Disabled boy missed out on education and support because of poor council practice
A West Sussex boy missed out on vital support because the county council decided he had the ‘wrong’ type of disabilities, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has reported.
The boy, who has Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder did not have his social care needs met because the county council said it only supported children with Autism or severe learning disabilities.
The boy’s conditions mean he is prone to volatile outbursts; he can be aggressive at times and his behaviour is often unpredictable. He was excluded from school in February 2020, and although he has been provided with home tuition, he has been out of full-time education since.
The boy’s adoptive parents complained to the council because it refused to assess them for support for respite care, direct payments or a personal budget. The council said as the boy did not meet its strict criteria, he was not eligible.
During the Ombudsman’s investigation into the family’s complaint, the council started to provide six hours a week of respite care and reimbursed some of the care the family had previously paid for. He is due to start at a new specialist school in September.
The Ombudsman’s investigation found there was delay in finding a suitable school for the boy, which meant he has been without a suitable school for 16 months, and without full-time education for 13 months. The council also delayed providing alternative education to the boy for two months.
The council was also found to be at fault for not assessing the boy’s needs promptly when he was excluded from school. It took 23 weeks to assess his situation – and then only backdated its support by a month. The council also failed to carry out its own assessment of the appropriate level of respite care needed.
The council’s complaint handling was also criticised by the Ombudsman. It refused to allow the family to complain through all three stages of the Children’s Statutory Complaints Process, instead directing them to the Ombudsman after its Stage 1 investigation.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:
“I am concerned the council appears to be gatekeeping access to its services. By applying criteria to people requesting assessments for their children it is placing barriers in front of them.
“Throughout the time the boy was out of school, it appears the burden of finding a school placement has rested on the boy’s mother.
“The council has a duty to ensure there is sufficient educational provision available in its area to meet demand. The lack of suitable placements for the boy in the council’s SEN schools suggests it is not meeting this duty.
“I welcome that the council has agreed to my recommendations to improve its services and complaints handling.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has agreed to apologise to the family and pay them £1,250 for the gatekeeping of its assessment process and the delays this caused, along with the delays in its complaint handling and provision of respite care.
It will also reassess the current respite provided to the family and decide if this is appropriate, as well as pay them a further £1,800 for the boy’s missed education.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council has agreed to review its process for assessment to ensure it is meeting its duties for all children and not just those who fall under specific criteria.
The council will also complete an audit or review of the educational provision available in its area for children and young people who have SEND to ensure there are enough places to meet demand.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Ombudsman annual review highlights widening cracks in council complaints systems28/07/2021 11:15:00
The ‘widening cracks’ in local government complaint handling are being highlighted in the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s annual review of complaints 2020-2021, published today.
Council to look again at summer-born children’s school start date requests26/07/2021 09:15:00
Leeds City Council failed to follow guidance on summer-born admissions when deciding when an August-born girl could start school, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman raps council for taking too long to change care home charging policy16/07/2021 14:15:00
A Lincolnshire family has been forced to complain to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for the second time about the way a relative’s care home fees were charged because the county council failed to improve its policies quickly enough.
London council to revise its social care charging policy following Ombudsman’s investigation15/07/2021 14:38:00
London Borough of Bexley has agreed to revise its social care charging policy after a man complained to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman about the way the authority increased its costs.
City of Wolverhampton Council to improve its adoption recruitment process08/07/2021 11:25:00
Wolverhampton council has agreed to ensure its adoption recruitment procedure adheres to statutory guidance, following an Ombudsman investigation.
Camden’s poor complaint response prompts further Ombudsman investigation01/07/2021 14:05:00
London Borough of Camden failed to carry out a recommendation to apologise to a man for its poor handling of a complaint, until the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman chased it for a response.
Birmingham to review school transport for children and young people following Ombudsman investigation25/06/2021 12:10:00
Birmingham City Council has agreed to revise its home to school transport policy and review all its decisions to issue a travel pass over the past three years following several complaints to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.