Foster carers left out of pocket when child moved schools
Gateshead council will apologise to a couple after it insisted they bear the costs of taking their disabled foster child to a special school agreed by the council, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has said.
The Ombudsman found the council wrong not to provide free school transport for the boy, who has multiple disabilities and complex needs, when it agreed he should attend a new school 17 miles away.
This meant the foster carers were significantly out of pocket, and drove nearly 70 miles a day to and from the school.
The council believed the independent fostering agency, which it employed the couple through, should have covered the transport costs. This was despite the council naming the school in the boy’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan, for which government guidance says financial responsibility rests with the council.
To avoid the same thing happening to others, the council has agreed to review its policies in this area. It will also ensure the foster carers in this case are reimbursed for the costs they’ve outlaid.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“I welcome Gateshead council’s willingness to learn from this case, and implement our recommendations to review its practice in this area. While it is unfortunate the family had to pursue their case all the way to us, I’m pleased to provide some resolution for them and see these problems finally put right.
“The family had been doubly penalised in this case. Not only did they have to meet the additional costs of transport, but they were worse off than other carers looking after children with similar needs that could attend schools nearer their home. Ultimately they had to pay for considerable transport costs out of the money they received for his other needs.”
The couple had been looking after the boy since 2012. The council has a full care order, meaning it makes all significant decisions for the boy, including where he goes to school. Until July 2016 he had been attending a school closer to the couple’s home, and the council had been providing a taxi. The carers identified a school further away which they thought would better suit his needs.
The council issued a new EHC Plan identifying the school. But it then told the couple it would not pay the transport costs, saying they should come out of the money it paid the couple’s agency.
The Ombudsman’s report found the council should have considered the consequences of moving the boy to the new school, and properly explained the implication to the foster carers before the move was arranged. There was no evidence this happened.
The Ombudsman also found the council did not examine the terms of the contract it had with the fostering agency to ensure the additional transport costs were not passed onto the foster carers.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services.
As well as apologising to the couple and ensuring they are not out of pocket for transporting the boy from 2016, the council has agreed to pay them £500 to recognise the distress and inconvenience caused. It will pay a further £250 to recognise the avoidable time and trouble bringing the complaint to the Ombudsman.
It will now also take responsibility for arranging transport or covering the additional costs incurred by taking the boy to school.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve a council’s processes for the wider public. In this case the council will undertake a comprehensive review of its policies regarding free home to school transport for looked after children in which they contract independent fostering providers.
It will also clarify its expectations with the agency on how costs are met for school transport, rather than passed on to the foster carer, and ensure this is clear in its contracts and tendering details.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Norfolk council failed two boys with Special Educational Needs17/01/2019 09:15:00
Norfolk County Council’s provision for children with special educational needs (SEN) has been criticised in two separate investigations after the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman revealed it had already upheld nine similar complaints.
Ombudsman welcomes National Audit Office report15/01/2019 16:25:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has today welcomed the National Audit Office's (NAO) report on local authority governance.
Carers leave woman in pain after burns not detected soon enough10/01/2019 09:15:00
A vulnerable Blackpool woman was left “screaming in pain” with serious burns on her leg after carers left her too close to a hot radiator, a Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman investigation has found.
Ombudsman issues rare finding about Wandsworth independent care provider09/01/2019 12:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has issued a rare public notice against a Wandsworth care provider for not acting appropriately when dealing with a complaint.
Complaints to the Ombudsman about the communication of changes in the state pension age for women20/12/2018 16:15:00
On 8 October, we issued a proposal to investigate a sample of complaints about the communication of changes in the state pension age for women and associated issues.
Failure of Care Quality Commission to make sure NHS employs ‘fit and proper’ directors20/12/2018 12:15:00
A Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman report published yesterday revealed significant weaknesses in the way the Care Quality Commission (CQC) used the NHS ‘fit and proper’ person test.
Elderly man with Alzheimer’s disease died when agency failed to provide night care19/12/2018 09:15:15
An elderly man with Alzheimer’s disease died following a fall from bed when an agency night carer failed to attend his home.