Forging ahead with crude reductions to non-EU immigration would be a risk to Britain’s economy – IPPR
IPPR argues that:
- The government should take a strategic view of our immigration system to protect our economy in an uncertain post-Brexit landscape. The first step to do this is to break down the net migration targets into its component parts – including workers, family migrants, and refugees – in order to develop a nuanced immigration system that meets our economic needs and responds to public concerns;
- International students are a major economic asset to the UK and a vital part of our education exports. Students of all abilities pay fees and contribute to our economy, so there is a weak case for distinguishing students on the basis of academic ability within our immigration system. The government has in the past said it wants to welcome international students to the UK and the public support this aim; so it is vital that it now sends out the right message to ensure that we remain an open, attractive place for students across the globe;
- It is right that the government invests in upskilling the UK workforce to meet our long-term economic needs. But this cannot simply operate as a substitute for migrant labour – many migrants coming through the skilled worker route bring unique skills to our labour market that complement British workers and boost productivity;
- The International Passenger Survey, which is the basis of the government’s net migration target, is not reliable enough to alone guide policy. This is particularly the case for student migration, where our research has found wide disparities between different data sources on how many international students stay in the UK after completing their studies. The government should include within its review an investigation of the underlying data sources for each of these visa routes.
On the announcement of a Controlling Migration Fund: IPPR has long advocated a fund targeted at areas under particular strain from migration. However such a fund should be targeted not just at areas of high migration, as the Home Secretary announced, but at areas where increases have been most abrupt. It is also vital the government quickly explain how it will be funded.
Phoebe Griffith, IPPR Associate Director for Migration, Integration and Communities, responding to the speech by Amber Rudd at the Conservative Party Conference, said:
“It is vital that, in the wake of the Brexit vote, the government takes a smart, strategic approach to our migration system, so it is right that the government takes a careful review of our student and work routes.
“But forging ahead with crude reductions in numbers would be a serious risk to our economy. International students are a core part of our education exports and there is broad public support for keeping numbers at the current level.
“Moreover, the underlying data that suggests they make up a large part of net migration is dubious. If the government decides to take a tough line on students, it would harm our economy and damage our relations with trade partners abroad, such as India and China – and all on the basis of figures that could simply be wrong.”
Kieren Walters 07921 403651 firstname.lastname@example.org
- IPPRs recent report Destination Education looked in detail at the issue of international student migration and the limits to current government policy. More information can be found here: http://www.ippr.org/news-and-media/press-releases/government-could-be-targeting-phantom-students
- IPPR aims to influence policy in the present and reinvent progressive politics in the future, and is dedicated to the better country that Britain can be through progressive policy and politics. With nearly 60 staff across four offices throughout the UK, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence.
Our independent research is wide ranging, it covers the economy, work, skills, transport, democracy, the environment, education, energy, migration and healthcare among many other areas.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May
Half of Conservative manifesto pledges yet to be delivered – new IfG analysis11/05/2021 12:35:00
The government is yet to deliver around half of its 2019 manifesto promises – and many of those it has made progress on are the ‘easy wins’, according to new analysis by the Institute for Government following the local election results.
IPPR - Threat to end of life care services as deaths expected to reach pandemic levels every year from 2031 onwards11/05/2021 11:35:00
Report warns of ‘eternal 2020’ for end of life care services without expansion of services
IFS - Government should nudge people to save more into a pension when children leave home, mortgages are paid off or student loans come to an end11/05/2021 10:35:00
Contrary to the common message that retirement saving should start young, there are good reasons why the proportion of earnings set aside for retirement should increase substantially through working life for many people. Many employees experience earnings growth over their lifetimes, and would therefore prefer to save more at older ages when earnings are higher. Parents would also be expected to save more for retirement after their children have left home and expenses are lower.
Attempts to eliminate online harms could do “great damage,” says new IEA research11/05/2021 09:35:00
New research paper from the Institute of Economic Affairs warns of unintended consequences from regulating online content
Healthy meals, healthy planet – IPPR calls for food system shake up to fight climate crisis and food poverty07/05/2021 11:25:00
Think tank calls for expansion of free school meals, healthy food voucher scheme and end to environmentally harmful foods
King's Fund - New analysis shows ‘widespread decline’ in adult social care06/05/2021 15:05:00
New figures reveal the dire state of England's social care sector before the pandemic, with more people requesting support but fewer getting the help they needed. The data puts further pressure on the government to commit to reform of social care in next week’s Queen’s Speech.