Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Department for International Development priorities questioned
MPs on the International Development Committee say field work overseas should be given greater priority and Ministers must explain UK spending on humanitarian projects more clearly
- Report: Department for International Development's Performance in 2012-13: the Departmental Annual Report 2012-13
- Report: Department for International Development's Performance in 2012-13: the Departmental Annual Report 2012-13 (PDF)
- Inquiry: Department for International Development's Performance in 2012-13: the Departmental Annual Report 2012-13
- International Development Committee
Launching its annual review of UK aid programmes and the administration of the Department for International Development (DFID), Sir Malcolm Bruce, Chair of the Committee said today:
“DFID staff should spend less time in their offices and more time out in the field building local knowledge and monitoring whether UK aid money is being used effectively.
We are also worried that the Department actually spends 40% of its budget in the last two months of the year, which raises questions about the smooth running of management and planning processes.
DFID must set out annually its provisional budget for humanitarian relief, what is held for contingencies for unpredictable events and how it will be deployed if not called upon.
We also call on the UK Government to press other countries to increase their spending on humanitarian crises as well as development. The UK has met the target of spending 0.7% of national income on aid; others should do the same.
UK spending on humanitarian assistance has risen substantially due partly to a very large increase in the aid budget for 2012-13. This will not, however, be repeated in future years as DFID’s budget will be linked to GDP. It will simply not be possible for DFID to continue taking the lead in future; other countries must do more.
DFID must not provide funds to support disasters in middle–income countries by raiding bilateral development programmes in low income countries. Rather, we argue for the percentage of income spent in low income countries to rise over time provided they are capable of absorbing it and of using aid effectively.”
In their Report the Committee also notes how—despite a small decline in 2012-13—the largest element (£1,075m) of DFID’s bilateral expenditure is money spent via multilateral organisations and private contractors. While MPs accept that DFID has put in place a number of changes to improve value for money provided by such organisations, the Committee also calls on DFID to monitor and report to them whether these changes have proved effective.
Linked to this the Committee cautions that DFID staff should have longer postings overseas (normally a minimum of four years) so that they can develop a deeper understanding of the culture and politics of the country they are working in and engage more effectively with the country’s politicians.
Commenting on this Sir Malcolm Bruce added:
“In evidence to our inquiry various contractors were critical of DFID’s programme management. We welcome changes DFID has put in place, but recommend going forward that policy advisers spend more time in the field and work more closely with programme managers in these partner organisations.
Moreover, while DFID has low administrative costs compared to other development organisations we do not regard this as a virtue if it arises from failure to do the job properly rather than from genuine efficiency savings. DFID must reassure itself and Parliament that it is not simply sub-contracting work which would be better done in-house.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government Response on Human Rights Protections in International Agreements published22/05/2019 16:25:00
The Human Rights Committee publishes the Government’s Response to its report on Human Rights Protections in International Agreements.
Many questions to be answered on future UK-EU transport connectivity22/05/2019 11:25:00
The EU Internal Market Sub-Committee publishes its report on the implications of Brexit for road, rail and maritime transport.
Loopholes in the draft legislation must be addressed, says Joint Committee21/05/2019 11:25:00
The Joint Committee on the Draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill yesterday published its pre-legislative scrutiny report.
Procedure Committee reviews “humble Address” procedure to demand papers20/05/2019 16:25:00
The Procedure Committee is today publishing recommendations on how the House of Commons should use its power to call for papers.
Lords Committee continues inquiry into EU fish discard legislation20/05/2019 13:47:00
The EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee takes evidence from the bodies responsible for enforcing fisheries legislation in England and Scotland.
UK Government must address poor living conditions and violence in Welsh prisons20/05/2019 11:15:00
The Welsh Affairs Committee presses for wide-ranging reforms to Welsh prisons, including improvements to healthcare, living conditions and probation services, and a process for tackling gang related violence, in its report on prison provision in Wales.
UK foreign policy report debated by Lords17/05/2019 16:25:00
On Tuesday 21 May the House of Lords debates the International Relations Committee's report, UK foreign policy in a shifting world order.
European Union Committee draws special attention to UK/Norway and Iceland trade agreeement16/05/2019 11:25:00
The European Union Committee has published its eleventh report on Brexit-related international agreements.