Demos - British public support ban on targeted political ads online
New research has found that calls for greater regulation in political campaigns have a far greater consensus of support among the general public than arguments against regulation.
A new report from Demos has found that 61% of people think profiling people based on their online data should be illegal, and the majority of the public think that companies providing services to data driven campaigns should be more tightly regulated.
Polis and the political process, written in partnership with the Open Rights Group (ORG), explores public attitudes regarding data driven political campaigning using a unique deliberative online tool, Polis. Demos used Polis to conduct nationally representative polling on statements provided by respondents themselves, and map out how attitudes around different issues interact.
The report also found:
- Overwhelming majorities agreed political campaigns should have to obey the same rules when they are advertising online as they do in leaflets or on TV (88%), that greater transparency is needed around political funding (84%), that political campaigns should publish all advertising materials (81%) and that they should publish how much they are spending (79%).
- There is a strong consensus among the British public that facts used in political campaigns need to be verified, and politicians responsible need to be held to account. 90% of respondents agreed that facts used in political campaigns need to be verified, whilst only 4% disagreed.
- On the other hand, 56% of people think there should be less red tape stopping politicians saying and doing what their voters want, and 52% say authorities shouldn’t control what politicians are allowed to say – suggesting public attitudes are malleable on these issues depending on the phrasing of the statement.
- The research found that the public are divided over whether targeted political campaigns have an influence on the way that they vote, with 46% of respondents saying political campaigns do not influence their voting intentions, and 41% saying political campaigns do influence their voting intentions.
- The public are also divided over whether politicians should be subject to international oversight. 42% of respondents thought that they should not, with 34% thinking that they should.
Commenting on the report’s findings, Harry Carr, Director of Innovation at Demos and Polis and the political process co-author said:
“As the report shows, there is a huge appetite for greater transparency and regulation when it comes to data driven political campaigns, especially if it means holding politicians to account; indeed, the majority would ban their practices outright.
“It also shows the unique value of our groundbreaking research tool, Polis, in allowing people to define the key issues of the debate in their own words, and mapping out the values and motivations that underlie their beliefs. It will provide an incredibly useful tool going forward to find the solutions to some of our thorniest policy issues.”
Pascal Crowe, Data and Democracy Project Officer at Open Rights Group and contributor to the report said:
“This report supports previous research on this topic by Open Rights Group. The public do not want to be targeted and have their rights abused by data driven political campaigns. While transparency is part of the solution, the public also just wants tight rules and heavier enforcement.
By contrast, Polis makes a positive case for using innovative technology in the democratic process. Rather than narrowing debate, encouraging polarisation and demeaning trust, this tool provides the opportunity to build public consensus in policy making.”
Read the full report here.
NOTES TO EDITORS
Polis allows respondents to interact with each other constructively – people submit their own statements in their own words, and other respondents view and react to them – and maps out where clusters of opinion emerge, highlighting areas of consensus between groups of differing attitudes. Demos has pioneered the use of Polis with a nationally representative sample.
Josh Tapper, Communications Officer, Demos
Open Rights Group
Demos is Britain’s leading cross-party think-tank: an independent, educational charity, which produces original and innovative research.
Latest News from
IFG - Disputes over Brexit increase the need to strengthen the Sewel convention17/09/2020 10:35:00
A new Institute for Government paper says the future of the Union could be put at risk without reforms to the principle of legislative consent which lies at the heart of the devolution settlement.
IFS - Large variation in earnings returns among postgraduate degrees, with returns of more than 15% for masters in business and law, but negative returns for many arts and humanities courses17/09/2020 09:35:00
Women with a masters degree earn considerably more at age 35 than those with only an undergraduate degree, with average earnings of £35,400, compared with £32,500 for those who do not go beyond undergraduate level. For men, the differences are even larger: masters graduates earn £55,800 on average, £5,000 more than those with only an undergraduate degree.
IFS - The long shadow of deprivation: Differences in opportunities across England15/09/2020 15:20:00
A socially mobile country provides equal opportunities for everyone, across big cities and small towns, and regardless of whether your parents are rich or poor. This report makes use of newly linked administrative data on all state-educated pupils born between 1986 and 1988 to follow a group of sons from where they grew up, looking at their family circumstances and their educational achievement, through to the labour market.
IPPR welcomes furlough reform plan proposed by Labour at TUC Conference15/09/2020 14:20:00
The think tank had previously called for such a scheme to prevent mass unemployment by encouraging part-time working
Labour market deterioration “not (yet) as bad as feared”, says IEA expert15/09/2020 12:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to the latest unemployment statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
JRF - Targeted furlough scheme needed as new research shows who is likely to lose their job15/09/2020 11:35:00
A new Pre-Vaccine Jobs Risk Index produced for JRF shows that sectors such as hospitality, retail and beauty, which rely on close contact with members of the public but are not within the sphere of health, care or essential services are likely to be hit hardest by coronavirus until a vaccine is found.
IFG - Deal or no deal, the government should adopt its own state aid regime15/09/2020 10:35:00
The UK would benefit from a strong ‘state aid’ system whether or not it strikes a trade deal with the EU, says a new report from the Institute for Government.
Demos - New research finds social fractures caused by Covid-19 are more divisive than Brexit15/09/2020 09:35:00
New research from the cross-party think tank Demos has found that Covid-19 has now caused deeper social fractures than Brexit. The poll finds that over half of mask wearers in Britain (58%) have severely negative attitudes towards non-mask wearers, and the vast majority (68%) of people who did not break lockdown rules have strong negative views about lockdown rule breakers.
Work Foundation report calls for Government to mitigate crisis facing retail workers10/09/2020 11:35:00
A new report from a leading UK think tank reveals the extent of insecurity within the retail sector and calls on Government to intervene and mitigate the crisis facing hundreds of thousands of workers.