Demos - New poll challenges assumption majority of Brits want to end freedom of movement
A new poll published last week by Demos think tank and ComRes shows Britons may hold more favourable attitudes towards freedom of movement than is sometimes believed.
The nationally representative poll asked respondents to choose between three reciprocal options for Britain’s immigration relationship with the European Union:
- Restrictions on free movement in the form of a points- based system or similar
- Free movement to continue, but with restrictions on the ability of [EU citizens in the UK, and UK citizens in EU countries] to claim benefits for the first 4 years after arrival, and on the free movement of citizens with criminal records
- Free movement to continue with no changes to the current system
The results showed only 20 per cent would back continuing the current arrangements of freedom of movement. But respondents were divided between continuing the principle of freedom of movement, while restricting access to welfare for four years and access for those with criminal records (41 per cent), and those who wanted to restrict free access by default and introduce a new ‘Australian-style’ points-based system or similar (39 per cent).
This means that 61 per cent of Britons would prefer to maintain some freedom of movement as the default position, with or without reform, compared to the 39 per cent who would like to scrap freedom of movement in favour of a points- based system or similar.
Reflecting three likely immigration options on the table for the Government in its Brexit negotiations, the poll did not offer respondents the option to choose to completely end all immigration.
However, the relatively low support for continuing the status quo, shows that a significant portion of all British voters were also hoping for the system to be reformed – suggesting that immigration was in fact an issue in both Leave and Remain camps.
Younger adults (20%) and Londoners (29%) were least likely to support restricting freedom of movement, with older, retired adults (46%) and those in Yorkshire & Humberside (45%), Wales (44%) and the South East (46%) preferring a points- based system. Those from AB social grades (65% vs 60% on average for the other social grades) and women (65% vs 57% men) were more likely to support tinkering with the current system, or keeping it the same, rather than scrapping freedom of movement.
Curiously, the unemployed were the most likely to support continuing the existing freedom of movement rules (33% of those not working and seeking work, compared to 8-11% of those retired on a state or private pension). This may reflect the reciprocal nature of the questions, with the unemployed more likely to feel constrained by a system whereby the EU would also limit inward migration from the UK based on skills levels.
Commenting on the findings, Demos’ Chief Executive Claudia Wood said:
“This polling shows how complex the Prime Minister’s task of managing the Brexit negotiations will be – within Europe, but also at home. Britons are very much divided on the best pathway forward. What’s surprising, is that when made to choose in a reciprocal context between three immigration scenarios likely to be on the table after Article 50 is triggered, a majority support maintaining some form of freedom of movement within the EU.”
“This unexpected result highlights that the public’s voice on our EU membership must not be extinguished after the Referendum vote; to repair some of the wounds laid bare, it’s clear there must also be an opportunity for input and deliberation ahead of the negotiations, so that we leave on terms that work for the British people.”
Media and Interview Requests:
Please contact Alexandra Porter at Demos, on 0207 367 4200 (07969 326069 out of hours) or email@example.com.
Notes to Editors:
The fieldwork for this poll was conducted by ComRes online between 10 and 11 August 2016, with a sample of 2,017 adults. Data was weighted to be representative of all adults in Great Britain. Full data tables can be found on the ComRes website, www.comresglobal.com. ComRes is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.
Respondents were asked: Q1. This next question is about the ongoing negotiations for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union. Which of the following types of agreement on free movement would you most like to see the UK introduce for citizens from the EU, if the same agreement was then introduced by other countries in the EU with regard to British citizens?
Answer options listed:
- Restrictions on the free movement of EU citizens to the UK, and UK citizens to EU countries
- Free movement to continue, but with restrictions on the ability of EU citizens in the UK, and UK citizens in EU countries to claim benefits for the first 4 years after arrival, and on the free movement of citizens with criminal records
Free movement of EU citizens to the UK, and UK citizens to EU countries to continue with no changes to the current system
To ensure balance during fieldwork, half of the respondents were shown the above statements with restrictions for UK citizens coming first in each statement, while the other half were shown the same statements but with restrictions for EU citizens coming first in each statement.
Demos is Britain’s leading cross-party think tank: an independent, educational charity, which produces original and innovative research. Visit: demos.co.uk
ComRes is a leading research consultancy specialising in corporate reputation, public policy and communications. Visit: www.comresglobal.com
Latest News from
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May