Government must resist saving “poorly run” businesses, urges IEA expert
Andy Mayer, Energy Analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the collapse of Britishvolt
“Britishvolt (BV) was a poorly run business that failed despite Government support and political assumptions about the future of transport.
“BV’s necessity was rooted in two assumptions. That the UK’s past success in making cars must be continued, and that heavy batteries must be made close to car plants to reduce their cost and impact.
“The UK’s current advantage lies in manufacturing engines, specifically the internal combustion engines that use fossil fuels, particularly in luxury vehicles. The Government has signalled it will ban this industry in two stages: 2030 for dedicated engines, and 2035 for hybrids.
“Whether location matters rests on the difference in cost and social costs attached to transport. It clearly doesn’t matter for example for the manufacture of most consumer goods, made in Asia.
“These countries also dominate the global market for making batteries, while the leading UK site is Chinese. The UK is expensive for land, labour, and energy, all three major costs for manufacturing. Current UK policies artificially raise the cost of land through planning, seek to make the UK a ‘high-wage’ economy, and force up the price of energy.
“In brief the UK seeks to ban the thing it leads the world in producing and is throwing money at poor quality projects. The UK has done little to nothing to reduce the cost of making things in the UK. Industrial strategy and subsidies will make that problem worse, by imposing their cost on other industries, and creating an investment climate where no one will act without the promise of support.
“The alternative is letting world-beating companies emerge by proof of their own efforts and trade. This requires low stable taxes, pro-growth regulation, and the courage to resist intervention.”
Latest News from
The King's Fund responds to the latest statistics from NHS Digital on the general practice26/01/2023 16:25:00
Beccy Baird, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund responds to the latest statistics from NHS Digital on the general practice workforce and general practice appointments
“Heart-breaking and wrong” that a million children under 4 growing up in poverty - JRF26/01/2023 15:25:00
Almost 3 in 10 children in families, where the youngest child is aged under five (28%) or primary school age between 5 and 10 years (29%), have experienced poverty and many will continue to experience hardship during the cost of living crisis.
IFS - The overall funding outlook26/01/2023 12:25:00
This chapter looks at the Scottish government's funding outlook in the short term (2022–23 and 2023–24), medium term (2024–25 to 2027–28) and beyond.
IPPR - State of the North: North of England experiencing lowest investment of advanced economies, but levelling up is possible26/01/2023 11:25:00
Major report shows that if the North were a country, it would be second only to Greece for the lowest levels of investment in the OECD
The King's Fund responds to the latest ONS mortality data25/01/2023 09:25:00
Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund commented on the Office of National Statistics (ONS) monthly mortality analysis December 2022
Public finances still on the wrong path, warns IEA economist24/01/2023 16:15:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on today’s ONS public sector finances figures
IFS response to new public finance figures24/01/2023 13:25:00
Isabel Stockton, Senior Research Economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies responded to the new public finance figures
IEA - Red tape could strangle Britain’s lab meat revolution, warns new report20/01/2023 10:05:00
Research from the Institute of Economic Affairs urges government to create a more favourable regulatory regime for food innovation
JRF - Falling housing affordability for renters the result of four decades of cuts to housing subsidies19/01/2023 12:20:00
The affordability of rental properties would not have fallen had successive governments not eroded housing subsidies over four decades, according to a new report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF).