Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Government must act now to reduce EU penalties
The Public Accounts Committee report concludes Governmentdepartments have moved too slowly to reduce penalties incurred to the European Commission.
- Report: Financial management of the European Union budget in 2014
- Report: Financial management of the European Union budget in 2014 (PDF 340KB)
- Inquiry: Memorandum on Financial Management in the EU
- Public Accounts Committee
Over the last decade, the UK government has incurred at least £650 million in such penalties because of errors in how public bodies have spent European Union funds—the sixth-highest level of 'disallowance' in the EU as a proportion of funding received by the Commission.
The Committee finds departments "only seem to have woken up to this problem recently" and calls on the Treasury to take the lead in addressing urgently the causes and levels of penalties incurred.
The Committee says: "By the end of 2016 we expect departments to have spelt out what actions they will take to reduce penalties. If necessary, a task force should be established to ensure that the action needed is delivered."
UK departments add complexity to EU programmes
The Committee highlights the problem of UK departments contributing "additional complexity" to the implementation of EU programmes, driving up error rates.
Too little is being done to learn lessons and share best practice in Whitehall, says the Committee. Departments are also doing too little to learn from other member states.
On agriculture and rural development funding, for example, the Report states: "There is clearly scope to learn, with 21 countries having better records than the UK’s figure of £2.70 disallowance for every £100 received over the last 10 years.
"For example, the equivalent figures as at June 2015 for other countries include Lithuania at 90 pence, Ireland at 20 pence, and Estonia, Germany, Latvia and Austria at just 10 pence of penalties for every £100 received."
Treasury does not hold departments to account
The Committee concludes the Treasury "does not sufficiently hold departments to account for spending EU funds" and calls on it to publish a strategy for using EU funds in the UK, setting out standards for performance and value for money.
It finds the private sector and UK universities "have a good success rate in securing funding from EU-wide funding competitions" and urges the Treasury to lead new work to learn from this.
The Treasury should also "press the Commission to identify actions that will ensure that a budget focused on results becomes a reality", says the Committee, concluding "the current EU budget process limits the achievement of value for money".
Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the PAC, said:
"Government inaction on EU penalties is costing taxpayers dear. Money intended to support projects and programmes in the UK is instead being lost.
The apparent lack of practical concern about this fact until recently will anger many people, whatever their views on Britain's EU membership.
As a priority the Treasury and departments must identify the reasons they keep being penalised and take whatever action is necessary to rectify their mistakes.
Beyond that, on behalf of taxpayers our Committee will expect the announcement of a named official to take responsibility for improving performance in this area.
What makes this doubly frustrating is departments have hindered themselves by introducing still further complexity to already complex EU programmes. As we have seen, these poor decisions can have costly repercussions.
The experiences of EU member states, the UK private sector and UK universities point to some simple overall conclusions: thegovernment has much to learn and the sooner it learns it, the better."
UK third largest net budget contributor
In 2014, the EU budget received €143.9 billion (£116.0 billion) in contributions from 28 member states and other sources, and made €142.5 billion (£114.8 billion) in payments. The UK gross contribution to the EU budget, after taking into account the UK rebate of £4.9 billion, was £11.4 billion.
It received £5.6 billion in public and private-sector receipts from the EU budget, thus making the UK’s net contribution £5.7 billion. If private sector receipts are excluded, the net contribution in 2014–15 was equivalent to 1.4% of UK government total departmental expenditure.
Overall, the UK was the third-largest net contributor of all member states in 2014.
Over the last decade, the UK government has incurred at least £650 million in penalties to the European Commission because of errors in how UK public bodies have spent European Union (EU) funds.
EU rules and regulations for spending EU funds are complex, and this in itself contributes to errors; however, UK governments have chosen to design programmes which have added to this complexity, driving up the risk of errors and penalties further.
Departments have exhibited "lack of urgency"
UK government departments have exhibited a distinct lack of urgency in tackling complexity and reducing the levels of penalties incurred.
HM Treasury has not done enough to hold departments to account for spending EU funds, nor to encourage learning from best practice, nor to lead by example by improving the quality of information available on how well EU funds are spent in the UK.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Brexit: agriculture report published04/05/2017 12:20:00
The EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee publishes its report which investigates the implications of Brexit for UK agriculture and food, particularly the implications of leaving the EU's Common Agriculture Policy and the Single Market.
Lords Committee reports on skills needed to maintain UK theatre04/05/2017 09:25:00
The Communications Committee publishes its report Skills for theatre: Developing the pipeline of talent.
Breaking the cycle of nuclear indecision: Government must act03/05/2017 15:25:00
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report 'Nuclear research and technology: Breaking the cycle of indecision' states that we have reached a critical moment for the future of the United Kingdom as a serious nuclear nation, and sets out a series of recommendations for the new Government after the general election.
Pupils should have more time for well-being, say MPs03/05/2017 13:15:00
As part of a joint inquiry into children and young people's mental health, the Health and Education Committees found that financial pressures are restricting the provision of mental health services in schools and colleges. The next Government must review the effect of the budget reductions in the education sector, the report adds.
Civil service inquiry breaks new ground as Government approaches Brexit03/05/2017 12:20:00
An in-depth consideration of the relationship between Ministers and civil servants is vital as Whitehall faces the challenges of leaving the EU – says the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee in its report.