Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government increases its ambition on water quality after decades of inaction
The Government and the water industry regulator Ofwat accept that the next water industry price review process has needed to prioritise long term investment in the sewerage network, to take better account for natural capital and to increase the use of nature-based solutions. This paves the way for a major upgrade of England’s overloaded Victorian sewerage infrastructure.
- Read the Government Response
- Read the Report: Water Quality in Rivers
- Inquiry: Water Quality in Rivers
- Environmental Audit Committee
The Government says that it is committed to improving monitoring of water quality, through measures introduced to the Environment Act. Ministers support industry-funded research to understand better the chemical cocktail coursing through waterways as a critical pre-cursor to cleaning up our rivers.
Following widespread criticism from members of the public, campaigners and parliamentarians, water companies have now committed to improve transparency around the industry’s use of storm overflows. Improved overflow monitoring is essential to transforming understanding the frequency and nature of discharges of sewage from combined sewer overflows. The EAC recommended better analysis of Event Duration Monitoring (EDM) data to identify where discharges are likely to breach permit conditions. The Environment Agency is taking this work forward, and the Government says it will consider how to communicate this effectively to the public.
The EAC recommendation to Government to require industry to install volume monitors as well, so as to gauge the amount of untreated or partially treated sewage being discharged, was rejected by Ministers.
The EAC report concluded that improved enforcement was crucial to deter unpermitted sewage discharges. Following EAC’s recommendations, the Environment Agency is reviewing how it audits the self-monitoring of wastewater treatment works by water companies.
The Environment Agency (EA) also plays a significant role in enforcement. The Committee welcomes the increased funding being provided to the EA for enforcement, but is concerned that the extra inspectors for which funding has been provided may not have sufficient powers to enforce action against permit breaches, and that the additional posts fall short of what is required in terms of site visits. EAC has noted previous EA statements about its policy on following up reports of Category 3 (lower impact pollution) incidents.
EAC is concerned that the Government has rejected its recommendations around agricultural pollution, despite figures showing that diffuse pollution from agricultural sources prevents 40% of rivers and other water bodies from achieving good ecological status. The response reveals Government concerns that nutrient neutrality policies could stall housebuilding, which the EAC recognises is a potentially conflicting priority where a balance needs to be struck. Urgent work is required by Natural England to find a framework for local authorities to be able to provide clarity of the mitigation measures necessary for developers to build without exacerbating risks to river pollution.
Ministers have also rejected the EAC’s call for a presumption against planning permission for new intensive livestock units in areas that are suffering from excessive nutrient pollution, such as in the Wye Valley.
Other sources of water pollution
EAC looks forward to the Ministerial responses to the Government consultations on fats, oils and greases, and on wet wipes and other sanitary products.
Despite the impact that shedding microplastics from clothing has on the environment, which EAC has previously highlighted, the Committee is disappointed that the Government has rejected its recommendation to including voluntary targets to reduce microplastic pollution from textiles in its Textiles 2030 clothing sustainability scheme.
Environmental Audit Committee Chairman, Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP, said:
“Improving water quality in our rivers is not an easy task and will not be solved overnight. In 2021, sewage poured into our waterways over 370,000 times: this is simply unacceptable. But the Government has clearly been listening and Ministers have shown a determination to engage constructively with the Committee’s recommendations.
“The Government response to our report is broadly positive, and I welcome moves to improve significantly the amount and analysis of monitoring, to hold water companies to account and better understand the dangerous chemical cocktail coursing through our waterways. Enforcement of permit conditions is crucial, and the Committee will in due course be examining the capacity of the relevant agencies to deliver effective environmental protection in this area. I look forward to evaluating the further action on effective monitoring of sewage discharges promised at the next update of the Government’s 25 Year Environment Plan.
“We welcome the increased focus by Ministers on prioritising water quality improvement through guidance to Ofwat in its Strategic Policy Statement, the recent consultation on water quality targets and sewage overflow measures and the latest iterations of WINEP and WISER guidance to inform the environmental improvements water companies are required to deliver in the next price review period.
“This is a critical period for transforming human impact on our waterways and I welcome the way in which the Government is engaging and seeking to put right the indifference of successive previous administrations. The Committee will continue to hold the Government, its arms-length bodies and the water companies to account as they implement these plans to improve the water quality in England’s rivers.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
MPs propose amendments to Online Safety Bill to ensure Ofcom independence04/07/2022 15:33:00
The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has put forward amendments to the Government’s proposed online safety legislation.
Committee publishes Procedural Protocol to accompany MPs Code of Conduct and final proposals for Guide to the Rules04/07/2022 11:38:00
The Committee on Standards publishes its proposed Procedural Protocol – bringing together in a single document all the processes for how breaches of the MPs’ Code of Conduct are dealt with.
International Trade Committee statement on Secretary of State session cancellation01/07/2022 15:33:00
International Trade Committee statement given yesterday on Secretary of State session cancellation.
Lords Committee requests urgent review of the Life in the UK Test01/07/2022 13:33:00
The Justice and Home Affairs Committee yesterday published a letter to Home Office Minister, Kevin Foster MP, stressing the need for the Government to begin immediately a review of the Life in the UK Test.
Committee calls on Government to delay ratification of Australia deal30/06/2022 11:25:00
The International Trade Committee calls on the Government to delay the ratification of the UK’s trade deal with Australia to enable additional scrutiny of the agreement.
Culture change needed at the Ministry of Defence to ensure SMEs in Scotland receive a fair share of defence contracts24/06/2022 15:33:00
The Scottish Affairs Committee today, on the eve of Armed Forces Day, argues that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Scotland are being overlooked by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and its prime contractors when they select companies to fulfil defence contracts.
UK-Australia free trade agreement welcomed, but a published trade policy is needed23/06/2022 12:10:00
As the first trade deal negotiated from scratch following the UK’s departure from the EU, the UK-Australia free trade agreement (FTA) provides an insight into the UK Government’s vision for trade after Brexit. It is regrettable that it cannot be placed in the context of a published trade policy and understood in relation to other policy priorities, for example on climate, according to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee.