Government must reset its approach to scrutiny as virtual parliament ends, says annual IfG parliamentary report
The government must drop its dismissive approach to scrutiny as parliament returns to in-person sittings, says a new report by the Institute for Government.
Parliamentary Monitor 2021, published today, finds that the efforts of MPs and peers to hold ministers to account during the 2019–21 parliamentary session were impeded by ministers’ frequent use of emergency powers and side-lining of parliament.
While the need to legislate rapidly was understandable at the start of the Covid pandemic, the new government – emboldened by the largest majority in 20 years – sought to avoid scrutiny and rush through legislation on issues beyond the pandemic too, including giving MPs just a single day to debate its Brexit trade deal in December 2020.
Parliament itself adapted rapidly to the practical difficulties of the pandemic. It experimented with new ways of working, including virtual sittings and proxy voting, some of which it should consider making permanent. Implemented at impressive speed, these changes are calculated to have cost parliament a net £20m in day-to-day running costs.
Parliamentary Monitor 2021 sets out how:
- The Commons spent over a fifth of its time on the pandemic, though Covid restrictions meant that some forms of parliamentary business, including debates initiated by backbenchers, were limited at certain times.
- Key Covid legislation was often introduced without proper scrutiny: more than one in 10 Covid-related statutory instruments came into force before MPs even saw them.
- The government limited scrutiny of other business, restricting the time available for MPs and peers to examine its Brexit trade deal and attempting to deny MPs a vote on its cuts to overseas aid.
- The expansion of proxy voting in the Commons, rather than the continued use of remote voting, saw party whips exert greater control over their MPs: during the period of expanded proxy voting, 95% of all proxies were cast by whips.
- Ministers prioritised making major announcements in press conferences rather than in parliament – Boris Johnson spent more time in Downing Street press conferences than giving Commons statements. While understandable early on in the crisis, this continued throughout the session, unnecessarily limiting opportunities for Commons scrutiny.
- The government’s attitude to scrutiny frustrated increasingly restive backbench MPs, with almost one-third of all Conservative MPs rebelling at least once during the session.
- The government has got used to working differently in the pandemic, and in many ways, on its own terms. But as an extraordinary period in UK politics comes to a close, there is no longer any justification for ministers to continue to act in extraordinary ways. Just as the government has returned parliament to pre-pandemic norms, it must now reset its own working practices.
Alice Lilly, report co-author and senior researcher at the Institute for Government, said:
“Covid meant that Parliament—and the government—had to do things differently. Early on, this meant passing legislation quickly with limited scrutiny. But the government has constrained opportunities for parliamentary scrutiny throughout the session —including on non-Covid issues such the EU-UK trade deal and cuts to overseas aid spending. With the government facing difficult decisions in the coming months – including on social care and the public finances – now is the time to rebuild its relationship with parliament.”
Notes for editors:
Latest News from
Bank of England wrong to continue policy of quantitative easing, says IEA expert24/09/2021 10:15:00
Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), commented on the Bank of England’s decision to continue its policy of quantitative easing Julian
The pandemic has further opened up deep health inequalities: The King’s Fund responds to new life expectancy data for 2020 from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)24/09/2021 09:15:00
Dr Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, commented on the 2020 life expectancy data released by the ONS yesterday
The UK should introduce a British innovation principle, says new IEA research23/09/2021 13:15:00
The UK should introduce a British innovation principe, says new IEA research
JRF - What does a “very difficult winter” look like for low-income families?23/09/2021 12:15:00
New analysis on the planned £20-a-week cut to Universal Credit and the rising cost of living.
Tax bumper pandemic profits to kickstart a fairer and stronger post-crisis economy, says IPPR22/09/2021 14:20:00
In a major publication ahead of the party conferences of the two main parties, the IPPR think tank has set out a vision for the economic recovery that rebalances power and spreads prosperity across the country.
IFS - Response to the latest ONS public sector finances data22/09/2021 10:05:00
Isabel Stockton, Research Economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies responded to the latest ONS public sector finances data
IEA expert responds to ONS public sector finance figures22/09/2021 09:05:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to ONS public sector finance figures for August 2021
IFS - No jobseeker’s paradise: vacancies above pre-pandemic levels, but only in low-paid occupations, and competition for jobs is still higher than pre-pandemic for most21/09/2021 12:20:00
Despite overall job vacancies climbing above pre-pandemic levels