Competition & Markets Authority
Deal between Carlsberg and Marston’s given the go-ahead
The CMA has cleared the proposed joint venture between brewing companies Carlsberg and Marston’s.
Both companies are large brewers of beer and cider, as well as offering related services, such as wholesale supply of their own and other producers’ drinks to pubs and restaurants. Marston’s also owns a significant number of pubs located across the UK.
The decision by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) follows an investigation into several possible ways in which the deal could harm competition in the supply of beer and cider in the UK.
As pubs currently owned or operated by Marston’s might choose to sell fewer independent brands after the merger in favour of more Carlsberg products, the CMA considered whether access to pubs by smaller independent brewers could be adversely affected as a result of the deal.
The CMA found, however, that Marston’s pubs form only a small part of the potential UK customer base for brewers, and that independent brewers would continue to have sufficient access to pubs after the merger, allowing them to compete effectively.
The CMA also considered whether combining the wholesaling services that both companies provide, through which they distribute their own and other producers’ drinks to pubs and restaurants, could raise competition concerns. While the establishment of the joint venture means that the 2 businesses are likely to distribute each other’s products more frequently, potentially leaving less room to take on other brands, the CMA found that brewers will continue to have sufficient alternative wholesalers to choose from after the merger.
In relation to their role as brewers, the CMA found that Carlsberg and Marston’s have different areas of focus, meaning competition between the 2 businesses is generally limited at present, with Carlsberg largely focusing on the production of lager and Marston’s focusing on ale. They also face several competitors in all of the product categories where they are both active.
The CMA’s investigation has therefore concluded that the deal does not give rise to competition concerns.
For more information, including a summary of the CMA’s decision, please visit the Carlsberg UK Holdings Limited / Marston’s PLC merger inquiry page.
Latest News from
Competition & Markets Authority
Customers could lose out in motor parts merger21/10/2020 12:20:00
The CMA has provisionally found that the purchase of 3G by TVS raises competition concerns in the supply of commercial vehicle and trailer parts.
Schools could lose out in educational supplies merger19/10/2020 12:20:00
The CMA has provisionally found that YPO’s anticipated purchase of close competitor Findel could leave schools worse off.
Instagram to tackle hidden advertising after CMA action16/10/2020 15:38:00
Following CMA action, Instagram will do more to prevent hidden advertising on its app and website, signalling an important behaviour shift by a major platform.
Digital Markets: using our existing tools and emerging thoughts on a new regime09/10/2020 16:28:00
Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, delivers a keynote speech to the annual Fordham Competition Law Institute conference on the CMA’s existing tools and a new regime to support competition and innovation in digital markets.
CMA requests review of Virgin and O2 merger09/10/2020 15:38:00
The CMA has made a request to the European Commission to refer the proposed merger of Virgin Media and Virgin Mobile with O2 to the CMA for investigation.
Andrea Coscelli calls for new digital markets regulatory regime09/10/2020 15:08:00
Andrea Coscelli, CEO of the CMA, has spoken today at New York’s Fordham University about the need for digital reform and the latest thinking on a new regulatory regime.
Jonathan Scott to be interim chair of the Competition and Markets Authority09/10/2020 14:22:00
Mr Scott previously served as a senior independent member of the CMA board.
More than £1m in refunds secured for care home residents09/10/2020 12:20:00
The CMA has secured more than £1 million in refunds for those NHS funded residents at Care UK premium homes who paid an unfair additional fee towards essential care.