses – but it is not acceptable that the gig economy burden workers and taxpayers with the risks of this flexibility.
- Workers should not be faced with a choice between not working, or working for below minimum wage.
- The Government should rule out introducing any legislation that would undermine the National Minimum Wage/National Living Wage.
- The loophole that enables agency workers to be paid less than permanent employees doing the same job must be closed.
- Companies should either guarantee hours that reflect the periods worked each week, or compensate workers for uncertainty.
- Currently, employers need only fear an inspection of their labour practices "once every 500 years"- and receive only paltry fines if they are found to be breaking the law.
- The enforcement bodies and the Director of Labour Market Enforcement urgently need more resources - paid for by a significant increase in fines for offending employers - to root out bad practice.
- Companies that flout the law, and those that tolerate exploitation in their supply chains, should be "named and shamed". In the longer term, embargoing of goods from non-compliant businesses has potential as a "very strong incentive" for retailers to promote compliance in their supply chains
- Enabling enforcement bodies to issue punitive fines for noncompliance would also help ensure that the risks of being caught outweigh the gains companies stand from illegal pay and practices.
- Concentrated "deep dives" in industry sectors and geographic areas, where there is evidence of abuse, by all the enforcing bodies should become a regular part of the armour to protect vulnerable low paid workers.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Response rates to written parliamentary questions a mixed bag15/12/2017 14:05:00
The Procedure Committee’s report into written Parliamentary questions in the 2016–17 session of Parliament has shown improvements in the response rate of some Government departments, but cause for concern in others.
Local authority culture change needed to ensure effective scrutiny15/12/2017 13:05:00
The Government must encourage a culture change at local authorities to ensure overview and scrutiny is truly independent of the executive and can properly contribute to improving services for taxpayers, the Communities and Local Government Committee concludes.
Unauthorised redundancy payments a shocking waste of taxpayers' money15/12/2017 12:05:00
The Public Accounts Committee report says that during 2016–17 HS2 Ltd made £1.76 million of unauthorised payments to staff—a shocking waste of taxpayers' money—through compulsory and voluntary redundancy schemes offered at enhanced terms well in excess of those authorised by the Department for Transport.
Agreement on standstill transitional arrangements between UK and EU27 is now urgent15/12/2017 10:32:00
Treasury Committee report says transition must be simple enough to negotiate within a matter of weeks.