EC welcomes General Court judgment confirming its inspection powers in the area of electronic searches
The European Commission welcomes the judgment of the EU General Court (case T-272/12), dismissing an appeal by Energetický a průmyslový holding (EPH) and its subsidiary EP Investment Advisors (EPIA) against a €2.5 million fine the Commission imposed on them in 2012. EPH and EPIA were fined for obstructing a Commission inspection in an antitrust investigation, by failing to block an email account and diverting incoming emails. The judgment sends a clear message to companies that any steps that undermine the integrity and effectiveness of inspections, including tampering with data stored electronically, are illegal and will be sanctioned.
The Court confirmed that the Commission was right to consider both the failure to block an e-mail account and the diversion of incoming emails as serious breaches of EPH and EPIA's obligation to cooperate with the Commission during the inspection. In line with previous case law (cases T-141/08and C-89/11P), the Court held that these two incidents constitute an obstruction in themselves; the Commission does not need to show that any document was actually removed or manipulated.
The Commission welcomes the Court's findings, because obstructions of inspections can severely undermine competition enforcement. The judgment makes clear that the Commission is entitled to impose appropriate and deterrent sanctions for companies' conduct that may result in destroying evidence of antitrust infringements, irrespective of whether it is stored in paper or electronic form.
Inspections are one of the Commission's most important investigative tools to detect infringements of EU antitrust rules. Commission inspectors may examine and take copies of documents related to the business, irrespective of the form in which they are stored. Business documents are nowadays largely stored in electronic files. In order to avoid any destruction of electronic files, inspectors routinely take steps ensuring them access to the complete files during an inspection.
In particular inspectors identify the e-mail accounts of key persons in a company under inspection and block access to these e-mail accounts during the inspection as one of the measures to prevent the destruction of content. The Commission needs to review not only emails that pre-date the inspection but also emails that are exchanged in the course of the inspection.
Article 23(1)(c) of the antitrust Regulation 1/2003 provides that the Commission can impose a fine of up to 1% of a company's total turnover if the company, intentionally or negligently, produces the required books or other records related to the business in incomplete form during an inspection or refuses to submit to an inspection.
This is not the first time the Commission has sanctioned a company under antitrust Regulation 1/2003 for obstructing inspections. In 2008, the Commission fined E.ON €38 million for the breach of a seal during an inspection. The Commission's decision was confirmed by the General Court in 2010and subsequently by the Court of Justice in 2012.
General public inquiries:
Latest News from
Future-proofing the European banking market – removing the obstacles to exit21/11/2019 15:10:00
Speech by Yves Mersch, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB, at the S&P Global’s European Financial Institutions Conference, Paris
Autumn Fiscal Package: EC adopts Opinions on euro area Draft Budgetary Plans21/11/2019 13:20:00
The EC has presented its Opinions on euro area Member States' 2020 Draft Budgetary Plans, taken steps under the Stability and Growth Pact and adopted the fourth Enhanced Surveillance Report for Greece.
Raw materials: EC launches new online portal to support responsible sourcing in businesses21/11/2019 11:10:00
The EC has launched Due Diligence Ready!, an online portal that provides businesses with guidance on how to check the sources of the metals and minerals entering their supply chains – the so-called “due diligence” process.
More than half a million asylum applications lodged in the EU+ so far in 201921/11/2019 10:02:00
The proportion of applications receiving a positive decision (known as "recognition rate") so far this year was 34%, compared to 33% in the first nine months of 2018.
EU and the Paris agreement: towards climate neutrality20/11/2019 15:10:00
The EU will need to update its long-term climate goals in 2020. Parliament wants more ambitious goals, but will EU countries agree to aim for climate neutrality by 2050?
Oceans and seas threatened by climate change: Council adopts conclusions20/11/2019 13:20:00
The Council Hs adopted conclusions on oceans and seas, stressing that climate change is a direct and existential threat to life in oceans and seas globally.
Textiles EU's fourth largest cause of environmental pressures after food, housing, transport20/11/2019 12:10:00
Consumption of clothing, footwear and household textiles in the EU uses annually about 1.3 tonnes of raw materials and more than 100 cubic metres of water per person, according to a European Environment Agency briefing.
Chambers & Regions said a collective effort is needed to boost uptake of EU FTAs20/11/2019 11:25:00
EUROCHAMBRES and the European Committee of the Regions have conducted the joint survey over the past months, with an objective to identify opportunities and obstacles faced in the implementation of EU FTAs.
Rapid risk assessment - Sexual transmission of dengue in Spain20/11/2019 09:10:00
Spanish authorities have reported the likely sexual transmission of dengue between two men. This is the first case of dengue described in an area without the presence of vector mosquitoes that has been attributed to sexual transmission, and the first sexual transmission described between men who have sex with men (MSM).
Young migrants: Is Europe creating a lost generation?19/11/2019 16:10:00
Delays and serious challenges integrating young refugees who have fled war and persecution risk creating a lost generation, finds a new Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) report. While it identifies some good practices, it urges Member States to learn from each other to give these young people an adequate chance in life.