Foster carers left out of pocket when child moved schools
Gateshead council will apologise to a couple after it insisted they bear the costs of taking their disabled foster child to a special school agreed by the council, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has said.
The Ombudsman found the council wrong not to provide free school transport for the boy, who has multiple disabilities and complex needs, when it agreed he should attend a new school 17 miles away.
This meant the foster carers were significantly out of pocket, and drove nearly 70 miles a day to and from the school.
The council believed the independent fostering agency, which it employed the couple through, should have covered the transport costs. This was despite the council naming the school in the boy’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan, for which government guidance says financial responsibility rests with the council.
To avoid the same thing happening to others, the council has agreed to review its policies in this area. It will also ensure the foster carers in this case are reimbursed for the costs they’ve outlaid.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“I welcome Gateshead council’s willingness to learn from this case, and implement our recommendations to review its practice in this area. While it is unfortunate the family had to pursue their case all the way to us, I’m pleased to provide some resolution for them and see these problems finally put right.
“The family had been doubly penalised in this case. Not only did they have to meet the additional costs of transport, but they were worse off than other carers looking after children with similar needs that could attend schools nearer their home. Ultimately they had to pay for considerable transport costs out of the money they received for his other needs.”
The couple had been looking after the boy since 2012. The council has a full care order, meaning it makes all significant decisions for the boy, including where he goes to school. Until July 2016 he had been attending a school closer to the couple’s home, and the council had been providing a taxi. The carers identified a school further away which they thought would better suit his needs.
The council issued a new EHC Plan identifying the school. But it then told the couple it would not pay the transport costs, saying they should come out of the money it paid the couple’s agency.
The Ombudsman’s report found the council should have considered the consequences of moving the boy to the new school, and properly explained the implication to the foster carers before the move was arranged. There was no evidence this happened.
The Ombudsman also found the council did not examine the terms of the contract it had with the fostering agency to ensure the additional transport costs were not passed onto the foster carers.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services.
As well as apologising to the couple and ensuring they are not out of pocket for transporting the boy from 2016, the council has agreed to pay them £500 to recognise the distress and inconvenience caused. It will pay a further £250 to recognise the avoidable time and trouble bringing the complaint to the Ombudsman.
It will now also take responsibility for arranging transport or covering the additional costs incurred by taking the boy to school.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve a council’s processes for the wider public. In this case the council will undertake a comprehensive review of its policies regarding free home to school transport for looked after children in which they contract independent fostering providers.
It will also clarify its expectations with the agency on how costs are met for school transport, rather than passed on to the foster carer, and ensure this is clear in its contracts and tendering details.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Medway Council criticised for not reviewing school transport policy properly16/05/2019 16:10:00
Medway Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for failing to review its home to school transport policy following an earlier complaint.
Vulnerable man put at risk because of safeguarding failings by Wirral council10/05/2019 14:15:00
A vulnerable man remained at risk from poor care for more than 18 months, despite Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council being alerted to problems, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Maidstone council tried to charge for reviewing housing application decisions09/05/2019 14:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has uncovered an unusual charging policy during an investigation into a housing complaint about Maidstone Borough Council.
Ombudsman responds to new Ministry guidance for councils08/05/2019 13:38:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has welcomed the publication of new guidance for councils on scrutiny by the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Lancashire County Council criticised for failing to support vulnerable children properly03/05/2019 09:15:00
Lancashire County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for not providing the right support for two vulnerable siblings when they moved to live with their aunt and uncle.
City council to review transport policy for adults with special educational needs following Ombudsman investigation02/05/2019 14:15:00
A Birmingham mother had to drive five hours a day to take her adult son, who had ‘severe and critical needs’, to his specialist college, because Birmingham City Council did not provide him with transport, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Cornwall Council takes more than a decade to decide village green application26/04/2019 11:15:00
Cornwall Council has taken more than 11 years to determine a man’s village green application, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Mother of murder victim failed by probation provider, Ombudsman finds25/04/2019 15:38:00
A grieving family was let down by Dorset, Devon & Cornwall Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) due to a number of failings after the tragic murder of their son and brother Adrian Munday, an investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has found.