Council decided couple tried to avoid care fees by helping daughter buy house
South Gloucestershire Council has been asked to apologise to an elderly couple after deciding they deliberately deprived themselves of capital in order to reduce the husband’s care costs.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found the council did not take into consideration all the relevant facts when it decided the couple had deliberately deprived themselves of their assets.
An Ombudsman’s investigation found the council did not fully explore the reasons why the couple had transferred money to their daughter and son-in-law, before reaching its decision, and did not provide the couple with the reasons for its decision
The investigation also found the council did not carry out a financial assessment in line with the Care Act, Ombudsman Michael King, yesterday said:
“The guidance says people should be treated with dignity and are free to spend their income as they see fit – including, in this case, making a similar gift to one daughter as they have done previously for their other adult children.
“The council’s actions have caused this family additional stress and worry, at a time when the wife was already faced with the emotional trauma of placing her husband into a nursing home.
“South Gloucestershire Council now needs to consider our report and consider what action it will take.”
The husband, who has a number of health conditions including Parkinson’s Disease and dementia, had been living with his wife in their family home. Over the years the family had spent significant sums to adapt the home and garden to ensure he could remain there for as long as possible.
In the 1980s and 1990s the couple gave three of their children help to purchase their houses. Their fourth had been living in tied accommodation to her husband’s job, and so had not needed help to buy until he retired.
The husband’s condition deteriorated at the same time as the couple’s daughter needed help to buy a house.
He was placed in a nursing home and a financial assessment of the couple took into account the money they had recently given to their daughter and son-in-law. This meant they had to pay the full cost of his care, which they said they could not afford.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services.
In this case the council should apologise to the family and pay the wife £250 to recognise the distress the situation has caused her. It should also review its decision that the couple deprived themselves of capital to avoid care charges, after first giving the wife the chance to provide further evidence to support her case.
It should give the wife a properly reasoned decision showing the evidence it has considered in accordance with statutory guidance.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve a council’s processes for the wider public. In this case the council should review its current procedures and guidance for staff on how to deal with cases where deprivation of capital may have occurred. It should also ensure financial assessments are carried out at the correct time.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Councils mustn’t throw out the rule book in the face of pressure, says Ombudsman04/12/2018 12:05:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has challenged local authorities not to “throw out the rule book” when redesigning services in the face of budget and resource pressures.
Social care pressures reflected in Ombudsman’s annual review of complaints29/11/2018 11:15:00
Over the past year, the Ombudsman has become increasingly concerned about the way some authorities are handling the need to balance the pressures they are under with the way they assess and charge for care.
Bedford couple’s support withdrawal highlights special guardianship concerns21/11/2018 11:15:00
Special guardians deserve the right advice and support from councils before taking on the role, says the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Elderly man with Alzheimer’s disease died when agency failed to provide night care19/11/2018 15:25:00
An elderly man with Alzheimer’s disease died following a fall from bed when an agency night carer failed to attend his home.
Ombudsman welcomes CMA report on care homes19/11/2018 12:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman recently (16 November 2018) welcomed the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA) guidance to care homes.
Profession-wide complaints handling initiative for the dental sector16/11/2018 12:15:00
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman are committed to improving frontline complaint handling in the NHS. In support of that commitment we, along with other organisations from the dental and health sector, have contributed to the development of a profession-wide complaints handling initiative for the dental sectorOpens in a new window.
Surrey County Council twice failed to resolve issues for boy with special needs15/11/2018 16:15:00
Surrey County Council has been told to apologise again to the family of a boy with special educational needs because it failed to do what it promised to resolve problems highlighted in a previous Ombudsman complaint.