Design flaws in the Government’s fiscal framework and surplus target
In the latest issue of the National Institute Economic Review, NIESR Director Jonathan Portes examines the government’s fiscal plans for the 2015–20 Parliament and the economic issues raised by the new fiscal framework.
Portes finds that, while the slowdown in the pace of spending reductions is sensible and welcome, the new fiscal framework incorporates a number of significant design flaws. Achieving an overall budget surplus by 2019-20 appears plausible (if the OBR's and NIESR's central economic forecast materialise), although large spending reductions will be required.
However, if growth is significantly weaker than expected, then the surplus target will be far more difficult to meet. The proposed "get-out clause" - which would delay the target date - is poorly designed from both a theoretical and an empirical perspective. This brings its credibility into question.
Moreover, the government's case for the surplus target - the need to reduce debt sharply as "insurance" against a future recession - does not have a strong evidence base. The target is also likely to inhibit a needed increase in public investment, while potentially aggravating the long-standing problem of government manipulation of the fiscal aggregates to meet short-term targets.
One way to mitigate these concerns would be a significant expansion of the role of the OBR to ensure that long-run issues relating to fiscal sustainability and intergenerational equity do not suffer at the expense of short-term targets.
Notes for Editors:
This press release is based on an article entitled “The Government’s Fiscal Strategy”, written by Jonathan Portes, published in the National Institute Economic Review No. 233 August 2015.
This is a quarterly, peer reviewed, economic and social sciences journal. The fullReview is published from midnight on Wednesday 5 August.
For a copy of the article, or to organise an interview, please contact Brooke Hollingshead in the NIESR press office on 020 7654 1923 /email@example.com
To discuss the article please contact:
Jonathan Portes: firstname.lastname@example.org or 077 6644 1148
For further information:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
2 Dean Trench Street, Smith Square
London, SW1P 3HE
Switchboard Telephone Number: +44 (0) 207 222 7665, Website: http://www.niesr.ac.uk
Latest News from
Scrap energy price cap to prevent further bailouts, says IEA Analyst26/11/2021 10:35:00
Andy Mayer, Environment, Energy and Infrastructure Analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the £1.7bn taxpayer bailout of Bulb Energy
The King’s Fund responds to the Health and Care Bill workforce vote24/11/2021 16:25:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, commented on MPs voting against a plan to require the publication of health and care workforce projections
IFS - English universities ranked on their contributions to social mobility – and the least selective post-1992 universities come out on top24/11/2021 12:10:00
Universities are seen as crucial engines of social mobility, and perhaps with good reason. Individuals eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) in year 11 who attended university are almost four times more likely to be amongst the highest 20% of earners at age 30 than those who did not, and around ten times more likely if they attended one of the four most selective universities in the country.
Government spending on social care is “unsustainable”, says IEA economist24/11/2021 11:10:00
Professor Philip Booth, Senior Academic Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Health and Care Bill vote
IPPR - NHS migrant charging system ‘unfit for purpose’ as report reveals discrimination and risks to public health24/11/2021 10:10:00
An investigation by the IPPR think tank, into the operation and impacts of the NHS England system of charging people for healthcare who are not ‘ordinarily resident’ in the UK, has revealed that the system is ‘unfit for purpose’. Interviews with NHS staff have exposed a highly complex, costly system which incentivises racial profiling.
The King's Fund responds to the social care cap change vote This content relates to the following topics:24/11/2021 09:10:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, commented on MPs voting through a change to the social care cap
Prime Minister should take note of Lord Frost’s recommendations, says IEA Director General23/11/2021 16:20:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on Lord Frost’s speech