Financial Conduct Authority
FCA fines Deutsche Bank £163 million for serious anti-money laundering controls failings
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has yesterday fined Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank) £163,076,224 for failing to maintain an adequate anti-money laundering (AML) control framework during the period between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2015. This is the largest financial penalty for AML controls failings ever imposed by the FCA, or its predecessor the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
Deutsche Bank exposed the UK financial system to the risks of financial crime by failing to properly oversee the formation of new customer relationships and the booking of global business in the UK. As a consequence of its inadequate AML control framework, Deutsche Bank was used by unidentified customers to transfer approximately $10 billion, of unknown origin, from Russia to offshore bank accounts in a manner that is highly suggestive of financial crime.
Mark Steward, Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, yesterday said:
“Financial crime is a risk to the UK financial system. Deutsche Bank was obliged to establish and maintain an effective AML control framework. By failing to do so, Deutsche Bank put itself at risk of being used to facilitate financial crime and exposed the UK to the risk of financial crime.”
“The size of the fine reflects the seriousness of Deutsche Bank’s failings. We have repeatedly told firms how to comply with our AML requirements and the failings of Deutsche Bank are simply unacceptable. Other firms should take notice of today’s fine and look again at their own AML procedures to ensure they do not face similar action.”
The FCA found significant deficiencies throughout Deutsche Bank’s AML control framework. The FCA specifically found that, during the relevant period, Deutsche Bank’s Corporate Banking and Securities division (CB&S) in the UK:
- performed inadequate customer due diligence
- failed to ensure that its front office took responsibility for the CB&S division’s Know Your Customer obligations
- used flawed customer and country risk rating methodologies
- had deficient AML policies and procedures
- had an inadequate AML IT infrastructure
- lacked automated AML systems for detecting suspicious trades
- failed to provide adequate oversight of trades booked in the UK by traders in non-UK jurisdictions
As a result of these failings Deutsche Bank failed to obtain sufficient information about its customers to inform the risk assessment process and to provide a basis for transaction monitoring. The failings allowed the front office of Deutsche Bank’s Russia-based subsidiary (DB Moscow) to execute more than 2,400 pairs of trades that mirrored each other (mirror trades) between April 2012 and October 2014.
The mirror trades were used by customers of Deutsche Bank and DB Moscow to transfer more than $6 billion from Russia, through Deutsche Bank in the UK, to overseas bank accounts, including in Cyprus, Estonia, and Latvia. The orders for both sides of the mirror trades were received by DB Moscow, which executed both sides at the same time.
The customers on the Moscow and London sides of the mirror trades were connected to each other and the volume and value of the securities was the same on both sides. The purpose of the mirror trades was the conversion of Roubles into US Dollars and the covert transfer of those funds out of Russia, which is highly suggestive of financial crime.
A further $3.8 billion in suspicious “one-sided trades” also occurred. The FCA believes that some, if not all, of an additional 3,400 trades formed one side of mirror trades and were often conducted by the same customers involved in the mirror trading.
As a result, Deutsche Bank breached Principle 3 (taking reasonable steps to organise its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems) of the FCA’s Principles for Businesses. In addition, Deutsche Bank also breached Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC) rules 6.1.1 R and 6.3.1 R.
The FCA emphasises the importance of having a strong AML control framework through its proactive supervisory programmes on AML. Firms are regularly reminded of the importance of safeguarding the UK financial system from financial crime and how to comply with AML requirements.
Deutsche Bank agreed to settle at an early stage of the FCA’s investigation and therefore qualified for a 30% (stage 1) discount. This discount does not apply to the £9.1 million in commission that Deutsche Bank generated from the suspicious trading, which has been disgorged as part of the overall penalty meaning that the firm has received no financial benefit from the breach. Were it not for the 30% discount the financial penalty would have been £229,076,224.
Deutsche Bank was exceptionally cooperative with the FCA during this investigation and has committed significant resources to a large scale remediation programme to correct the deficiencies in its AML control framework and customer files.
Notes to editors
- The Final Notice for Deutsche Bank.
- In 2007, the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) guidance was issued to accompany the Money Laundering Regulations 2007. This guidance reiterated firms’ obligations to have effective procedures in place to detect and prevent money laundering. The JMLSG guidance is updated from time to time, and it was last updated in November 2014.
- On 1 April 2013, the FCA became responsible for the conduct supervision of all regulated financial firms and the prudential supervision of those not supervised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
- The FCA has an overarching strategic objective of ensuring the relevant markets function well. To support this it has three operational objectives: to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system; and to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers.
- Find out more information about the FCA.
Latest News from
Financial Conduct Authority
Upper Tribunal upholds the Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to fine and ban Charles Palmer former CEO of adviser network10/08/2017 11:10:00
On 8 August 2017, the Upper Tribunal upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) decision to ban Charles Palmer, former CEO of Financial Limited and Investments Limited (“the Firms”), from performing FCA significant influence functions.
The FCA and the FCA Practitioner Panel publish the findings from their joint survey of industry views04/08/2017 10:25:00
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the FCA Practitioner Panel yesterday published the findings from their 2017 survey of FCA-regulated firms.
Financial Conduct Authority sets out agenda and priorities for consumer credit01/08/2017 09:10:00
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) yesterday published the outcome of its review into high-cost credit, which includes its assessment of the effectiveness of the payday loan price cap.
Lloyds Banking Group sets up redress scheme for mortgage arrears customers28/07/2017 09:10:00
Lloyds Banking Group (Lloyds) has agreed to set up a redress scheme for mortgage customers who incurred fees after they fell behind with their mortgage payments.