Financial Conduct Authority
FCA and PRA publish Decision Notices given to former CEO who paid excessive remuneration to his wife to reduce his tax liability
The Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’) have decided to ban and fine Stuart Malcolm Forsyth, the former CEO of a small mutual insurer, £78,318 and £76,180 respectively. The regulators’ respective decision-making committees found, following a joint investigation, that between February 2010 and July 2016 Mr Forsyth transferred excessive amounts of his own remuneration to his wife to reduce his own tax liability and took steps to conceal that arrangement.
Mr Forsyth has referred the Decision Notices to the Upper Tribunal where the parties will present their respective cases. Any findings in the Decision Notices are therefore provisional and reflect the FCA’s and PRA’s respective findings as to what occurred and how they consider Mr Forsyth’s behaviour should be characterised.
The Upper Tribunal will determine what, if any, is the appropriate action for the FCA and the PRA to take, and will remit the matter to the FCA and PRA with such directions as the Upper Tribunal considers appropriate to give effect to its determination. The Upper Tribunal's decision will be made public on its website. Accordingly, the proposed actions outlined in the Decision Notices will have no effect pending the determination of the case by the Tribunal.
The FCA Decision Notice, which reflects the FCA’s view of what occurred, outlines the reasons for the FCA’s decision to ban Mr Forsyth and fine him £78,318 for lacking integrity.
As CEO of Scottish Boatowners Mutual Insurance Association (‘SBMIA’), Mr Forsyth paid his wife a proportion of his own salary in compensation for providing some out of hours administrative support and occasional hospitality at home. Up until 2010, Mrs Forsyth was paid between £5,000 and approximately £10,000 per annum, which was not obviously unreasonable for the work she was undertaking.
From 2010, Mr Forsyth transferred increasing amounts of his salary, and in most years all or part of his own bonus, to Mrs Forsyth in order to reduce his tax liability. Between 2010 and 2016, Mr Forsyth transferred just over £200,000 of his pay to Mrs Forsyth, and by the 2015/16 tax year, Mrs Forsyth’s remuneration was just over £52,000, more than any other SBMIA employee save Mr Forsyth. As a result of these arrangements, Mr Forsyth paid approximately £18,000 less in income tax than he should have done.
SBMIA’s Board and Remuneration Committee were aware that Mr Forsyth paid a proportion of his salary to Mrs Forsyth but were not aware how much Mrs Forsyth was paid. Mr Forsyth concealed the level of payments from SBMIA’s Board and others. In particular:
Mr Forsyth created false minutes to give the misleading impression that SBMIA’s Remuneration Committee had agreed the salaries of both Mr and Mrs Forsyth in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In fact, it had only agreed Mr Forsyth’s salary.
In late 2015, after internal concerns were raised about Mrs Forsyth’s remuneration, Mr Forsyth inappropriately involved himself in a subsequent investigation by an external auditor.
In 2016, Mr Forsyth responded recklessly to an information request from the PRA by sending it the false Remuneration Committee minutes.
Mr Forsyth did not believe that his actions were permissible. He was aware that Mrs Forsyth only carried out a limited amount of administrative work and that the amount of her remuneration for that work was unjustified. By deliberately arranging these payments to Mrs Forsyth, Mr Forsyth acted without integrity to his financial benefit.
Notes to Editors
- The FCA’s Decision Notice for Mr Forsyth was issued on 30 September 2019. The PRA issued a Decision Notice to Mr Forsyth on the same day. The decisions were made by the FCA’s Regulatory Decisions Committee (‘RDC’) and the PRA’s Enforcement Decision Making Committee (‘EDMC’) following a joint investigation. This was the first jointly contested case before the RDC and EDMC. Mr Forsyth referred the matter to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Division) on 25 October 2019.
- The FCA has an overarching strategic objective of ensuring the relevant markets function well. To support this it has three operational objectives: to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system; and to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers.
- Find out more information about the FCA.
- Find out more information about the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chambers)(link is external).
Latest News from
Financial Conduct Authority
High Court orders illegal pension introducers Avacade, Alexandra Associates and their directors to pay £10,715,000 restitution to consumers11/08/2020 14:10:00
The two companies and three individuals must pay restitution to members of the public who were induced to transfer their pensions into self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs).
FCA highlights concerns when credit firms allow repeat borrowing07/08/2020 12:25:00
The FCA yesterday published the findings of a review into relending by firms that offer high-cost credit.
FCA consults on new rules to improve open-ended property fund structures04/08/2020 12:25:00
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is consulting on proposals to reduce the potential for harm to investors from the liquidity mismatch in open-ended property funds.
New guidance to help firms do more for vulnerable consumers30/07/2020 16:20:00
The FCA has set out new best practice guidance for firms to do more to protect vulnerable consumers.
FCA to ban motor finance discretionary commission models29/07/2020 13:38:00
The FCA yesterday confirmed it will introduce a ban on discretionary commission models. This followed a consultation in October 2019.
FCA launches enhanced Financial Services Register to protect consumers28/07/2020 14:10:00
The FCA yesterday launched its updated Financial Services (FS) Register – including a simpler design and clearer language.
FCA seeks views on extending the implementation deadlines for the Certification Regime and Conduct Rules20/07/2020 12:25:00
The FCA recently (17 July 2020) published a consultation paper on making changes to its rules following the extension to the deadline by which FCA solo-regulated firms need to have implemented the Certification Regime.
FCA and City Corporation collaborate to help innovative companies drive recovery from coronavirus17/07/2020 12:25:00
The FCA and the City of London Corporation will collaborate on the pilot of a ‘digital sandbox’ to support innovative firms tackling challenges caused by the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic.
FCA provides guidance to firms on maintaining access to cash for customers16/07/2020 15:38:00
The FCA has today published draft guidance for firms setting out its expectations for banks, building societies and credit unions when they are considering closing branches or ATMs, or converting a free to use ATM to pay to use.